Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
84 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-06-01
2021-01-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Our hypothesis is that tDCS has a superior effect on clinical outcomes, functional capacity, cortical excitability, and psycho-affective functions compared to simulated treatment. In order to respond to the objectives of this study, a randomized, parallel-blinded clinical trial will be conducted. FM patients will be randomized to receive tDCS with anodic pole on the primary motor cortex and the cathode pole on the contralateral prefrontal cortex.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Impact of Susceptibility to Placebo on the Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in Fibromyalgia
NCT05845528
Home-based Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Fibromyalgia Patients
NCT02652988
Impact of the Placebo Effect on the Effects of Trancranial Direct Current Stimulation in Fibromyalgia
NCT05903079
Neuromodulatory Effects of Transcranial Pulsed Current Stimulation in Fibromyalgia
NCT05321693
Cortical Excitability Modulation With ctDCS in Fibromyalgia.
NCT05963321
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
What is known so far is that the peripheral mechanisms contribute to the FM frame, but the central component surely commands the process, because the peripheral component does not explain ubiquitous fatigue, sleep problems, depressed mood and memory, catastrophic thinking, which are invariably as or more relevant than the pain of superficial structures. Diffuse hyperalgesia, allodynia, and the summation effect are added to the symptoms mentioned. Such symptoms are part of the central sensitization. Among dysfunctional FM processes, functional alterations of the motor cortex and its connections with subcortical structures that constitute the neuromatrix of pain have been demonstrated, as well as quantitative and qualitative alterations in fine sensitive fibers of the peripheral nervous system. Based on this complex nature of FM, the objective of this research is to obtain greater clarity about its pathophysiology and to identify distinctions between subgroups of patients with a view to advancing diagnosis and treatment, aiming at individualized therapy and improving outcomes, thereby attenuating , the significant loss to patients' lives and the heavy social and economic burden to patients and society.
As for the current therapeutic approach, in addition to drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) - duloxetine, milnacipran and pregabalin) the target has been techniques that may modify the dysfunctional neuroplasticity process, such as transcranial direct current stimulation tDCS) in order to counter-regulate the dysfunction responsible for triggering and maintaining FM symptoms. Although this technique is gaining space in the research and in the clinical scenario, many questions remain to be answered, such as: time of treatment, place to be stimulated (assembly method), how to perform maintenance therapy and benefit time after treatment, and, above all, which techniques could produce an additive effect (eg, physical activity, cognitive and pharmacological activity). From the presented scenario, the present project was organized, which is characterized as a clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and the effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and the dose (in the sessions) in the treatment of FM, with measures of pain, functional capacity and function of the descending pain modulator system as the outcomes. Also, potential predictors of (tDCS) response in primary outcomes will be: (a) Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) parameters (motor evoked potential (MEP), intracortical inhibition (ICI), intracortical facilitation (ICF) and silent period (CSP)) ; (b) serum levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and its polymorphisms for the G (Val; / Met) alleles, as well as levels of the S100B protein; (c) level of central sensitization, catastrophism of pain and depressive symptoms.
In order to respond to the objectives of this study, a randomized, parallel-blinded clinical trial with 60 female patients with FM, diagnosed according to the criteria of the American Society of Rheumatology (2010 - revised in 2016), age between 19 and 65 years old, who will be randomized to receive tDCS with anodic pole on the primary motor cortex and the cathode pole on the contralateral prefrontal cortex. The sessions will last 20 min, the current intensity will be 2 milliamperes, with anodic pole on the primary motor cortex and the cathode pole on the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex of the left hemisphere. Patients will receive, in addition to training to administer home-based (tDCS) treatment, written instructions on physical exercises suggested by the investigator. The duration of treatment will be 8 weeks and a follow-up time after the end of the 12-week stimulation as recommended by the Initiative on Methods, Measurement and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials (IMMPACT). Patients should respond daily to two questionnaires, one on the type of exercise performed and the duration of the exercises and another on the possible side effects of the tDCS. The home tDCS will be carried out with equipment developed by the research group coordinated by the proponent of this project, in partnership with the Biomedical Engineering of the Hospital of Clinics of Porto Alegre (HCPA), with a patent application with the National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI) under the number BR2020150164500. In addition to the possible contribution to knowledge production, this project aims to transfer the technology acquired and developed to the community, and in this way, it can benefit millions of people suffering from chronic FM pain with limited diagnostic and therapeutic perspective. In addition, to provide a cost-effective therapeutic technique for phase III studies on the use of large-scale home-based tDCS, a technique that can be extended to several neuropsychiatric conditions, such as depression and besides being able to assist as an adjuvant in the rehabilitation of sequelae of cerebral ischemia. Our hypothesis is that tDCS has a superior effect on clinical outcomes, functional capacity, cortical excitability, and psycho-affective functions compared to simulated treatment.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
s-tDCS
\- Intervention: 'Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation - tDCS The patients will receive tDCS sham treatment. The patients will receive sham tDCS treatment over primary motor cortex. According to 10-20 EEG system, anode will be placed at left C3 and cathode at o contralateral F3. In sham stimulation the device only release flow current, in the first 30 s of session and in the remaining 30s in the end of the session, during 20 minutes.
