Accuracy of Surgeon-performed Ultrasound in Detecting Gallstones - a Validation Study

NCT ID: NCT02469935

Last Updated: 2015-06-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

300 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-10-31

Study Completion Date

2012-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Aims: To prospectively investigate the accuracy of surgeon-performed ultrasound for the detection of gallstones.

Methods: 179 adult patients, with an acute or elective referral for an abdominal ultrasound examination, were examined with a right upper quadrant ultrasound scan by a radiologist as well as surgeon. The surgeons had undergone a four-week long education in ultrasound before participating in the study. Ultrasound findings of the surgeon were compared to those of the radiologist, using radiologist-performed ultrasound as reference standard.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Enrolment of patients:

Three hundred patients, with an acute or elective referral to the radiology department at Stockholm South General Hospital, Sweden, for any diagnostic abdominal US examination, including both patients admitted to in-hospital care and out-patients, were prospectively enrolled between October 2011 and November 2012. Eligible patients were identified in the radiology department by a study surgeon and informed consent was obtained. Six US educated surgeons participated in the enrolment of patients. Exclusion criteria were age \<18 years or inability to communicate with the examiner. Referrals concerning metastases of the liver or contrast-enhanced examinations were considered not suitable for the study and were also excluded. The surgeons examined patients consecutively if time was available, but mostly they didn't have time to examine every patient referred per day, hence a certain prioritisation between referrals was done.

Data collection:

Enrolled patients received one US examination by the study surgeon as well as the standard US examination by the on-duty radiologist. In a majority of cases the two examinations were performed consecutively and the time interval between the surgeon-performed US and radiologist-performed US never exceeded 24 hours. The surgeon's examination took place either before or right after the radiologist's examination. The examining surgeon and radiologist were blinded to each other's findings. The surgeon's US examination followed a standardised protocol, which included a full abdominal scan, regardless of the nature of the referral. The presence of gallstones was marked as a 'yes' (positive finding, regardless of number or size) or 'no' (negative finding) by the surgeon. In cases where a full abdominal scan could not be performed, due to urgent patient management, a focused examination based on the referral as well as a right upper quadrant (RUQ) scan was advised. The on-duty radiologist performed a standard care US focusing on the individual referrals. The radiologist's statement was collected from the patient's medical record and transferred to the study protocol by a separate radiologist, who was also blinded to the surgeon's examination. Among the radiologists the major part of the scans was done by US specialised radiologists with several years of training (56% US specialists, 73% specialists in radiology).

The surgeons used a portable US machine of the model LOGIQ e with a convex (1.6-4.6 MHz) or linear (5-13 MHz) transducer, GE Healthcare, WuXi, China. All scans were saved on a separate hard drive, which was kept together with the study protocol. The radiologists used Philips iU22 with a convex C5-1 or a linear L12-5 transducer.

US training of surgeons participating in the study:

Six study surgeons, five in the final years of their specialist training and one specialist in surgery, with limited or no previous US training, attended a one-week course, comprising US physics, technique, anatomy and hands-on training, led by specialists in US. After attending the course the surgeons received three weeks of training in the radiology department under the guidance of an US specialist. The surgeons were expected to perform a minimum of 50 supervised scans, which was obtained in all cases but one. The training focused on detecting gallbladder stones, widened bile ducts, thickened wall of the gallbladder, lesions in the liver parenchyma, hydronephrosis, abdominal aortic aneurysms, free abdominal fluid and appendicitis. After the training was completed, each surgeon spent a minimum of two weeks enrolling and scanning patients during office hours in the hospital's radiology department.

Ethics:

The patients received oral and written information from the study surgeon and were included after informed consent. The study was approved by the Ethical Review Board, at Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Gallstones

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ultrasound

surgeon-performed ultrasound

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients referred to the radiology department for an abdominal ultrasound
* Age \> 18 years

Exclusion Criteria

* Inability to communicate with the examiner
* Referral for intervention
* Metastasis screening
* Referrals concerning contrast enhanced examinations
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Karolinska Institutet

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Camilla Gustafsson

PhD student

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Anders Sonden, MD. PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Karolinska Institutet Södersjukhuset

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Karolinska Institutet Södersjukhuset (South General Hospital)

Stockholm, Stockholm County, Sweden

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Sweden

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Powers RD, Guertler AT. Abdominal pain in the ED: stability and change over 20 years. Am J Emerg Med. 1995 May;13(3):301-3. doi: 10.1016/0735-6757(95)90204-X.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 7755822 (View on PubMed)

Cooperberg PL, Burhenne HJ. Real-time ultrasonography. Diagnostic technique of choice in calculous gallbladder disease. N Engl J Med. 1980 Jun 5;302(23):1277-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198006053022303.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 7366693 (View on PubMed)

