Ankle Trauma in Children, Application of Ottawa Ankle Rules From 5 Years Old, What is the Impact
NCT ID: NCT05910060
Last Updated: 2023-06-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
600 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2023-05-31
2024-02-29
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Our study is an evaluation of clinical practice. The aim is to assess the impact of the implementation of a new protocol using the Ottawa ankle rules from the age of 5. In particular, radiographic sparing and absence of diagnostic error.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Implementation of the Low Risk Ankle Rule
NCT00785876
Bedside Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Ankle Fractures in Children
NCT01341015
Evaluation of the Benefits of Ultrasound in Improving the Diagnosis and Management of Injuries the Child's Ankle
NCT03507972
Knee Injury Decision
NCT02856945
Single Time Management Diseases in Pediatric Traumatology
NCT03852095
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Secondary objectives (if applicable):
* Compare the time spent in the emergency room of patients before and after implementation of the protocol
* Evaluate the gain in terms of cost for the healthcare system
* Evaluate the adherence of caregivers to compliance with the protocol
* Evaluate the decrease in the rate of X-rays performed in different age groups.
* Evaluation of the consultation rate in the month for the same reason
Primary endpoint = X-ray rate as a % of X-rays performed on the number of children presenting to pediatric emergencies over the period studied (before implementation of the protocol in a similar period = May to October 2022 / after implementation of the protocol = May to October 2023) Secondary endpoints =
* Time spent in the emergency room in min
* Estimation of the cost for the healthcare system by taking the cost of an x-ray and evaluating the gain on the reduction in the rate of x-rays performed (number of x-rays - cost of an x-ray)
* Evaluation of caregiver compliance by measuring the number of X-rays performed outside the protocol (X-ray performed despite the absence of Ottawa criteria)
* X-ray rate by age group
* Spontaneous reconsultation rate within 1 month
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
before protocol
patients between 5 and 18 years of age consulting the paediatric emergency department for ankle trauma, before protocol implementation.
No interventions assigned to this group
after protocol
patients between 5 and 18 years of age consulting the paediatric emergency department for ankle trauma, after the implementation of the protocol
OTTAWA ANKLE RULES
count the ottawa score and do an x-ray if the score is greater than or equal to 1
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
OTTAWA ANKLE RULES
count the ottawa score and do an x-ray if the score is greater than or equal to 1
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* consulting in pediatric emergency in Nancy children hospital
* for ankle injury
Exclusion Criteria
5 Years
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Central Hospital, Nancy, France
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
GATIN Amélie
Pediatrician
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Amélie GATIN, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Central Hospital, Nancy, France
Ethan JEOL
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Central Hospital, Nancy, France
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
children hospital Nancy
Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, Meurthe-et-Moselle, France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2022PI174
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.