Ethibond Suture vs Vessel Loop as Draining Seton for Complex Anal Fistulas

NCT ID: NCT05933343

Last Updated: 2025-10-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

2 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-12-10

Study Completion Date

2025-10-16

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Drainage seton is usually placed for long-term control of symptoms, and hence it has to be effective in drainage of infection, durable, and comfortable to the patients. The present study assumes that different seton materials would attain different drainage capacities, variable durability and impact on QoL. Therefore, the study aims to compare two commonly used seton materials; Ethibond suture and vessel loop, in the management of CAF in terms of effectiveness in draining infection, percent of seton break and its timing, and change in patients' QoL as measured by a validated questionnaire.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The use of seton as a surgical therapy for fistulous disease has been first described by Hippocrates in 430 BCE. Since then several authors have used either cutting or drainage seton to treat CAF. Different materials have been used as seton, including sutures, stainless steel wires, catheters, cables, silicone, and rubber bands. While the main aim of a drainage seton is to simply drain sepsis and control symptoms in the long term, cutting setons are mainly used for eradiation of the fistula pathology by cutting through the fistula tract and anal sphincter muscles, yet at the cost of an increased risk of fecal incontinence (FI).

As the purpose of a drainage seton is to provide long-term, durable drainage of perineal sepsis and control of symptoms, namely discharge, the seton material can have an impact on its function and durability. A review of the variations in seton types and materials showed that the success rates of suture seton (silk, prolene or nylon suture) are higher than those of Penrose drains and catheters. However, there is a paucity of data on the impact of the seton material on the durability of seton and quality of life (QoL)

Drainage seton is usually placed for long-term control of symptoms, and hence it has to be effective in drainage of infection, durable, and comfortable to the patients. The present study assumes that different seton materials would attain different drainage capacities, variable durability, and impact on QoL. Therefore, the study aims to compare two commonly used seton materials; Ethibond suture and vessel loop, in the management of CAF in terms of effectiveness in draining infection, percent of seton break and its timing, and change in patients' QoL as measured by a validated questionnaire.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Anal Fistula

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Ethibond suture

Patients with complex anal fistula will undergo placement of Ethibond™ 1 suture as a drainage seton

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Ethibond suture

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

An Ethibond™ 1 suture will be placed as a drainage seton for complex anal fistula

Vessel loop

Patients with complex anal fistula will undergo placement of vessel loop as a drainage seton

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Vessel loop

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

A vessel loop will be placed as a drainage seton for complex anal fistula

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ethibond suture

An Ethibond™ 1 suture will be placed as a drainage seton for complex anal fistula

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Vessel loop

A vessel loop will be placed as a drainage seton for complex anal fistula

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult patients aged 18 years or older of either sex who present with CAF will be included. Both cryptoglandular fistulas and fistulas secondary to inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)

Exclusion Criteria

* Simple anal fistulas
* Fistulas secondary to malignancy or irradiation therapy
* Pregnant women
* Patients with pre-existing setons
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

The Cleveland Clinic

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Rizkalla, Sameh M.D.

Project Scientist

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Steven D Wexner, M.D.

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Cleveland Clinic Florida

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Cleveland Clinic Florida

Weston, Florida, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CCF06282023

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

LIFT-plug vs LIFT, a RCT Trial
NCT04310800 UNKNOWN NA