Smartphone-based Health Behaviour Intervention for Adolescents
NCT ID: NCT05912439
Last Updated: 2023-06-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
670 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-08-15
2023-12-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Motivations, Attitudes, and Perceptions Study
NCT05873413
Brief Motivational Interviewing +/- Mindfulness Training for Adolescent Alcohol Use in Pediatric Primary Care
NCT07059078
Efficacy of a Web-Based Alcohol Intervention for High School Students
NCT03613818
Self-Selected Brief Alcohol Intervention for Adolescents
NCT00383838
Personalized Booster Feedback After Alcohol Health Education
NCT03440476
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Extreme smartphone usage in adolescent and youth populations has been extensively covered but a more positive side to mobile usage is that a significant proportion of adolescents seek health information and clinical help online through their mobile devices, providing ample opportunities to reach at risk adolescents with science based methods focusing on health improvement. Health problems, i.e. mental health and lifestyle disease, disproportionally burden lower SES groups as well as diverse minority groups and smartphones could become a vital tool in eliminating such disparities since smartphone access and ownership is not related to SES status, gender or race in diverse economies. The mHealth market is steadily becoming saturated with applications and yearly increase in number of applications available has skyrocketed in recent years, with estimated 350.000 mHealth applications currently on the market. However, only 8% of adolescents seem to use health applications to improve their health, highlighting the apparent gap between easy access, extensive daily usage and lack of interest in mHealth applications among adolescents.
Lack of physical activity has been labelled a global pandemic and reported as the 4th leading global cause of death. Physical inactivity increases risk of lifestyle diseases, such as heart disease, type 2 diabetes and cancer, resulting in over 5 million annual global deaths. Further, the estimated annual financial burden of physical inactivity is nearly 54 billion USD in health care costs around the world. There seems to be a drop in physical activity in adolescence and a large part of adolescents are under the recommended physical activity levels provided by the World Health Organization (WHO). Lack of sufficient physical activity tends to continue into adulthood and research suggests that the majority of adolescents in the EU do not even reach 30% of recommended daily physical activity. Further, adolescents seem to have the unhealtiest diet of all age groups and adolescence is a particular susceptibility period to weight gain. Research has repeatedly revealed a significant relationship between nutritional behavior and physical activity in terms of weight management. A tremendous increase in global adolescent obesity has been witnessed in the past decades and prevalence for instance tripled since 1975. Cost-effective interventions to increase physical activity and improve nutritional behavior in adolescent populations are therefore direly needed.
Physical inactivity and inadequate nutritional habits are often interrelated to disabling emotional problems and integrated strategies should include all three pillars to improve physical as well as mental well-being in adolescent populations. Mobile health interventions targeting disabling emotional problems in adolescent populations have revealed encouraging outcome, despite the fact that attrition rates in these interventions are generally high. Varying definitions of attrition have complicated research on this topic but attrition is defined as leaving treatment before obtaining a required level of improvement or completing intervention goals. Research on mental mHealth interventions among adolescents have frequently lacked detailed time related attrition data alongside accurate definitions and analysis of attrition reasons though recent studies show promise in that regard. Attrition is regularly reported at two distinct points of time; intervention start and at end of intervention. A continuous measure of usage vs. non-usage in mHealth interventions for adolescents while simultaneously obtaining detailed usage data in order to prevent or delay exact times of attrition in future interventions would perhaps be an improved representation of attrition.
