Single Time Management Diseases in Pediatric Traumatology

NCT ID: NCT03852095

Last Updated: 2019-07-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

150 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-11-02

Study Completion Date

2019-06-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A recent internal study evaluating the relevance of the visit to traumatology consultation in our establishment highlight that 49.3% of consultations were not relevant passages. The project consists of individualizing 5 to 6 pathologies and to create care sheets and patient sheets to be given to the care teams and patients when the pathology lends itself to it. The aim is to reduce the irrelevant passage rate during these consultations, which is the source of absence from iterative work for parents, collateral expenses (toll, parking), absence from school for the children, unjustified expenses and X-ray examination unnecessary most often.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The Pediatric Orthopedics and Traumatology department proposes a reform of the care in Traumatology of the children in order to improve and homogenize the care for a better relevance of these.

A recent internal study (June 2018) evaluating the relevance of the visit to traumatology consultation in our establishment to highlight that 49.3% of consultations were not relevant passages (Benign diseases of sprained ankle type, muscular contusion or simple bone removals). Indeed, these specialist consultations are currently filled by pathologies of simple treatment that do not require medical follow-up (neither clinical nor radiological follow-up).

The project consists of individualizing 5 to 6 pathologies found in consultation recurrently which the scientific literature has established that their follow-up is not justified, and to create care sheets and patient sheets to be given to the care teams and patients when the pathology lends itself to it. These cards will include all the management of the pathology of the definition itself, including the treatment and expected outcomes.

The aim is to reduce the irrelevant passage rate during these consultations, which is the source of absence from iterative work for parents, collateral expenses (toll, parking), absence from school for the children, unjustified expenses and X-ray examination unnecessary most often.

The expected benefit is parental and child satisfaction, a time saving for the practitioner that he can reinvest in consultations for patients who are in fact a specialist opinion and a relative budget saving for the establishment.

The method of study of the decline of irrelevant consultations will be made by a systematic review of each reason for consultation over a period of 3 months after implementation of the cards and study of the percentage of irrelevant consultation over the same period. The objective pursued is a drop in attendance of at least 25% of consultations deemed irrelevant in Traumatology, associated with a satisfaction rate of parents greater than 90%.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Fractures, Bone

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

minor trauma

Child from 1 to 18 years old suffering an isolated minor trauma presenting at the hospital emergency services.

minor trauma

Intervention Type OTHER

following the management of the patient's fracture in the emergency department, the patients / parents are recalled 2 months (J60) after the visit to the emergency room, and are interviewed by following the pre-established interrogation form, which checks the good agreement of the patient. treatment performed with the given sheet and recommendations, and assesses the satisfaction.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

minor trauma

following the management of the patient's fracture in the emergency department, the patients / parents are recalled 2 months (J60) after the visit to the emergency room, and are interviewed by following the pre-established interrogation form, which checks the good agreement of the patient. treatment performed with the given sheet and recommendations, and assesses the satisfaction.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

medical recommendation sheet

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 0-18 years
* Positive diagnosis of elbow haemarthrosis, radial salter 1 fracture, fibula fracture 1 fracture, radial butter ball fracture, simple ankle sprain, simple knee sprain, fracture of the middle third of the clavicle .........
* No other associated anomaly

Exclusion Criteria

* Refusal of the family ..............................................
* No understanding of the instructions ...............................
* Unaffiliated patient social security ..................................
* No French speaking .............
Minimum Eligible Age

1 Year

Maximum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Fondation Lenval

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

RAMPAL VIRGINIE, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Fondation Lenval - Nice Children Hospital CHU-Lenval

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Fondation Lenval Hopitaux Pediatriques de Nice Chu Lenval

Nice, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

18-HPNCL-06

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Effectiveness of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound
NCT03473249 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE4