Impact of the Placebo Effect on the Effects of Trancranial Direct Current Stimulation in Fibromyalgia
NCT ID: NCT05903079
Last Updated: 2026-01-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-03-05
2025-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Impact of Susceptibility to Placebo on the Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in Fibromyalgia
NCT05845528
Long Term Home Based tDCS in Fibromyalgia
NCT03843203
Cortical Excitability Modulation With ctDCS in Fibromyalgia.
NCT05963321
Home-based Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Fibromyalgia Patients
NCT02652988
Neuromodulatory Effects of Transcranial Pulsed Current Stimulation in Fibromyalgia
NCT05321693
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Although the results with the use of tDCS have been promising in the treatment of several chronic pain conditions, as demonstrated in a recent meta-analysis conducted by the Pain and Neuromodulation research group at Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (Zortea et al., 2019). ) it is necessary to consider that expectations about pain can directly affect nociceptive processing. Such expectations contribute to the placebo effect that has been shown to be mediated by opioids. The study by Eippert et al. (2009) showed that naloxone administration reduces the neural and behavioral effects of placebo, as well as placebo-induced responses in several cortical and subcortical areas that constitute the descending pain modulatory system (e.g., rACC, PAG, RVM, and hypothalamus). ). Furthermore, it abolished the rACC-PAG coupling induced by the placebo intervention. The expectation of placebo-induced analgesia is positively correlated with the availability of MOR. On the contrary, negative suggestion reduces the analgesic effects of synthetic opiates. All these findings support the close association between opioids and expectations that drive placebo-mediated analgesia.
Therefore, this clinical trial aims to compare the effectiveness of anodal tDCS applied to the primary motor cortex (M1) compared to sham tDCS in FM, according to susceptibility to the placebo effect and serum endorphin levels, in the following results ( 1) treatment efficacy, which includes daily measurements recorded in a Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) application, which allows assessing pain from a multidimensional perspective (pain intensity and interference with general activities, mood, mobility, work, personal relationships, sleep and enjoyment of life, etc.) (primary outcome), the primary outcome will be the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) score, which assesses pain levels, sleep quality, mood, fatigue, disability, use of analgesics, etc. Secondary outcomes are the impact of pain on quality of life, depressive symptoms. Predictors of the placebo effect will also be evaluated, through the Verbal Numerical Pain Scale (NPS, 0-10) scores in the last week and through the BPI scores, using a multiple hierarchical model. Among potential predictors, there is disability due to pain, psychological profile, drugs in use. In addition to these, the index of inflammatory markers (serum interleukins IL1-, IL-6, IL-10; TNF-alpha and C-reactive protein); serum levels of endorphins, brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), S-100B protein and the polymorphisms Val66Met of the BDNF gene and Val158Met of the COMT enzyme gene. Will be included 100 women with FM, randomized to receive active (n=50) or sham (n=50) tDCS, aged between 18 and 65 years. Randomization will be stratified according to the placebo effect response potential, determined after a simulated tDCS session. A variation in NPS (0-10) equal to or greater than 30% after a simulated tDCS session will classify them as high responders to the placebo effect. The follow-up time will be four weeks after a single treatment session. In this way, it is intended to produce consistent evidence for the use of this low-cost technique in the treatment of patients of the Unified Health System, which will be directed to patients with chronic pain at the same time, which will provide data to subsidize the feasibility of studying the effect of this complementary therapy in other conditions, such as refractory depression and neurorehabilitation. In addition, to provide data to better understand tDCS response predictors in outcomes that are related to the impact of pain on the quality of life of conditions that generate a lot of suffering and high costs to the health system.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Respondres placebo effect
Braço: Comparador de placebo: responde ao efeito placebo Intervenção: 'Estimulação Transcraniana por Corrente Contínua - tDCS
Os pacientes receberão tratamento de estimulação tDCS córtex motor primário (M1).
De acordo com o sistema 10-20 EEG, o ânodo será colocado no F3 esquerdo e o cátodo no FP2 direito.
A estimulação placebo utiliza uma corrente de 2 miliamperes durante os primeiros minutos, nos 10 min e nos 19 minutos.
s-Tdcs
In the sham condition, a 2 mA current is applied only during brief ramp-up and ramp-down periods at the beginning of the session and at predefined time points (10 and 19 minutes), without sustained stimulation.
In the active condition, a continuous 2 mA current is delivered for 20 minutes.
No Respondres placebo effect
Braço: Comparador de placebo: responde ao efeito placebo Intervenção: 'Estimulação Transcraniana por Corrente Contínua - tDCS
Os pacientes receberão tratamento de estimulação tDCS córtex motor primário (M1).De acordo com o sistema 10-20 EEG, o ânodo será colocado no F3 esquerdo e o cátodo no FP2 direitol.
A estimulação placebo utiliza uma corrente de 2 miliamperes durante os primeiros minutos, nos 10 min e nos 19 minutos
s-Tdcs
In the sham condition, a 2 mA current is applied only during brief ramp-up and ramp-down periods at the beginning of the session and at predefined time points (10 and 19 minutes), without sustained stimulation.
In the active condition, a continuous 2 mA current is delivered for 20 minutes.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
s-Tdcs
In the sham condition, a 2 mA current is applied only during brief ramp-up and ramp-down periods at the beginning of the session and at predefined time points (10 and 19 minutes), without sustained stimulation.
In the active condition, a continuous 2 mA current is delivered for 20 minutes.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
65 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Wolnei Caumo
Professor, surgery departament
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Wolnei Caumo, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
20220596
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.