Aloe Vera Versus Thyme Honey Mouthwash in Management of Xerostomia in Type 2 Diabetics
NCT ID: NCT05885906
Last Updated: 2023-09-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE3
45 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-07-24
2024-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
1. Compare the clinical efficacy of (50%) aloe vera versus (20%) thyme honey mouthwash on management of xerostomia in diabetic patients by measuring the salivary flow rate as a primary objective.
2. Asses the biochemical effect of aloe vera and thyme honey on the level of salivary nitric oxide, xerostomia grade as well as patient quality of life as a secondary objective.
Research question:
Which is better aloe vera or thyme honey in improving salivary flow rate in diabetic patients suffering from xerostomia?
Patient Grouping and Randomization:
Patients with xerostomia will be randomly distributed into three groups using a computer-generated randomization table. Allocation concealment will be achieved by a sealed opaque envelope with a ratio of 1:1:1
Group 1 (Aloe Vera group)
Include (15) patient suffering from diabetes induced xerostomia that will receive aloe vera as mouthwash
Group 2 (Thyme honey group):
Include (15) patient suffering from diabetes induced xerostomia that will receive thyme honey mouthwash
Group 3 (Saline control group):
Include (15) patient suffering from diabetes induced xerostomia that will receive saline mouthwash
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Efficacy of Thyme Honey Mouth Rinse on Polypharmacy-induced Xerostomia
NCT06201923
Effectiveness of Thyme Honey in Management of Xerostomia in Post Radiation Cancer Patients
NCT05859711
Effect of Aloe Vera Gel and Manuka Honey on Radiation Induced Oral Mucositis
NCT06381635
Efficacy of Manuka Honey Oral Rinse in Treatment of Xerostomia
NCT06240806
The Efficacy of Hibiscus Sabdariffa in Xerostomia
NCT06413550
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Aloevera group
15 patients suffering from diabetes induced xerostomia that will receive aloe vera as mouthwash (20 ml of aloe vera 50%) 3 times per day for 4 weeks.
Aloevera
Mouthwash
Thyme honey group
15 patients suffering from diabetes induced xerostomia that will receive thyme honey mouthwash (20 ml of thyme honey diluted in 100 ml of distilled water) 3 times per day for 4 weeks.
Thyme honey
Mouthwash
Saline group
15 patients suffering from diabetes induced xerostomia that will receive saline mouthwash as a control group (20 ml of saline) 3 times per day for 4 weeks.
Saline
Mouthwash
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Aloevera
Mouthwash
Thyme honey
Mouthwash
Saline
Mouthwash
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patients willing to follow all the instructions and attend all the study-associated visits.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patients with other systemic diseases known to cause xerostomia (Sjogren's syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, hepatitis C virus, tuberculosis, or sarcoidosis).
3. Patients using any other medication for their dry mouth condition (pilocarpine, cevimeline) 7 days before entering into the study.
4. Patients requiring hospitalization for any medical problem during the study.
5. Known hypersensitivity to the active ingredient of the product that will be used as assessed by the medical history questionnaire.
6. Vulnerable groups such as mentally or physically handicapped individuals, pregnant females, prisoners.
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ain Shams University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Dina Borham Abdelhafez Abdellatif Elkhouly
Resident
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Radwa Rageb, PHD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Ain Shams University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Faculty of dentistry Ain shams university
Cairo, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
FDASU-RecIM122208
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.