Comparison of the Effects Suprascapular Nerve Block and Intra-articular Shoulder Injection

NCT ID: NCT05909462

Last Updated: 2023-06-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-01-21

Study Completion Date

2023-05-24

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Objectives: In this study, we aimed to compare the efficacy of ultrasonography-guided suprascapular nerve block and intra-articular shoulder injection treatment in terms of joint range of motion, pain and functional status in patients with adhesive capsulitis (AC).

Patients and Methods: 60 patients AC were included in our study. The patients were randomized into two groups according to the sealed envelope method. In the evaluation of the patients before the injection, age, gender, body mass index (BMI), occupation, education, duration of complaint, symptomatic side and dominant hand information were recorded. In the first group, 2 ml of 40 mg triamcinolone acetonide and 4 ml of 1% lidocaine injection were mixed with the posterior approach method into the shoulder joint under the guidance of ultrasonography (USG). The second group underwent suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) injection with 2 ml of 40 mg triamcinolone acetonide and 4 ml of 1% lidocaine under USG guidance. Shoulder range of motion (ROM), visual analog scale (VAS) scores and Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) scores were compared before the injection, on the tenth day after the injection and at the third month after the injection.

Conclusion: As a result of our study, although it was observed that both methods provided improvement in the treatment process, the significant improvement in the SSNB group indicates that it is a more reliable treatment method in AC treatment.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Sixty patients AC who applied to our Orthopedics-Traumatology and Physical Medicine-Rehabilitation Outpatient Clinic were included in our study. The study was approved by the Hitit University Clinical Research Ethics Committee (Decision number:2023-56). A well-informed written consent was obtained from all participants according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Patients with an age range of 18-65 years, adapting to the treatment program to be applied, diagnosed with unilateral stage 2-3 AC, no shoulder trauma in the last 3 months, no shoulder injections, no bleeding disorder, no history of malignancy, inflammatory disease and stroke were included in the study. The patients were randomized into two groups according to the sealed envelope method. In the evaluation of the patients before the injection, age, gender, body mass index (BMI), occupation, education, duration of complaint, symptomatic side and dominant hand information were recorded. Injections were made to the patients by the physiatrist and anesthetist researcher under the guidance of Logiq V2 portable USG device. In the first group, 2 ml of 40 mg triamcinolone acetonide and 4 ml of 1% lidocaine injection were mixed with the posterior approach method into the shoulder joint under the guidance of USG. The second group underwent suprascapular nerve block injection with 2 ml of 40 mg triamcinolone acetonide and 4 ml of 1% lidocaine under USG guidance. In addition, pendulum and ladder-finger exercises were given to both groups as a home exercise program. Shoulder range of motion (ROM), visual analog scale (VAS) scores and Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) scores were compared before the injection, on the tenth day after the injection and at the third month after the injection.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Adhesive Capsulitis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

randomized, controlled trial
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators
double blind randomized controlled

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

suprascapular verve block

2 ml of 40 mg triamcinolone acetonide and 4 ml of 1% lidocaine

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

2 ml of 40 mg triamcinolone acetonide and 4 ml of 1% lidocaine

Intervention Type DRUG

ultrasonography-guided suprascapular nerve block and intra-articular shoulder injection

intraarticular shoulder injection

2 ml of 40 mg triamcinolone acetonide and 4 ml of 1% lidocaine

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

2 ml of 40 mg triamcinolone acetonide and 4 ml of 1% lidocaine

Intervention Type DRUG

ultrasonography-guided suprascapular nerve block and intra-articular shoulder injection

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

2 ml of 40 mg triamcinolone acetonide and 4 ml of 1% lidocaine

ultrasonography-guided suprascapular nerve block and intra-articular shoulder injection

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

intra-articular shoulder injection

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

unilateral stage 2-3 AC

* no shoulder trauma in the last 3 months
* no shoulder injections
* no bleeding disorder
* no history of malignancy
* no history of inflammatory disease

Exlusion Criteria:

* malignancy
* inflammatory disease
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hitit University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ayse Gulsen Dogan

Specialist Doctor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hitit University

Çorum, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Deniz İpek

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

Mehmet Yalvaç

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

Murat Doğan

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

Abdulrahim Dündar

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2023-56

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.