Increased knowledge on actual attrition factors and patterns in adolescent populations from mHealth interventions are direly needed. Obtaining a better understanding of how motivational support motivates adolescents to use mHealth applications and why they maintain or lose interest in using them to improve their health is of vital importance. Motivational support in mHealth interventions, defined as strategies to enhance motivation and counter attrition to overcome behavior change barriers, often include goal-setting, feedback, social support and rewards. Systematic reviews examining possible drivers behind usage point to group and task customization, localization, functional user support, gamification of health tasks and immediate visual but simplified feedback on user action while while gender-related motivational support features could be contributing factors. Timing of tailored motivational support, through just-in-time adaptive interventions (JITAIs), should be considered as well when implementing adolescent mHealth interventions since time-based individualization could counter high attritions rates. Given the magnitude of reported health problems among adolescents and lack of cost-effective health behaviour interventions specifically developed for adolescent populations, the need for better understanding of attrition reasons in adolescent mHealth interventions is massive. The purpose of this study is firstly to seek richer understanding of continuous attrition rates from a mHealth intervention called SidekickHealth in an adolescent population and what effects motivational support has on attrition rates. Secondly, the aim is to examine effectiveness of the intervention with the aim to increase daily mental, nutritional and physical health behaviour.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
BASIC_SCIENCE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Control
Measures for participants in control group are obtained at baseline and 42 days later. The control group receives no further contact, access to the mHealth application or information until study-end questionnaire measures are provided.
No interventions assigned to this group
Treatment-As-Usual
For participants in Treatment-As-Usual (TAU) group measures are obtained at baseline and 42 days later. Participants receive an approximately 10 minutes long introduction regarding study specifications and the mHealth application. Active participation in TAU group is defined as downloading the Sidekick app and completing at least 3 health exercises within it. Time of exercise is defined as the timestamp on completion of exercise within any of the three types of exercise categories (physical activity, nutrition and mental health) of the app. Exercise frequency refers to how often a given exercise was completed by a participant in TAU group. Time of attrition is defined as the time stamp of last completing health exercise within the Sidekick throughout intervention period. Participants in TAU group use the application individually throughout trial period without any motivational support.
SidekickHealth
Usage of mobile application called SidekickHealth.
Intervention
For participants in intervention group measures are obtained at baseline and 42 days later. Participants receive an approximately 10 minutes long introduction regarding study specifications and the mHealth application. Active participation in intervention group is defined as downloading the Sidekick app and completing at least 3 health exercises within it. Time of exercise is defined as the timestamp on completion of exercise within any of the three types of exercise categories (physical activity, nutrition and mental health) of the app. Exercise frequency refers to how often a given exercise was completed by a participant in TAU group. Time of attrition is defined as the time stamp of last completing health exercise within the Sidekick throughout intervention period. Participants in intervention group receive weekly motivational support in form of individual and group feedback on usage, participation in friendly health task competitions and weekly altruistic rewards for usage.
SidekickHealth
Usage of mobile application called SidekickHealth.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
SidekickHealth
Usage of mobile application called SidekickHealth.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
13 Years
16 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Iceland
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Iceland
Reykjavik, Reykjavik, Iceland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Jones EAK, Mitra AK, Bhuiyan AR. Impact of COVID-19 on Mental Health in Adolescents: A Systematic Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 3;18(5):2470. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052470.
Kormendi A. [Smartphone usage among adolescents]. Psychiatr Hung. 2015;30(3):297-302. Hungarian.
Birnbaum ML, Rizvi AF, Confino J, Correll CU, Kane JM. Role of social media and the Internet in pathways to care for adolescents and young adults with psychotic disorders and non-psychotic mood disorders. Early Interv Psychiatry. 2017 Aug;11(4):290-295. doi: 10.1111/eip.12237. Epub 2015 Mar 23.
Lawlor, A. & Kirakowski, J. (2014). Online support groups for mental health: A space for challenging self-stigma or a means of social avoidance? Computers in Human Behavior, 32, 152-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.11.015
Pretorius C, Chambers D, Coyle D. Young People's Online Help-Seeking and Mental Health Difficulties: Systematic Narrative Review. J Med Internet Res. 2019 Nov 19;21(11):e13873. doi: 10.2196/13873.
McLaughlin KA, Costello EJ, Leblanc W, Sampson NA, Kessler RC. Socioeconomic status and adolescent mental disorders. Am J Public Health. 2012 Sep;102(9):1742-50. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300477. Epub 2012 Feb 16.
