Evaluation of the Efficacy of Suprascapular Nerve Block in Adhesive Capsulitis
NCT ID: NCT06176248
Last Updated: 2024-12-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
62 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-10-11
2027-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Adhesive capsulitis is a pathology that results in reduced shoulder mobility due to retraction of the periarticular capsule. It may be primary or secondary to traumatic or neurological events, or associated with diabetes in particular.
The usual treatment includes re-education sessions to improve joint amplitude and restore shoulder mobility. In persistent forms, intra-articular injection of cortisone is combined with distension of the capsule with a local anaesthetic under radiographic control.
In some countries, subscapular nerve block (reversible anaesthesia) is used to improve pain. The combination of arthrodistension and subscapular nerve block has never been performed to accelerate the healing process.
The aim of this study is to compare the performance of these two procedures together against the reference technique alone on time to improvement with the number of patients improved at one month according to the Constant score.
This score is used to assess shoulder pain and function, with a significant improvement above eight points.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Therapeutic management is currently poorly codified. Physiotherapy using active mobilization maneuvers has been shown to improve joint amplitudes, and is used as a first-line treatment. In the event of persistent symptoms, cortisone infiltration has been evaluated using a variety of protocols, including sub-acromial and intra-articular infiltration, as well as arthro-distension, which consists of dilating the capsule under radiological control using 1 intra-articular injection of xylocaine, corticoids and contrast medium. In France, arthrodistension has become the reference technique, as it is more effective than intra-articular infiltration of cortisone derivatives. In fact, several trials and meta-analyses have demonstrated short-term superiority in improving the pain associated with capsulitis and, above all, better progress in terms of joint amplitude, as assessed in particular by Constant's algo-functional scores.
If adhesive capsulitis persists despite these therapies, arthroscopic surgery is sometimes performed.
The suprascapular nerve is a mixed nerve whose sensitive component is the main sensitive branch innervating the shoulder. An anaesthetic block of this nerve provides a punctual reduction in painful sensations in the shoulder, enabling less painful arthrodistension and pain-free physiotherapy sessions for faster joint amplitude work. Several studies have compared suprascapular nerve block versus intra-articular infiltration in this condition, with conflicting results which nevertheless show a trend towards improved joint amplitudes and earlier onset of pain in the anesthetic block group. However, no study has compared suprascapular nerve block with arthrodistension, which remains the standard treatment in Europe. Moreover, no study has investigated the superiority of adding this therapy to arthrodistension. Our hypothesis is that suprascapular nerve block combined with arthrodistension may accelerate healing.
The main benefit expected for the patient is the shortening of the time to improvement (recovery of joint amplitudes, functional improvement and improvement in quality of life).
The expected benefits for society would be to improve therapeutic management and reduce healthcare consumption and indirect costs (time off work).
The foreseeable risks are low, with a risk of allergy to the anesthetic and a transient motor deficit (4h) in the supra-scapular nerve territory.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Block and arthrodistension
Triamcinolone Acetonide
1 injection of local anaesthetic (5 ml levobupivacaine 2.5 mg/mL) opposite the subscapular nerve, under ultrasound control, in a lateral decubitus or sitting position. Subsequently, they underwent Xray-controlled arthrodistension by injection of 1 ml of Triamcinolone Acetonide, combined with 10 ml of visipaque 270 contrast medium and 5 ml of Xylocaine.
Placebo and arthrodistension
saline solution
intramuscular injection of 1 ml saline under ultrasound control under the same conditions as the experimental group. Subsequently, they will undergo Xray-controlled arthrodistension under the same conditions as the experimental group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Triamcinolone Acetonide
1 injection of local anaesthetic (5 ml levobupivacaine 2.5 mg/mL) opposite the subscapular nerve, under ultrasound control, in a lateral decubitus or sitting position. Subsequently, they underwent Xray-controlled arthrodistension by injection of 1 ml of Triamcinolone Acetonide, combined with 10 ml of visipaque 270 contrast medium and 5 ml of Xylocaine.
saline solution
intramuscular injection of 1 ml saline under ultrasound control under the same conditions as the experimental group. Subsequently, they will undergo Xray-controlled arthrodistension under the same conditions as the experimental group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patient over 18 years of age
* Patient covered by a social security scheme
* Presence of an accompanying person on the day of the procedure for the return trip
* Patient having signed the consent form to participate in the study
Exclusion Criteria
* Pregnant women
* Patient who has had shoulder surgery less than six months old
* Patient unable to undergo rehabilitation within one month of surgery
* Allergy to one of the products used (anesthetic, iodinated contrast medium)
* Neuro-orthopedic disorder hampering clinical recovery
* Hemostasis disorder contraindicating block (no discontinuation of anticoagulants according to SFAR recommendations, congenital hemostasis disorder)
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
CHU de Reims
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Chu Reims
Reims, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Damien JOLLY
Role: primary
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PA23085*
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id