LEADing Dementia End-of-Life Planning Conversations

NCT ID: NCT05909189

Last Updated: 2025-05-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

120 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-08-04

Study Completion Date

2027-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Advance care planning is important for all adults, but perhaps even more so for the 5.7 million persons with Alzheimer's disease or related dementia (ADRD), due to the progressive and protracted cognitive deterioration associated with the disease process. In the context of ADRD, medical decision-making at the end of life is typically left to one's care partner, who often does not have the knowledge or confidence in their ability to make such decisions. This study will refine and evaluate a web-based platform, called the LEAD Intervention (Life-Planning in Early Alzheimer's and other Dementias), which is designed to help persons in the preclinical or early stage of ADRD engage in conversations about, document, and share their end-of-life values and preferences with a care partner, extended family members, and health care providers.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Advance care planning is the process that allows individuals to express their future healthcare values and preferences so that these wishes can be enacted in the event that they become incapacitated and unable to participate in their own healthcare decisions. In the case of Alzheimer's disease or related dementia (ADRD), the person with dementia (care recipient), almost inevitably loses decisional capacity toward the end of life, given the progressive decline in cognitive functioning that accompanies the disease over time. The care partners to persons with dementia, most often family members such as spouse/partners and adult children, are therefore tasked with making end-of-life decisions on behalf of the care recipient with ADRD. These care partners are not always well-informed of the care recipient's end-of-life values and preferences and therefore may not feel confident in their ability to make decisions regarding care and treatment at the end-of-life, resulting in unnecessary, futile, and often unwanted medical treatments and interventions. Oftentimes, families do not want to engage in these challenging conversations and wait too long, whereby the care recipient with ADRD no longer has the decisional ability to participate in the advance care planning process. We developed "The LEAD Guide" (Life-Planning in Early Alzheimer's and other Dementias), as a tool to help persons with preclinical awareness of ADRD risk and those with early-stage cognitive impairment to begin these important conversations with a care partner. In this NIH Stage-1 behavioral intervention study we will refine the LEAD Intervention based on our pilot work (Stage 1A) and then evaluate the usability, acceptability, feasibility, and initial efficacy of the LEAD Intervention (Stage 1B). We will recruit a diverse sample of 60 community-dwelling ADRD pairs, defined as a care recipient in the preclinical or early stage of ADRD, plus their current or anticipated care partner (i.e., spouse/partner or adult child). Results are expected to show that the LEAD Intervention can improve outcomes related to decision-making self-efficacy through greater advance care planning congruence and improve subjective well-being, anxiety, and relationship quality as perceived and reported by both the care recipient and the care partner. Results from this study have the potential to guide and accelerate the implementation of the LEAD Intervention in community and healthcare practice, where a dementia-focused advance care process is needed.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Alzheimer Disease Mild Cognitive Impairment

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

The LEAD Intervention is a web-baed platform that integrates the LEAD Guide with self-paced educational modules that guide care recipient-care partner pairs through conversations and the process of dementia-focused advance care planning. The aims of this study are: 1. To describe the acceptability, usability, and feasibility of the LEAD Intervention. Methods: Conduct a process evaluation using survey-based outcome assessments and qualitative analysis of participant-recorded advance care planning conversation(s)to identify facilitators and/or barriers to intervention participation. 2. To assess the initial efficacy of the LEAD Intervention on the primary outcome and secondary outcomes as perceived by both the care recipient and the care partner. 3. To examine advance care planning congruence as a mechanism of action for the LEAD Intervention.
Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

ADRD dyads

This is a single-arm study enrolling 60 ADRD community-based dyads.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

LEADing Dementia End-of-Life Planning Conversations

Intervention Type OTHER

The LEAD Intervention is self-administered and delivered through an interactive, web-based platform designed according to recommended functionalities and user-designed principles. Through three distinct modules, the LEAD Intervention will facilitate the advance care planning processes of 1) defining care recipients' values and preferences for care, 2) developing advance care planning congruence within the pair, or a shared understanding of the care recipient's values and preferences, through conversation(s), and 3) encouraging ongoing advance care planning conversation and documentation that can be shared beyond the pair. All modules will include video tutorials to introduce the goals and tasks as well as provide interactive resources to provide support and education relevant to the content of each module. The three modules are intended to be followed in a sequential pattern.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

LEADing Dementia End-of-Life Planning Conversations

The LEAD Intervention is self-administered and delivered through an interactive, web-based platform designed according to recommended functionalities and user-designed principles. Through three distinct modules, the LEAD Intervention will facilitate the advance care planning processes of 1) defining care recipients' values and preferences for care, 2) developing advance care planning congruence within the pair, or a shared understanding of the care recipient's values and preferences, through conversation(s), and 3) encouraging ongoing advance care planning conversation and documentation that can be shared beyond the pair. All modules will include video tutorials to introduce the goals and tasks as well as provide interactive resources to provide support and education relevant to the content of each module. The three modules are intended to be followed in a sequential pattern.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Care Recipient (CR) is age 50+
* CR Is interested in having conversations about and documenting wishes for future end-of-life care
* CR has noticed changes in memory or thinking skills indicative of preclinical or early stage of AD, OR
* CR has been diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment, Alzheimer's disease, or another type of dementia and in the preclinical or early stage
* Care Partner (CP) is age 18+
* CP is a Spouse/partner, family member, or close friend of CR

Exclusion Criteria

* Has moderate to severe symptoms of dementia
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institute on Aging (NIA)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Utah

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Kara Dassel

Professor, Assistant Dean

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Kara Dassel, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Utah

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Utah College of Nursing

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Kara Dassel, PhD

Role: CONTACT

801-646-4667

Nancy Aruscavage, MS

Role: CONTACT

8015877353

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Nancy Aruscavage

Role: primary

801-587-7353

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Dassel KB, Utz R, Supiano K, McGee N, Latimer S. The Influence of Hypothetical Death Scenarios on Multidimensional End-of-Life Care Preferences. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2018 Jan;35(1):52-59. doi: 10.1177/1049909116680990. Epub 2016 Dec 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28273753 (View on PubMed)

Supiano KP, McGee N, Dassel KB, Utz R. A Comparison of the Influence of Anticipated Death Trajectory and Personal Values on End-of-Life Care Preferences: A Qualitative Analysis. Clin Gerontol. 2019 May-Jun;42(3):247-258. doi: 10.1080/07317115.2017.1365796. Epub 2017 Oct 9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28990872 (View on PubMed)

Dassel K, Utz R, Supiano K, Bybee S, Iacob E. Development of a Dementia-Focused End-of-Life Planning Tool: The LEAD Guide (Life-Planning in Early Alzheimer's and Dementia). Innov Aging. 2019 Aug 2;3(3):igz024. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igz024. eCollection 2019 Jul.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31392286 (View on PubMed)

Clayton JL, Utz RL, Aruscavage N, Bybee SG, Bigger SE, Iacob E, Dassel KB. Using community engagement with FRAME: Framework for reporting adaptations and modifications to evidence-based interventions. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2024 Nov 26;42:101398. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101398. eCollection 2024 Dec.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39717518 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

5R01AG069033-03

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

GRANT13319762

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.