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation - tDCS
\- Intervention: tDCS is a therapeutic method that modulates the membrane potential, where anodic stimuli induce cortical excitability and cathodic stimuli reduce it
M1 a-tDCS
* Intervention: 'Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation - tDCS
* The patients will receive tDCS active treatment over primary motor cortex.
* According to 10-20 EEG system, anode will be placed at left C3 and cathode at contralateral supraorbital Fp2.
* Active stimulation uses a 2 milliamperes current during 20 minutes.
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation - tDCS
\- Intervention: tDCS is a therapeutic method that modulates the membrane potential, where anodic stimuli induce cortical excitability and cathodic stimuli reduce it
DLPFC a-tDCS
* Intervention: 'Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation - tDCS
* The patients will receive tDCS active treatment over dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.
* According to 10-20 EEG system, anode will be placed at left F3 and cathode at contralateral F4.
* Active stimulation uses a 2 milliamperes current during 20 minutes.
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation - tDCS
\- Intervention: tDCS is a therapeutic method that modulates the membrane potential, where anodic stimuli induce cortical excitability and cathodic stimuli reduce it
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation - tDCS
\- Intervention: tDCS is a therapeutic method that modulates the membrane potential, where anodic stimuli induce cortical excitability and cathodic stimuli reduce it
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Pain score equal to or greater than six on the Numerical Pain Scale (NPS 0-10) on most days of the last 3 months.
Exclusion Criteria
* Pregnancy
* Contraindications to TMS and tDCS: metallic implant in the brain; medical devices implanted in the brain, cardiac pacemaker; cochlear implant;
* History of alcohol or drug abuse in the last 6 months; neurological diseases; history of head trauma or neurosurgery; decompensated systemic diseases, and chronic inflammatory diseases (lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, Sjogren's syndrome, Reiter's syndrome); uncompensated hypothyroidism; personal history of cancer, past or under treatment.
30 Years
65 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Wolnei Caumo
Professor, M.D, PhD.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Wolnei Caumo, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Clauw DJ, Arnold LM, McCarberg BH; FibroCollaborative. The science of fibromyalgia. Mayo Clin Proc. 2011 Sep;86(9):907-11. doi: 10.4065/mcp.2011.0206.
Keeser D, Meindl T, Bor J, Palm U, Pogarell O, Mulert C, Brunelin J, Moller HJ, Reiser M, Padberg F. Prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation changes connectivity of resting-state networks during fMRI. J Neurosci. 2011 Oct 26;31(43):15284-93. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0542-11.2011.
Silva AF, Zortea M, Carvalho S, Leite J, Torres IL, Fregni F, Caumo W. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex modulates attention and pain in fibromyalgia: randomized clinical trial. Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 9;7(1):135. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-00185-w.
Zanette SA, Dussan-Sarria JA, Souza A, Deitos A, Torres IL, Caumo W. Higher serum S100B and BDNF levels are correlated with a lower pressure-pain threshold in fibromyalgia. Mol Pain. 2014 Jul 8;10:46. doi: 10.1186/1744-8069-10-46.
Lopes Alves R, Zortea M, Vicuna Serrano P, Laranjeira VDS, Franceschini Tocchetto B, Ramalho L, Fernanda da Silveira Alves C, Brugnera Tomedi R, Pereira de Almeida R, Machado Bruck S, Medeiros L, R S Sanches P, P Silva D Jr, Torres ILS, Fregni F, Caumo W. Modulation of neural networks and symptom correlated in fibromyalgia: A randomized double-blind multi-group explanatory clinical trial of home-based transcranial direct current stimulation. PLoS One. 2024 Nov 13;19(11):e0288830. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288830. eCollection 2024.
Caumo W, Lopes Ramos R, Vicuna Serrano P, da Silveira Alves CF, Medeiros L, Ramalho L, Tomeddi R, Bruck S, Boher L, Sanches PRS, Silva DP Jr, Ls Torres I, Fregni F. Efficacy of Home-Based Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Over the Primary Motor Cortex and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in the Disability Due to Pain in Fibromyalgia: A Factorial Sham-Randomized Clinical Study. J Pain. 2024 Feb;25(2):376-392. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2023.09.001. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
Serrano PV, Zortea M, Alves RL, Beltran G, Bavaresco C, Ramalho L, Alves CFDS, Medeiros L, Sanches PRS, Silva DP Jr, Lucena da Silva Torres I, Fregni F, Caumo W. The effect of home-based transcranial direct current stimulation in cognitive performance in fibromyalgia: A randomized, double-blind sham-controlled trial. Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Nov 24;16:992742. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.992742. eCollection 2022.
Caumo W, Alves RL, Vicuna P, Alves CFDS, Ramalho L, Sanches PRS, Silva DP, da Silva Torres IL, Fregni F. Impact of Bifrontal Home-Based Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Pain Catastrophizing and Disability due to Pain in Fibromyalgia: A Randomized, Double-Blind Sham-Controlled Study. J Pain. 2022 Apr;23(4):641-656. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2021.11.002. Epub 2021 Nov 13.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2017-0330
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.