The Investigation of Underlying Mechanism of Lumbar Multifidus Muscle Activation Deficits

NCT ID: NCT05961774

Last Updated: 2024-06-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-03-15

Study Completion Date

2024-06-14

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate mechanism underlying lumbar multifidus muscle (LM) activation deficits in adults with chronic low back pain (CLBP). The main questions it aim to answer is whether motor cortex or muscular level is the underlying mechanism responsible for the LM activation deficits.

Participants will:

* Undergo cortical excitability measurement using transcranial magnetic stimulation, LM activation measurement using ultrasound imaging, and force measurement using hand-held dynamometer.
* Be randomly assigned to either repetitive magnetic stimulation (rTMS) or neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES)
* Undergo all measurement at post-intervention Researchers will compare within and between groups to see changes in cortical excitability, LM activation, and force.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Procedure The study will use a sample of convenience. The subject with CLBP will be recruited by the flyers posted at physical therapy clinic, as well as words of mouths. The participants who are interested in the study will undergo screening process for eligibility using the inclusion-exclusion criteria checklist. If the participants meet the eligibility criteria, participants will receive the brief information of the study and the consent process will be performed.

After receiving the informed consents, all participants will be requested to fill out the information sheet for demographic and clinical data. The participants will be asked to change the cloth of the top to be able to expose the lower back region. After collecting demographic and clinical data, 3-condition of LM thickness and cross-sectional area will be measured including 1) resting condition (Rest), maximum voluntary isometric contraction condition (MVIC), and maximum voluntary isometric contraction combined with neuromuscular electrical stimulation (COMB). The landmarks will be identified while the participants lay down in prone position. The landmarks include 1) lumbar spinous process of L2-L5 and 2) L4-5 facet joint (2 cm lateral to lower half of spinous process of L4). Rehabilitative ultrasound imaging (RUSI) will be used to measure LM activation and hand-held dynamometer will be used to measure force in this study across 3 conditions.

The participant will have 10 minutes rest before the transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). A pair of surface electrodes (Ag/AgCl, 10 mm) will be place according to SENIAM recommendation. The common ground electrode will be placed at the iliac crest. Two surface EMG electrodes will be placed relative to L4-5 along with the line joining from posterosuperior iliac spine and L1-L2 vertebral interspace (24) on the side of pain. The researcher will determine the hotspot of lumbar multifidus muscle area on the brain. The hotspot of the LM will be determined by least intensity of TMS which at least elicits 50 percent of measurable motor evoked potential (MEP) and this intensity will be the active motor threshold (AMT) of the participants. After the AMT is achieved, the 120% of AMT will be used as the intensity to induce the MEP. The MEP will be used to represent cortical excitability.

After the baseline RUSI and TMS data collection, the participants will be randomly assigned in to 2 groups include 1) NMES and high-frequency repetitive TMS (HF-rTMS) group. For HF-rTMS group, the participants will be in sitting position feet placed firmly on the floor. The stimulation point is the LM hot spot which is pre-determined by single pulse TMS as aforementioned. The HF-rTMS will be applied for participant individually. According to the theory, HF-rTMS results in facilitation of the targeted area; therefore, it will increase the excitability of the LM hot spot and potentially increase LM's neural drive and activation. The parameters will be set at frequency 10 Hz, 50 number of pulses, 40 train of stimulation (5 seconds stimulation and 25 seconds inter-stimulation interval) (34). The stimulation will approximately 20 minutes. The position of coil will be placed tangentially at 45 degrees on the LM hotspot. For the neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) group, participants will be lying in prone position. The landmarks and electrodes placements are the same as mentioned in MVIC combined with NMES and LM thickness measurement. NMES parameters are interferential current 6000 Hz, amplitude 20-50 Hz with scanning mode, duration 20-minute, intensity to elicit the LM contraction (6). After the participants completed receiving the stimulation, the participant will undergo the collecting the LM thickness and force again using the same protocol.

Data will be used to 1) identify changes in cortical excitability, LM activation and force before and after stimulation at cortical level by HF-rTMS, 2) identify changes in cortical excitability, LM activation and force before and after stimulation at muscular level by NMES, and 3) compare the percent changes in cortical excitability, LM activation and force between stimulation at cortical (by HF-rTMS) and muscular (by NMES) levels.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Low Back Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

High frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

This group will receive high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Transcranial magnetic stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

The stimulation point is the lumbar multifidus hotspot. The parameters will be set at frequency 10 Hz, 50 number of pulses, 40 train of stimulation (5 seconds stimulation and 25 seconds inter-stimulation interval). The position of coil will be placed tangentially at 45 degrees on the LM hotspot. The stimulation will be 20 minutes.

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation

This group will receive neuromuscular electrical stimulation.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

The neuromuscular electrical stimulation will be set as interferential current 6000 Hz, amplitude 20-50 Hz with scanning mode, duration 20 minutes, intensity to elicit the LM contraction.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Transcranial magnetic stimulation

The stimulation point is the lumbar multifidus hotspot. The parameters will be set at frequency 10 Hz, 50 number of pulses, 40 train of stimulation (5 seconds stimulation and 25 seconds inter-stimulation interval). The position of coil will be placed tangentially at 45 degrees on the LM hotspot. The stimulation will be 20 minutes.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation

The neuromuscular electrical stimulation will be set as interferential current 6000 Hz, amplitude 20-50 Hz with scanning mode, duration 20 minutes, intensity to elicit the LM contraction.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male and female age between 18 and 40 years.
* Experience of low back pain at least 3 months, or recurrent of back pain for at least two episodes in 6 months that interferes with activities of daily living.

