Alternating and Direct Current Stimulation for Neuropathic Eye Pain

NCT ID: NCT05931250

Last Updated: 2023-07-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-06-16

Study Completion Date

2025-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this clinical intervention is to test if two forms of transcranial current stimulation, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) or transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) can alleviate neuropathic eye pain in a sample of 20 patients.

The main aims are:

* Test if tDCS/tACS can alleviate neuropathic eye pain and/or other cerebral symptoms: brain fatigue, migraine, light sensitivity, etc.
* Test if one stimulation method is superior to the other Patients will be treated for a total of fifteen 30-minute stimulation sessions, three times a day over a five-day period, each stimulation separated by approximately 4 hours, with either active tACS or tDCS over the scalp corresponding to primary sensory and motor areas.

The patients will have questionnaires to monitor subjective experiences and pupillometry before and after treatment to monitor experimental outcomes.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Brief Summary sufficient

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Eye Pain Neuropathy, Optic Cerebral Injury

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Transcranial alternating current stimulation

Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) device using 50x70 mm electrodes that are placed bilaterally between EEG coordinates C3/C5 for left hemisphere and C4/C6 for right hemisphere (corresponding to S1 and M1 of the eye). The alternating current electrodes are in-phase and have the same peak to peak stimulation 3mA, for 30 minutes duration at 10Hz. An impedance value under 15 ohms is required at all times to ensure patient comfort and safety.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

DC-Stimulator Plus (NeuroConn GmbH, Germany)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Transcranial alternating current stimulation

Transcranial direct current stimulation

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) device using 50x70 mm electrodes that has the anodal electrode placed contralateral to most prominent ocular pain or, in the case of bilateral pain symptoms, contralateral to the dominant hand between EEG coordinates C3/C5 for left hemisphere and C4/C6 for right hemisphere (corresponding to S1 and M1 of the eye), and the cathode placed on the patient's upper arm. A current peaking at 3mA will ramp up for 20 secs and be delivered for a total of 20 minutes, thereafter, ramping down for 20s. An impedance value under 15 ohms is required at all times to ensure patient comfort and safety.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Sooma direct current stimulator (Sooma, Finland)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Transcranial direct current stimulation

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

DC-Stimulator Plus (NeuroConn GmbH, Germany)

Transcranial alternating current stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Sooma direct current stimulator (Sooma, Finland)

Transcranial direct current stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* persistent eye pain for at least 6 months
* average eye pain intensity of 4 or more on a 0-10 numerical rating scale
* naive to transcranial stimulation
* eye pain having neuropathic-like characteristics

Exclusion Criteria

* contraindication to transcranial stimulation (i.e., pacemaker, cardioverter defibrillator, neuro-stimulation (brain or spinal cord), bone growth stimulations, indwelling blood pressure monitors, epilepsy, pregnancy)
* presence of ocular diseases that are the likely cause of pain (i.e., corneal and conjunctival scarring, corneal edema, uveitis, iris transillumination defects, etc.)
* current participation in another study with an investigational drug or device within one month prior to screening
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Linkoeping University

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Neil Lagali

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Neil Lagali

Principal Investigator, Professor

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Neil Lagali, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

RegionÖstergötland

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Eye Clinic, University Hospital in Linköping

Linköping, Other / Non-US, Sweden

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Sweden

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Neil Lagali, PhD

Role: CONTACT

+4613286680

Magnus Thordstein, MD

Role: CONTACT

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Neil Lagali

Role: primary

+4613286680

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Qazi Y, Hurwitz S, Khan S, Jurkunas UV, Dana R, Hamrah P. Validity and Reliability of a Novel Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS) in Quantifying and Monitoring Corneal and Ocular Surface Pain. Ophthalmology. 2016 Jul;123(7):1458-68. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.03.006. Epub 2016 Apr 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27089999 (View on PubMed)

Farhangi M, Feuer W, Galor A, Bouhassira D, Levitt RC, Sarantopoulos CD, Felix ER. Modification of the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory for use in eye pain (NPSI-Eye). Pain. 2019 Jul;160(7):1541-1550. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001552.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30883524 (View on PubMed)

Sivanesan E, Levitt RC, Sarantopoulos CD, Patin D, Galor A. Noninvasive Electrical Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Ocular Pain and Photophobia. Neuromodulation. 2018 Dec;21(8):727-734. doi: 10.1111/ner.12742. Epub 2017 Dec 28.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29283468 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

20220727401

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.