Radomski AD, Wozney L, McGrath P, Huguet A, Hartling L, Dyson MP, Bennett K, Newton AS. Design and Delivery Features That May Improve the Use of Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Children and Adolescents With Anxiety: A Realist Literature Synthesis With a Persuasive Systems Design Perspective. J Med Internet Res. 2019 Feb 5;21(2):e11128. doi: 10.2196/11128.
IQVIA Institute. (2021, July 1). Digital Health Trends 2021. IQVIA. https://www.iqvia.com/-/media/iqvia/pdfs/institute-reports/digital-health-trends-2021/iqvia-institute-digital-health-trends-2021.pdf
Chan, A., Kow, R. & Cheng, J. K. (2017). Adolescents' perceptions on smartphone applications (apps) for health management. Journal of Mobile Technology in Medicine, 6(2), 47-55. https://doi.org/10.7309/jmtm.6.2.6
Kohl HW 3rd, Craig CL, Lambert EV, Inoue S, Alkandari JR, Leetongin G, Kahlmeier S; Lancet Physical Activity Series Working Group. The pandemic of physical inactivity: global action for public health. Lancet. 2012 Jul 21;380(9838):294-305. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60898-8.
Lee IM, Shiroma EJ, Lobelo F, Puska P, Blair SN, Katzmarzyk PT; Lancet Physical Activity Series Working Group. Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. Lancet. 2012 Jul 21;380(9838):219-29. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61031-9.
Ding D, Lawson KD, Kolbe-Alexander TL, Finkelstein EA, Katzmarzyk PT, van Mechelen W, Pratt M; Lancet Physical Activity Series 2 Executive Committee. The economic burden of physical inactivity: a global analysis of major non-communicable diseases. Lancet. 2016 Sep 24;388(10051):1311-24. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30383-X. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
Sember V, Jurak G, Kovac M, Duric S, Starc G. Decline of physical activity in early adolescence: A 3-year cohort study. PLoS One. 2020 Mar 11;15(3):e0229305. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229305. eCollection 2020.
Global Recommendations on Physical Activity for Health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK305057/
OECD (2016). Health at a Glance: Europe 2016 - State of Health in the EU Cycle. Paris, France: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264265592-en
Telama R, Yang X, Viikari J, Valimaki I, Wanne O, Raitakari O. Physical activity from childhood to adulthood: a 21-year tracking study. Am J Prev Med. 2005 Apr;28(3):267-73. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.12.003.
Craigie AM, Lake AA, Kelly SA, Adamson AJ, Mathers JC. Tracking of obesity-related behaviours from childhood to adulthood: A systematic review. Maturitas. 2011 Nov;70(3):266-84. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2011.08.005. Epub 2011 Sep 15.
Rose T, Barker M, Maria Jacob C, Morrison L, Lawrence W, Strommer S, Vogel C, Woods-Townsend K, Farrell D, Inskip H, Baird J. A Systematic Review of Digital Interventions for Improving the Diet and Physical Activity Behaviors of Adolescents. J Adolesc Health. 2017 Dec;61(6):669-677. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.05.024. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
Kouvari M, Karipidou M, Tsiampalis T, Mamalaki E, Poulimeneas D, Bathrellou E, Panagiotakos D, Yannakoulia M. Digital Health Interventions for Weight Management in Children and Adolescents: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2022 Feb 14;24(2):e30675. doi: 10.2196/30675.
WHO (2021, June 9th). Obesity and Overweight. World Health Organization. Retrieved January 26, 2023, from https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight#cms
Eysenbach G. The law of attrition. J Med Internet Res. 2005 Mar 31;7(1):e11. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7.1.e11.
Meyerowitz-Katz G, Ravi S, Arnolda L, Feng X, Maberly G, Astell-Burt T. Rates of Attrition and Dropout in App-Based Interventions for Chronic Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2020 Sep 29;22(9):e20283. doi: 10.2196/20283.
