EUS-GBD vs Antibiotics for Patients at High Risk for Cholecystectomy
NCT ID: NCT05893511
Last Updated: 2025-08-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
PHASE3
110 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-04-26
2025-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Hypothesis to be tested The aim is to compare EUS-GBD versus standard protocol (antibiotics first) as a definitive treatment, in very high-risk patients suffering from mild to moderate acute cholecystitis. We hypothesize that EUS-GBD can reduce the 1-year risk of recurrent acute cholecystitis.
Design and subjects This is an international randomised controlled study including consecutive patients suffering from acute cholecystitis that are very high-risk for cholecystectomy. The patients would be randomized to receive EUS-GBD or antibiotics first.
Interventions: EUS-GBD versus antibiotics
Main outcome measures:
The primary outcome is the rate of recurrent acute cholecystitis in 1 year. Other outcomes include technical and clinical success, post-procedural pain scores, analgesic requirements, adverse events, re-admissions, re-interventions, quality of life and cost analysis.
Data analysis All outcomes would be analysed according to the intention-to-treat principle. Kaplan-Meier method with the log-rank test will be used to compare differences in recurrent acute cholecystitis in 1 year. A health economic analysis will also be performed. Assuming a 17.1% difference in recurrent acute cholecystitis rates, a 2-sided P value of 0.05, a power of 80%, and a 10% dropout rate, 110 patients is required.
Expected results The findings of this study can help establish the role of EUS-GBD in management of high-risk patients suffering from acute cholecystitis over antibiotics alone and Percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Ejection Fraction of Normal Gall Bladder on Ultrasonography in Patients With Biliary Colic: Is it a Predictor of Cholecystectomy?
NCT05587933
Effectiveness of Empirical Antibiotic Use in Mild to Moderate Acute Inflammatory Gallbladder Disease
NCT05339282
Early Versus Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis
NCT07101315
Drainage or Not for Laparoscopic Cholecystetomy
NCT03909360
Ultrasonically Activated Scalpel Versus Electrocautery Based Dissection in Acute Cholecystitis Trial
NCT03014817
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Antibiotics first group
Antibiotics first equals to intravenous antibiotics 2nd generation cephalosporin or equivalent). Antibiotics would first be given parenterally and then switched to oral form when patient can tolerate diet or when sepsis subside. It will be continued for at least a total of 7 days.
Antibiotics first
Patients randomized to antibiotics first would be given intravenous antibiotics 2nd generation cephalosporin or equivalent). Antibiotics would first be given parenterally and then switched to oral form when patient can tolerate diet or when sepsis subside. It will be continued for at least a total of 7 days.
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD)
Prior to the procedure, the patients would be kept fasted for 6 hours and antibiotics would be commenced (2nd generation cephalosporin or equivalent). Antibiotics would be continued for up to one week after the procedure.EUS-GBD would be performed by either the conventional or direct method.
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage
Prior to the procedure, the patients would be kept fasted for 6 hours and antibiotics would be commenced (2nd generation cephalosporin or equivalent). EUS-GBD would be performed by either the conventional or direct method. A 10mm stent system would be used if the largest gallstone is smaller than 10mm in size and a 16mm stent is used if the largest gallstone is larger than 10mm. The distal flange of the stent would be deployed under EUS guidance, followed by deployment of the proximal flange under endoscopic guidance. Once deployed, the gallbladder is completely emptied by suction and irrigation until the effluent through the stent is clean. The need of inserting an additional double pigtail plastic stent through the LAMS would be decided by the endosonographer. A course of antibiotics will be continued for 7 days after the procedure .
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage
Prior to the procedure, the patients would be kept fasted for 6 hours and antibiotics would be commenced (2nd generation cephalosporin or equivalent). EUS-GBD would be performed by either the conventional or direct method. A 10mm stent system would be used if the largest gallstone is smaller than 10mm in size and a 16mm stent is used if the largest gallstone is larger than 10mm. The distal flange of the stent would be deployed under EUS guidance, followed by deployment of the proximal flange under endoscopic guidance. Once deployed, the gallbladder is completely emptied by suction and irrigation until the effluent through the stent is clean. The need of inserting an additional double pigtail plastic stent through the LAMS would be decided by the endosonographer. A course of antibiotics will be continued for 7 days after the procedure .
Antibiotics first
Patients randomized to antibiotics first would be given intravenous antibiotics 2nd generation cephalosporin or equivalent). Antibiotics would first be given parenterally and then switched to oral form when patient can tolerate diet or when sepsis subside. It will be continued for at least a total of 7 days.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Suffering from grade 1 or 2 acute calculous cholecystitis\*
3. At very high-risk for early laparoscopic cholecystectomy due to poor premorbid conditions\*\* or elderly patients suffering from acute cholecystitis but refused operations
Exclusion Criteria
* Pregnancy
* Patients unwilling to undergo follow-up assessments
* Patients with suspected gangrene or perforation of the gallbladder
* Grade III acute cholecystitis33
* Patients diagnosed with concomitant liver abscess or pancreatitis (defined as elevated serum amylase more than three times the upper limit of normal)
* Altered anatomy of the upper gastrointestinal tract due to surgery of the esophagus, stomach and duodenum
* Patients with liver cirrhosis, portal hypertension and/or gastric varices
* Abnormal coagulation: International normalized ratio (INR) \> 1.5 and/or platelets \< 50.000/mm3
* Previous drainage of the gallbladder
* Patients suffering acute cholecystitis due to malignant cystic duct obstruction
* Patients with life expectancy of less than 3 years
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Chinese University of Hong Kong
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
CHAN SHANNON MELISSA
Assistant Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Shannon Melissa Chan
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The Chinese Universtiy of Hong Kong
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The Chinese Universtiy of Hong Kong
Hong Kong, , Hong Kong
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2022.518
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.