Kell MR, Aherne NJ, Coffey C, Power CP, Kirwan WO, Redmond HP. Emergency surgeon-performed hepatobiliary ultrasonography. Br J Surg. 2002 Nov;89(11):1402-4. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02297.x.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 12390381 (View on PubMed)

Rozycki GS. Surgeon-performed ultrasound: its use in clinical practice. Ann Surg. 1998 Jul;228(1):16-28. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199807000-00004.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 9671062 (View on PubMed)

Moore CL, Copel JA. Point-of-care ultrasonography. N Engl J Med. 2011 Feb 24;364(8):749-57. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0909487. No abstract available.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21345104 (View on PubMed)

Allemann F, Cassina P, Rothlin M, Largiader F. Ultrasound scans done by surgeons for patients with acute abdominal pain: a prospective study. Eur J Surg. 1999 Oct;165(10):966-70. doi: 10.1080/110241599750008099.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 10574106 (View on PubMed)

Lindelius A, Torngren S, Pettersson H, Adami J. Role of surgeon-performed ultrasound on further management of patients with acute abdominal pain: a randomised controlled clinical trial. Emerg Med J. 2009 Aug;26(8):561-6. doi: 10.1136/emj.2008.062067.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 19625549 (View on PubMed)

Fang R, Pilcher JA, Putnam AT, Smith T, Smith DL. Accuracy of surgeon-performed gallbladder ultrasound. Am J Surg. 1999 Dec;178(6):475-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(99)00225-1.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 10670856 (View on PubMed)

Ahmad S, Zafar A, Ahmad M, Ghafoor A, Malik E, Ali A, Qazi UA. Accuracy of surgeon-performed abdominal utrasound for gallstones. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2005 Jan-Mar;17(1):70-1.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 15929534 (View on PubMed)

Shea JA, Berlin JA, Escarce JJ, Clarke JR, Kinosian BP, Cabana MD, Tsai WW, Horangic N, Malet PF, Schwartz JS, et al. Revised estimates of diagnostic test sensitivity and specificity in suspected biliary tract disease. Arch Intern Med. 1994 Nov 28;154(22):2573-81.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 7979854 (View on PubMed)

Carroll PJ, Gibson D, El-Faedy O, Dunne C, Coffey C, Hannigan A, Walsh SR. Surgeon-performed ultrasound at the bedside for the detection of appendicitis and gallstones: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg. 2013 Jan;205(1):102-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.02.017. Epub 2012 Jun 29.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 22748292 (View on PubMed)

Lindelius A, Torngren S, Sonden A, Pettersson H, Adami J. Impact of surgeon-performed ultrasound on diagnosis of abdominal pain. Emerg Med J. 2008 Aug;25(8):486-91. doi: 10.1136/emj.2007.052142.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 18660395 (View on PubMed)

Newcombe RG. Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods. Stat Med. 1998 Apr 30;17(8):857-72. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19980430)17:83.0.co;2-e.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 9595616 (View on PubMed)

Irkorucu O, Reyhan E, Erdem H, Cetinkunar S, Deger KC, Yilmaz C. Accuracy of surgeon-performed gallbladder ultrasound in identification of acute cholecystitis. J Invest Surg. 2013 Apr;26(2):85-8. doi: 10.3109/08941939.2012.697977. Epub 2012 Dec 28.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 23273179 (View on PubMed)

Scruggs W, Fox JC, Potts B, Zlidenny A, McDonough J, Anderson CL, Larson J, Barajas G, Langdorf MI. Accuracy of ED Bedside Ultrasound for Identification of gallstones: retrospective analysis of 575 studies. West J Emerg Med. 2008 Jan;9(1):1-5.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 19561694 (View on PubMed)

Shepherd AE, Gogalniceanu P, Kashef E, Purkayastha S, Zacharakis E, Paraskeva PA. Surgeon-performed ultrasound--a call for consensus and standardization. J Surg Educ. 2012 Jan-Feb;69(1):132-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2011.09.006. Epub 2011 Nov 3. No abstract available.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 22208845 (View on PubMed)

Gaspari RJ, Dickman E, Blehar D. Learning curve of bedside ultrasound of the gallbladder. J Emerg Med. 2009 Jul;37(1):51-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2007.10.070. Epub 2008 Apr 25.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 18439787 (View on PubMed)

Gustafsson C, Lindelius A, Torngren S, Jarnbert-Pettersson H, Sonden A. Surgeon-Performed Ultrasound in Diagnosing Acute Cholecystitis and Appendicitis. World J Surg. 2018 Nov;42(11):3551-3559. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4673-z.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29882098 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://OpenEpi.com

Statistical procedures

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2011/1025-31/1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Bile Aspiration vs Drain in Acute Cholecystitis
NCT03012243 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA
Cholecystectomy During Weekends
NCT06559449 COMPLETED