Comparison of Produce Prescription Benefit Dosage

NCT ID: NCT05978843

Last Updated: 2026-01-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

242 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-03-01

Study Completion Date

2024-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this study is to determine the relationship between produce prescription program 'dose' on benefit redemption, food insecurity, and fruit and vegetable consumption. Participants will be randomized to receive one of three fruit and vegetable benefit dose amounts for 6 months ($40, $80, or $110/month).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Emerging evidence from the growing body of research around 'Food is Medicine' interventions shows promise that produce prescriptions (PPR) improve health by enabling purchases of healthy foods, reducing food insecurity, and improving diet quality. However, PPR amounts are often set seemingly arbitrarily, without clear connection to their intended purpose. In this study, investigators will conduct a three-armed randomized trial of 240 participants in Stockton, CA to test the impact of three 'doses' of a fruit and vegetable benefit on benefit redemption, food security, and fruit and vegetable intake. The goal of this study is to determine the relationship between PPR program 'dose' and the key intermediate outcomes of benefit redemption (primary outcome), food insecurity, and consumption of incentivized foods (secondary outcomes). Investigators will also seek to identify any 'ceiling effect' above which further increases in benefit value do not lead to further benefit redemption. This will be highly informative for subsequent PPR research. Investigators will leverage the existing infrastructure of the Vouchers 4 Veggies - EatSF produce prescription program to ensure feasibility.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Food Insecurity

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Participants will be randomized into one of three arms. Each arm will receive a different benefit amount during the 6-month intervention period, with benefit amounts determined by a percentage of the Thrifty Food Plan (TFP) - the USDA food plan used to calculate SNAP benefit rates. For ethical reasons, participants will each receive the same total benefit amount over the course of the study, with those randomized to the lower benefit arms receiving the difference between the value of the benefits issued to them and the value of the benefits issued to the highest dose group as a lump sum payment at the end of the study.
Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arm 1 - 10% TFP

Participants will receive $40/month in fruit and vegetable benefits for 6 months ($240 total).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Monetary benefit to purchase fruits and vegetables

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Participants will receive varying benefit amounts to purchase fruits and vegetables.

Arm 2 - 20% TFP

Participants will receive $80/month in fruit and vegetable benefits for 6 months ($480 total).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Monetary benefit to purchase fruits and vegetables

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Participants will receive varying benefit amounts to purchase fruits and vegetables.

Arm 3 - 30% TFP

Participants will receive $110/month in fruit and vegetable benefits for 6 months ($660).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Monetary benefit to purchase fruits and vegetables

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Participants will receive varying benefit amounts to purchase fruits and vegetables.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Monetary benefit to purchase fruits and vegetables

Participants will receive varying benefit amounts to purchase fruits and vegetables.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Individual enrolled in a First Five Program at El Concilio California, located in Stockton, CA
* Age 18+
* English or Spanish speaking
* Literacy sufficient to complete a written survey
* Technologic capacity to complete an online survey

Exclusion Criteria

* non English or Spanish speaking
* cognitive impairment severe enough to interfere with understanding of the survey or consent form, whether due to cognitive delay, substance abuse, dementia, mental illness, or other etiologies
* Not enrolled in a First Five Program at El Concilio California
* Actively receiving another V4V/EatSF card
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

American Heart Association

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of California, San Francisco

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Hilary Seligman, MD, MAS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of California, San Francisco

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of California, San Francisco

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Berkowitz SA, Baggett TP, Wexler DJ, Huskey KW, Wee CC. Food insecurity and metabolic control among U.S. adults with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2013 Oct;36(10):3093-9. doi: 10.2337/dc13-0570. Epub 2013 Jun 11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23757436 (View on PubMed)

Bhat S, Coyle DH, Trieu K, Neal B, Mozaffarian D, Marklund M, Wu JHY. Healthy Food Prescription Programs and their Impact on Dietary Behavior and Cardiometabolic Risk Factors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Adv Nutr. 2021 Oct 1;12(5):1944-1956. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmab039.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33999108 (View on PubMed)

Seligman HK, Laraia BA, Kushel MB. Food insecurity is associated with chronic disease among low-income NHANES participants. J Nutr. 2010 Feb;140(2):304-10. doi: 10.3945/jn.109.112573. Epub 2009 Dec 23.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20032485 (View on PubMed)

Ridberg RA, Bell JF, Merritt KE, Harris DM, Young HM, Tancredi DJ. Effect of a Fruit and Vegetable Prescription Program on Children's Fruit and Vegetable Consumption. Prev Chronic Dis. 2019 Jun 13;16:E73. doi: 10.5888/pcd16.180555.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31198165 (View on PubMed)

Ridberg RA, Levi R, Marpadga S, Akers M, Tancredi DJ, Seligman HK. Additional Fruit and Vegetable Vouchers for Pregnant WIC Clients: An Equity-Focused Strategy to Improve Food Security and Diet Quality. Nutrients. 2022 Jun 1;14(11):2328. doi: 10.3390/nu14112328.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35684128 (View on PubMed)

Stotz SA, Budd Nugent N, Ridberg R, Byker Shanks C, Her K, Yaroch AL, Seligman H. Produce prescription projects: Challenges, solutions, and emerging best practices - Perspectives from health care providers. Prev Med Rep. 2022 Aug 13;29:101951. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101951. eCollection 2022 Oct.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 36161127 (View on PubMed)

Xie J, Price A, Curran N, Ostbye T. The impact of a produce prescription programme on healthy food purchasing and diabetes-related health outcomes. Public Health Nutr. 2021 Aug;24(12):3945-3955. doi: 10.1017/S1368980021001828. Epub 2021 Apr 27.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33902771 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

A999999

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

RHWP Prescription Produce Plan
NCT04995237 COMPLETED NA
Grocery Assistance Program Study
NCT02643576 COMPLETED NA
Front-of-Package Nutrition Labels
NCT06516627 COMPLETED NA