Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-08-10
2018-07-04
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Objective: The aim of this study is to determine the feasibility of SuperSeton placement in patients with perianal fistulas.
Study design: The design of the study is a feasibility study.
Study population: Patients (≥ 18 years) with perianal fistulas (ever) treated with a knotted seton are eligible.
Intervention: The SuperSeton will be placed at the outpatient clinic in patients that already have a seton in situ. This seton will then be exchanged by the SuperSeton. In case patients do not have a seton in situ, the SuperSeton can be placed at the operating theatre in day care setting instead of a regular seton.
Main study parameters/endpoints: The primary outcome is seton failure (loosening of the seton). Secondary outcomes are time of procedure, complications and quality of life measured by the PDAI ('Perianal Disease Activity Index').
Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation: The SuperSeton will be placed in patients with perianal fistulas (ever) treated with a conventional knotted seton. There are no additional risks involved. The seton will be placed at the outpatient clinic in patients with a seton in situ, or at the operating theatre in day care setting in patients with a perianal abscess without a seton. The material that is used for the Setons is of medical grade polyurethane, this is the same material of catheters that are already used in clinical practice (instech BTPU 027). The Setons including the insert (BTPU) are supplied sterile (Synergy Health). Sample size calculation: A group of 60 patients will be included to determine feasibility of the SuperSeton. The proposed treatment protocol is considered feasible if at least 70% of the SuperSetons stay in place.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
SuperSeton arm
SuperSeton
The SuperSeton will be placed at the outpatient clinic in patients that already have a seton in situ. This seton will then be exchanged by the SuperSeton. In case patients do not have a seton in situ, the SuperSeton can be placed at the operating theatre in day care setting instead of a regular seton.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
SuperSeton
The SuperSeton will be placed at the outpatient clinic in patients that already have a seton in situ. This seton will then be exchanged by the SuperSeton. In case patients do not have a seton in situ, the SuperSeton can be placed at the operating theatre in day care setting instead of a regular seton.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Written informed consent
* Perianal fistula with a seton in situ or a recurrent perianal fistula for which a new seton will be placed
Exclusion Criteria
* Rectovaginal fistula
* Patients with a stoma
* Life expectancy \< 2 years
* The inability of reading/understanding and filling in the questionnaires
* Dementia or altered mental status that would prohibit the understanding and giving of informed consent
* Participation in another trial
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Proctos Kliniek
OTHER
MediShield B.V.
UNKNOWN
Delft University of Technology
OTHER
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Prof. dr. W.A. Bemelman
PhD
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2016_018
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id