Prognostic Analyses on a Validation Series of Patients With Waldenström's Disease

NCT ID: NCT05911802

Last Updated: 2025-11-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

500 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-08-11

Study Completion Date

2030-06-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (WM) is defined by the association of bone marrow lymphoplasmocytic infiltration and monoclonal immunoglobulin M (IgM). A mutation in the MYD88 gene is found in up to 90% of patients, and a mutation in the CXCR4 gene in approximately one third of patients. Treatment should be initiated in cases of cytopenia, bulky disease or when the physicochemical or immunological properties of IgM explain the occurrence of amyloidosis, cryoglobulin, neurological manifestations, or hyperviscosity syndrome (due to the presence of a large amount of IgM). However, approximately 30% of patients are diagnosed without any symptom and therefore they do not meet the criteria for initiating treatment.

At the time of initiation of the first treatment, the prognosis is usually estimated with the International Prognostic Index (IPSSWM) which is based on five variables: age, platelet count, haemoglobin concentrations, β2-microglobulin and monoclonal component concentration. Serum albumin and lactate dehydrogénase (LDH) levels also retain a prognostic role and these two characteristics have been incorporated in a proposal for a revision of this index.

Improving prognostic assessment at the time of the first treatment initiation and taking into account the prognostic impact of events occurring in the course of evolution, should improve the strength of treatment decision at the time of initial treatment and during the follow-up. It should also help to design clinical trial for fast and effective evaluation of new treatments. Our work should also help to adjust clinical monitoring of asymptomatic patients.

Prospective and retrospective multicenter prognostic study with a descriptive objective, associated with a biological collection appropriately annotated and stored. A retrospective series including 470 patients with symptomatic WM is already available. The follow-up of these patients will be updated and an additional series of 250 symptomatic patients will be prospectively enrolled. 250 asymptomatic patients will be also enrolled.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (WM) is defined by the association of bone marrow lymphoplasmocytic infiltration and monoclonal immunoglobulin M (IgM). A mutation in the MYD88 gene is found in up to 90% of patients, and a mutation in the CXCR4 gene in approximately one third of patients. Treatment should be initiated in cases of cytopenia, bulky disease or when the physicochemical or immunological properties of IgM explain the occurrence of amyloidosis, cryoglobulin, neurological manifestations, or hyperviscosity syndrome (due to the presence of a large amount of IgM). However, approximately 30% of patients are diagnosed without any symptom and therefore they do not meet the criteria for initiating treatment.

The prognosis of asymptomatic patients can be estimated with a prognostic index based on serum albumin, β2-microglobulin, the monoclonal component concentration and the bone marrow infiltration. Prognostic assessment of these patients could be improved by taking into account prior the free light chain concentrations and the molecular characteristics of the disease.

At the time of initiation of the first treatment, the prognosis is usually estimated with the International Prognostic Index (IPSSWM) which is based on five variables: age, platelet count, haemoglobin concentrations, β2-microglobulin and monoclonal component concentration. Serum albumin and LDH levels also retain a prognostic role and these two characteristics have been incorporated in a proposal for a revision of this index.

Thus improving prognostic assessment in patients with WM may rest on the following strategies:

* Modifying the variables to be considered before treatment initiation, particularly by considering albumin and lactate dehydrogenase concentrations or molecular characteristics of the disease in symptomatic patients, free-light chain concentration in asymptomatic patients and molecular abnormalities in both categories of patients.
* Evaluating the prognostic impact of events occurring during the course of treatment, such as response or progression in symptomatic patients.

Improving prognostic assessment at the time of the first treatment initiation and taking into account the prognostic impact of events occurring in the course of evolution, should improve the strength of treatment decision at the time of initial treatment and during the follow-up. It should also help to design clinical trial for fast and effective evaluation of new treatments. Our work should also help to adjust clinical monitoring of asymptomatic patients.

Two large subgroups of patients properly included with validated information and updated follow-up will be considered, namely: symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. This project is based on the assumption that it should be possible for each of these two cohorts to:

1. validate a new prognostic system and compare its performance with previous systems
2. to participate in a large international study of the validity of a surrogate endpoint of survival after initiation of the 1st treatment

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Waldenstrom's Disease Prognostic Index

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

OTHER

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

symptomatic WM

WM patients with symptom(s) : cytopenia, bulky disease or when the physicochemical or immunological properties of IgM explain the occurrence of amyloidosis, cryoglobulin, neurological manifestations, or hyperviscosity syndrome (due to the presence of a large amount of IgM)

No interventions assigned to this group

asymptomatic WM

WM patients without any symptom

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient with WM, fulfilling the diagnostic criteria defined at the 2nd Workshop on WM.
* Patient in whom follow-up is available until at least 01/01/2020. Each participating center should not enroll more 10% of patients lost to follow-up.
* Patient for whom a minimum annual follow-up is planned until 2024.
* Having given their consent for this study

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient with other chronic lymphoid malignancy. Special attention will be paid to exclude other lymphoplasmacytic proliferations, especially marginal zone lymphoma.
* Patient with histological transformation in a diffuse large B-cell lymphoma or any other lymphoma at the time of the initiation of the 1st treatment.
* No consent for this study.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

French Innovative Leukemia Organisation

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

AMIENS - CH Amiens Picardie Site Sud

Amiens, , France

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Angers Chu

Angers, , France

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Institut Bergonie

Bordeaux, , France

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clermont-Ferrand - Chu Estaing

Clermont-Ferrand, , France

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Le Mans CH

Le Mans, , France

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

LENS - GHT Artois

Lens, , France

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

LIBOURNE - Hôpital Robert Boulin

Libourne, , France

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

LILLE GHICL - Hôpital Saint Vincent de Paul

Lille, , France

Site Status RECRUITING

Institut Paoli Calmette

Marseille, , France

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

APHP - Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière - Hématologie

Paris, , France

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

POITIERS - Hématologie et Thérapie Cellulaire

Poitiers, , France

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Reims Chu

Reims, , France

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Strasbourg - Icans

Strasbourg, , France

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Toulouse - IUCT Oncopole - Service d'Hématologie

Toulouse, , France

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

VERSAILLES - Hôpital André Mignot

Versailles, , France

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Lydia MONTES

Role: primary

Christopher NUNES-GOMES, MD

Role: primary

+33 2 41 35 45 24

Fontanet BIJOU, MD

Role: primary

+33556330448

Olivier TOURNILHAC, MD

Role: primary

Kamel Laribi, Dr

Role: primary

Daniela ROBU

Role: primary

Diane LARA

Role: primary

Bénédicte HIVERT, Dr

Role: primary

33 (0)3 20 87 45 32

Thérèse AURRAN, MD

Role: primary

+33491223667

Damien ROOS-WEIL, Pr

Role: primary

01 42 16 28 24

Cécile TOMOWIAK, Dr

Role: primary

05 49 44 43 07

Eric DUROT, Dr

Role: primary

Elise TOUSSAINT, MD

Role: primary

Loïc YSEBAERT, Pr

Role: primary

Fatiha MERABET, Dr

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Royston P, Altman DG. External validation of a Cox prognostic model: principles and methods. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Mar 6;13:33. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-33.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23496923 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

FILObs_SérieProWM

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

INS, B Cells and Microbiota
NCT04924712 RECRUITING