Topooco N, Bylehn S, Dahlstrom Nysater E, Holmlund J, Lindegaard J, Johansson S, Aberg L, Bergman Nordgren L, Zetterqvist M, Andersson G. Evaluating the Efficacy of Internet-Delivered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Blended With Synchronous Chat Sessions to Treat Adolescent Depression: Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res. 2019 Nov 1;21(11):e13393. doi: 10.2196/13393.
Adelman CB, Panza KE, Bartley CA, Bontempo A, Bloch MH. A meta-analysis of computerized cognitive-behavioral therapy for the treatment of DSM-5 anxiety disorders. J Clin Psychiatry. 2014 Jul;75(7):e695-704. doi: 10.4088/JCP.13r08894.
Mohr DC, Burns MN, Schueller SM, Clarke G, Klinkman M. Behavioral intervention technologies: evidence review and recommendations for future research in mental health. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2013 Jul-Aug;35(4):332-8. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2013.03.008. Epub 2013 May 8.
Maenhout L, Peuters C, Cardon G, Crombez G, DeSmet A, Compernolle S. Nonusage Attrition of Adolescents in an mHealth Promotion Intervention and the Role of Socioeconomic Status: Secondary Analysis of a 2-Arm Cluster-Controlled Trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 May 10;10(5):e36404. doi: 10.2196/36404.
Twomey C, O'Reilly G, Byrne M, Bury M, White A, Kissane S, McMahon A, Clancy N. A randomized controlled trial of the computerized CBT programme, MoodGYM, for public mental health service users waiting for interventions. Br J Clin Psychol. 2014 Nov;53(4):433-50. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12055. Epub 2014 May 15.
Melville KM, Casey LM, Kavanagh DJ. Dropout from Internet-based treatment for psychological disorders. Br J Clin Psychol. 2010 Nov;49(Pt 4):455-71. doi: 10.1348/014466509X472138. Epub 2009 Oct 1.
Mitchell, A. J. & Selmes, T. (2007). Why don't patients attend their appointments? Maintaining engagement with psychiatric services. Advances in psychiatric treatment, 13(6).423-434. https://doi.org/10.1192/apt.bp.106.003202
Vigerland S, Lenhard F, Bonnert M, Lalouni M, Hedman E, Ahlen J, Olen O, Serlachius E, Ljotsson B. Internet-delivered cognitive behavior therapy for children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev. 2016 Dec;50:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2016.09.005. Epub 2016 Sep 20.
Jeminiwa RN, Hohmann NS, Fox BI. Developing a Theoretical Framework for Evaluating the Quality of mHealth Apps for Adolescent Users: A Systematic Review. J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2019 Jul-Aug;24(4):254-269. doi: 10.5863/1551-6776-24.4.254.
Palos-Sanchez PR, Saura JR, Rios Martin MA, Aguayo-Camacho M. Toward a Better Understanding of the Intention to Use mHealth Apps: Exploratory Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Sep 9;9(9):e27021. doi: 10.2196/27021.
Nahum-Shani I, Smith SN, Spring BJ, Collins LM, Witkiewitz K, Tewari A, Murphy SA. Just-in-Time Adaptive Interventions (JITAIs) in Mobile Health: Key Components and Design Principles for Ongoing Health Behavior Support. Ann Behav Med. 2018 May 18;52(6):446-462. doi: 10.1007/s12160-016-9830-8.
Egilsson E, Bjarnason R, Njardvik U. Usage and Weekly Attrition in a Smartphone-Based Health Behavior Intervention for Adolescents: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Form Res. 2021 Feb 17;5(2):e21432. doi: 10.2196/21432.
Bear HA, Ayala Nunes L, DeJesus J, Liverpool S, Moltrecht B, Neelakantan L, Harriss E, Watkins E, Fazel M. Determination of Markers of Successful Implementation of Mental Health Apps for Young People: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res. 2022 Nov 9;24(11):e40347. doi: 10.2196/40347.
Egilsson E, Bjarnason R, Njardvik U. Usage and Daily Attrition of a Smartphone-Based Health Behavior Intervention: Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023 Jun 26;11:e45414. doi: 10.2196/45414.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
UI-2023-mHealth
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.