Exclusion Criteria

* Spondylolysis, spondylolisthesis, spine tumor and malignancy
* Radiculopathy or myelopathy
* History of lumbar or abdominal surgery
* Pregnancy
* Neurological Disease (e.g., stroke, Parkinson, traumatic brain injury, spinal cord injury)
* Major cardiovascular diseases (e.g., heart failure, coronary artery diseases, angina pain)
* Skin lesion (e.g., skin laceration) on site of stimulation.
* Experience of lumbar motor control exercise more than or equal to 2 weeks
* Metal implantation sensitive to magnetic field, or cardiac implantations
* BMI greater or equal to 30 kg/m2
* Taking any medications that would interfere with brain stimulation (e.g., Calcium channel blockers, Na+ channel blocker, NMDA antagonist, Glutamate receptor antagonist, nicotine uptake)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Research Council of Thailand

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Mahidol University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Peemongkon Wattananon

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Peemongkon Wattananon, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Mahidol University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Faculty of Physical Therapy, Mahidol University

Salaya, Changwat Nakhon Pathom, Thailand

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Thailand

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Songjaroen S, Sungnak P, Piriyaprasarth P, Wang HK, Laskin JJ, Wattananon P. Combined neuromuscular electrical stimulation with motor control exercise can improve lumbar multifidus activation in individuals with recurrent low back pain. Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 20;11(1):14815. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-94402-2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34285318 (View on PubMed)

Wattananon P, Sungnak P, Songjaroen S, Kantha P, Hsu WL, Wang HK. Using neuromuscular electrical stimulation in conjunction with ultrasound imaging technique to investigate lumbar multifidus muscle activation deficit. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2020 Dec;50:102215. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2020.102215. Epub 2020 Jul 13.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33220931 (View on PubMed)

Hodges PW, Danneels L. Changes in Structure and Function of the Back Muscles in Low Back Pain: Different Time Points, Observations, and Mechanisms. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2019 Jun;49(6):464-476. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2019.8827.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31151377 (View on PubMed)

Wallwork TL, Stanton WR, Freke M, Hides JA. The effect of chronic low back pain on size and contraction of the lumbar multifidus muscle. Man Ther. 2009 Oct;14(5):496-500. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2008.09.006. Epub 2008 Nov 21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19027343 (View on PubMed)

Tsao H, Danneels LA, Hodges PW. ISSLS prize winner: Smudging the motor brain in young adults with recurrent low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Oct 1;36(21):1721-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31821c4267.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21508892 (View on PubMed)

Wand BM, Parkitny L, O'Connell NE, Luomajoki H, McAuley JH, Thacker M, Moseley GL. Cortical changes in chronic low back pain: current state of the art and implications for clinical practice. Man Ther. 2011 Feb;16(1):15-20. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2010.06.008. Epub 2010 Jul 23.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20655796 (View on PubMed)

Masse-Alarie H, Beaulieu LD, Preuss R, Schneider C. Corticomotor control of lumbar multifidus muscles is impaired in chronic low back pain: concurrent evidence from ultrasound imaging and double-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation. Exp Brain Res. 2016 Apr;234(4):1033-45. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4528-x. Epub 2015 Dec 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26708518 (View on PubMed)

van Dieen JH, Reeves NP, Kawchuk G, van Dillen LR, Hodges PW. Motor Control Changes in Low Back Pain: Divergence in Presentations and Mechanisms. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2019 Jun;49(6):370-379. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2019.7917. Epub 2018 Jun 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29895230 (View on PubMed)

Strutton PH, Theodorou S, Catley M, McGregor AH, Davey NJ. Corticospinal excitability in patients with chronic low back pain. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005 Oct;18(5):420-4. doi: 10.1097/01.bsd.0000169063.84628.fe.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16189454 (View on PubMed)

Masse-Alarie H, Beaulieu LD, Preuss R, Schneider C. The side of chronic low back pain matters: evidence from the primary motor cortex excitability and the postural adjustments of multifidi muscles. Exp Brain Res. 2017 Mar;235(3):647-659. doi: 10.1007/s00221-016-4834-y. Epub 2016 Nov 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27847987 (View on PubMed)

Patricio P, Roy JS, Macedo L, Roy M, Leonard G, Hodges P, Masse-Alarie H. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation alone and in combination with motor control exercise for the treatment of individuals with chronic non-specific low back pain (ExTraStim trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 24;11(3):e045504. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045504.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33762244 (View on PubMed)

O'Connell NE, Wand BM, Marston L, Spencer S, Desouza LH. Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques for chronic pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Apr 11;(4):CD008208. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008208.pub3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24729198 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MU-CIRB 2023/027.1503

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Non-Invasive Stimulation for Improving Motor Function
NCT03592173 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE2