Effect of Robotic Treatments on Motor Functions in Subacute Stroke Patients

NCT ID: NCT05947773

Last Updated: 2023-08-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

45 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-07-09

Study Completion Date

2023-09-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

We are conducting a three-group comparative study on stroke patients. The treatment is started in a subacute state and completed in the hospital. The essence of robot-assisted treatments is faster recovery and better learning to walk. The group will do a special walking exercise with a robot. The walking group does the same training, only without robotic assistance. The control group will receive physiotherapy treatments financed by the state. Control examination after 3 weeks.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stroke

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Robotically treated patient

They performed training with a robot 15 times over 3 weeks.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Learning to walk with a robot

Intervention Type OTHER

The patients completed a 1-hour learning to walk program using a soft exoskeleton. The protocol includes several difficult parts of the walk. (Walking protocol)

Walking training

Walking exercises were performed without a robot.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Walking group

Intervention Type OTHER

The walking protocol was performed without robotic assistance for 1 hour every day for 3 weeks.

Control group

Physiotherapy treatment was carried out by the patients.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Control group

Intervention Type OTHER

The control group performed the physiotherapy treatment for 3 weeks.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Learning to walk with a robot

The patients completed a 1-hour learning to walk program using a soft exoskeleton. The protocol includes several difficult parts of the walk. (Walking protocol)

Intervention Type OTHER

Walking group

The walking protocol was performed without robotic assistance for 1 hour every day for 3 weeks.

Intervention Type OTHER

Control group

The control group performed the physiotherapy treatment for 3 weeks.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

ROB WALK CON

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

post stroke 6MWT : 120\> minimum after stroke 3 days be a stroke patient first stroke hemiplegia

Exclusion Criteria

multiple strokes, inability to stand and walk, cognitive function disorder does not reach 50 meters with a minimal walking aid Alcohol Sever heart problem sever demeanor alcoholism drug problems Drug
Minimum Eligible Age

55 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Somogy Megyei Kaposi Mór Teaching Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Tollár József

Head of Department

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Dr. Tollár József

Kaposvár, Somogy County, Hungary

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Hungary

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IKEB/2022/02

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.