Economic Impact of mNGS on Diagnosis of Post-neurosurgical Central Nervous System Infection

NCT ID: NCT05887037

Last Updated: 2023-10-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

204 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-07-01

Study Completion Date

2025-07-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of the current study was to assess the economic impact of using metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) versus traditional bacterial culture directed CNSIs diagnosis and therapy in post-neurosurgical patients from Beijing Tiantan Hospital. mNGS is a relatively expensive test item, and whether it has the corresponding health economic significance in the clinical application of diagnosing intracranial infection has not been studied clearly. Therefore, the investigators hope to explore the clinical application value of mNGS detection in central nervous system infection after neurosurgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Central nervous system infections (CNSIs) are severe complications after neurosurgery, that can lead to a poor prognosis. The incidence of postoperative central nervous system infections (PCNSIs) ranges from 2.8% to 14%, and there are differences between different regions. The incidence rate in developed countries is lower than that in developing countries. The most common manifestations of PCNSIs include meningitis, ventriculitis, subdural abscess, epidural abscesses, and brain abscesses. Studies have shown that the most common pathogens of PCNSIs are Staphylococcus aureus, and coagulase-negative staphylococcus, followed by gram-negative bacteria. In China, the pathogen detection rate of traditional cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) culture can only reach 5.4-10%. In addition, culture as the gold standard is time-consuming and susceptible to the use of antibiotics. PCNSIs is related to increased treatment costs, prolonged hospitalization time, psychological trauma and delayed postoperative adjuvant treatment, which places a substantial economic and psychological burden on society and patients' families.

Given the seriousness of PCNSIs, it is challenging to choose the appropriate antibiotic treatment for PCNSIs and should be guided by pathogens and their drug sensitivity. Thus, early and efficient diagnosis of pathogens is crucial for PCNSIs. Compared with traditional pathogenic microbial detection methods, metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) has faster, more accurate, and more complete advantages. Currently, it is widely used in CNSIs, respiratory infections, blood infections, etc., especially suitable for the diagnosis of acute, critical, and complicated infections. Studies have shown that the positive rate of mNGS is much higher than that of culture, and it is less affected by the use of antibiotics, which can provide more accurate feedback on the patient's infection status. At the same time, it can detect a variety of pathogen types, providing more effective guidance for treatment. In addition, the fast detection speed of mNGS can effectively shorten the patient's course of the disease and significantly improve the prognosis of infected patients.

Most published mNGS studies are evaluations of their clinical diagnostic value. However, there is still some controversy over the full clinical use of mNGS, and one of the main reasons is cost constraints. The overall cost of mNGS detection reagents and labor in each sample is much higher than that of traditional detection methods. There are still no reports on health economics research on the use of mNGS to diagnose CNSIs after neurosurgery. Therefore, prospective clinical trials are needed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of mNGS, a relatively expensive new detection method.

In summary, this study intends to conduct a health economics study of mNGS to diagnose postoperative central nervous system infections and evaluate whether mNGS, as a relatively expensive new technology, can identify the pathogen at the early stage, shorten the time of anti-infective treatment, reduce the overall medical cost, and improve the cure rate of patients. In addition, this study provides theoretical guidance for clinical and public health departments to make cost-effective decisions more scientifically, make more effective use of medical resources, and improve the social and economic benefits of etiological diagnosis.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Central Nervous System Infections

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Experimental group

The experimental group was sent for CSF mNGS and traditional microbiological cultures at the same time, and the mNGS results were usually earlier than the traditional microbiological cultures results. The experimental group adjusted or continued the current medication regimen according to the mNGS reporting pathogen and the expert team's opinion. Subsequently, if the CSF traditional microbiological cultures results in the experimental group are consistent with the mNGS results, the current treatment plan of the patient is continued, and if the results are inconsistent with the mNGS results, the expert team needs to discuss and adjust the treatment plan. When no causative organism is detected in mNGS, empiric treatment is continued, and treatment is adjusted pending the pathogen culture results.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

mNGS

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

mNGS is the direct extraction of nucleic acid from clinical samples. High-throughput sequencing technology and bioinformatics analysis were adopted to complete the detection of pathogens such as bacteria, fungi, viruses and parasites at one time

The traditional microbiological cultures

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Traditional microbial culture is the gold standard for the diagnosis of central nervous system infection, but the traditional microbiological culture time is long and the detection rate is low.

Control group

After a clinical diagnosis of central nervous system infection, the control group was treated empirically based on only cerebrospinal fluid for traditional microbiological cultures, without mNGS detection, and the treatment plan was adjusted according to the traditional microbiological cultures results. If the patient's culture is negative and empiric therapy does not improve, cerebrospinal fluid is retained for mNGS testing. Treatment is adjusted based on mNGS results and expert team evaluation.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

The traditional microbiological cultures

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Traditional microbial culture is the gold standard for the diagnosis of central nervous system infection, but the traditional microbiological culture time is long and the detection rate is low.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

mNGS

mNGS is the direct extraction of nucleic acid from clinical samples. High-throughput sequencing technology and bioinformatics analysis were adopted to complete the detection of pathogens such as bacteria, fungi, viruses and parasites at one time

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

The traditional microbiological cultures

Traditional microbial culture is the gold standard for the diagnosis of central nervous system infection, but the traditional microbiological culture time is long and the detection rate is low.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

·Central nervous system infections

Exclusion Criteria

* Unqualified samples
* Patients and their families refused to sign the informed consent
* The clinician considered the case unsuitable for inclusion in the study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Jian-Xin Zhou

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jian-Xin Zhou

Professor

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Linlin Zhang

Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Jian-Xin Zhou, MD

Role: CONTACT

8610 63926888

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Linlin Zhang

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

KY2023-018-02

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.