EUS-GBD vs Antibiotics for Patients at High Risk for Cholecystectomy

NCT ID: NCT05893511

Last Updated: 2025-08-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

110 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-04-26

Study Completion Date

2025-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Objectives Acute cholecystitis commonly occurs in elderly patients who are at high-risk for surgery. Whether upfront Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) is advantageous over antibiotics first for mild acute cholecystitis is uncertain.

Hypothesis to be tested The aim is to compare EUS-GBD versus standard protocol (antibiotics first) as a definitive treatment, in very high-risk patients suffering from mild to moderate acute cholecystitis. We hypothesize that EUS-GBD can reduce the 1-year risk of recurrent acute cholecystitis.

Design and subjects This is an international randomised controlled study including consecutive patients suffering from acute cholecystitis that are very high-risk for cholecystectomy. The patients would be randomized to receive EUS-GBD or antibiotics first.

Interventions: EUS-GBD versus antibiotics

Main outcome measures:

The primary outcome is the rate of recurrent acute cholecystitis in 1 year. Other outcomes include technical and clinical success, post-procedural pain scores, analgesic requirements, adverse events, re-admissions, re-interventions, quality of life and cost analysis.

Data analysis All outcomes would be analysed according to the intention-to-treat principle. Kaplan-Meier method with the log-rank test will be used to compare differences in recurrent acute cholecystitis in 1 year. A health economic analysis will also be performed. Assuming a 17.1% difference in recurrent acute cholecystitis rates, a 2-sided P value of 0.05, a power of 80%, and a 10% dropout rate, 110 patients is required.

Expected results The findings of this study can help establish the role of EUS-GBD in management of high-risk patients suffering from acute cholecystitis over antibiotics alone and Percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Cholecystitis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Antibiotics first group

Antibiotics first equals to intravenous antibiotics 2nd generation cephalosporin or equivalent). Antibiotics would first be given parenterally and then switched to oral form when patient can tolerate diet or when sepsis subside. It will be continued for at least a total of 7 days.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Antibiotics first

Intervention Type DRUG

Patients randomized to antibiotics first would be given intravenous antibiotics 2nd generation cephalosporin or equivalent). Antibiotics would first be given parenterally and then switched to oral form when patient can tolerate diet or when sepsis subside. It will be continued for at least a total of 7 days.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD)

Prior to the procedure, the patients would be kept fasted for 6 hours and antibiotics would be commenced (2nd generation cephalosporin or equivalent). Antibiotics would be continued for up to one week after the procedure.EUS-GBD would be performed by either the conventional or direct method.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Prior to the procedure, the patients would be kept fasted for 6 hours and antibiotics would be commenced (2nd generation cephalosporin or equivalent). EUS-GBD would be performed by either the conventional or direct method. A 10mm stent system would be used if the largest gallstone is smaller than 10mm in size and a 16mm stent is used if the largest gallstone is larger than 10mm. The distal flange of the stent would be deployed under EUS guidance, followed by deployment of the proximal flange under endoscopic guidance. Once deployed, the gallbladder is completely emptied by suction and irrigation until the effluent through the stent is clean. The need of inserting an additional double pigtail plastic stent through the LAMS would be decided by the endosonographer. A course of antibiotics will be continued for 7 days after the procedure .

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage

Prior to the procedure, the patients would be kept fasted for 6 hours and antibiotics would be commenced (2nd generation cephalosporin or equivalent). EUS-GBD would be performed by either the conventional or direct method. A 10mm stent system would be used if the largest gallstone is smaller than 10mm in size and a 16mm stent is used if the largest gallstone is larger than 10mm. The distal flange of the stent would be deployed under EUS guidance, followed by deployment of the proximal flange under endoscopic guidance. Once deployed, the gallbladder is completely emptied by suction and irrigation until the effluent through the stent is clean. The need of inserting an additional double pigtail plastic stent through the LAMS would be decided by the endosonographer. A course of antibiotics will be continued for 7 days after the procedure .

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Antibiotics first

Patients randomized to antibiotics first would be given intravenous antibiotics 2nd generation cephalosporin or equivalent). Antibiotics would first be given parenterally and then switched to oral form when patient can tolerate diet or when sepsis subside. It will be continued for at least a total of 7 days.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Consecutive patients aged ≥ 18 years old
2. Suffering from grade 1 or 2 acute calculous cholecystitis\*
3. At very high-risk for early laparoscopic cholecystectomy due to poor premorbid conditions\*\* or elderly patients suffering from acute cholecystitis but refused operations

Exclusion Criteria

Patients with the following conditions are excluded from the study:

* Pregnancy
* Patients unwilling to undergo follow-up assessments
* Patients with suspected gangrene or perforation of the gallbladder
* Grade III acute cholecystitis33
* Patients diagnosed with concomitant liver abscess or pancreatitis (defined as elevated serum amylase more than three times the upper limit of normal)
* Altered anatomy of the upper gastrointestinal tract due to surgery of the esophagus, stomach and duodenum
* Patients with liver cirrhosis, portal hypertension and/or gastric varices
* Abnormal coagulation: International normalized ratio (INR) \> 1.5 and/or platelets \< 50.000/mm3
* Previous drainage of the gallbladder
* Patients suffering acute cholecystitis due to malignant cystic duct obstruction
* Patients with life expectancy of less than 3 years
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Chinese University of Hong Kong

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

CHAN SHANNON MELISSA

Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Shannon Melissa Chan

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

The Chinese Universtiy of Hong Kong

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The Chinese Universtiy of Hong Kong

Hong Kong, , Hong Kong

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Hong Kong

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Shannon Melissa Chan

Role: CONTACT

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Shannon M Chan, MBCHB, FRCS

Role: primary

Anthony YB Teoh, MBCHB, FRCS

Role: backup

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2022.518

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Bile Aspiration vs Drain in Acute Cholecystitis
NCT03012243 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA