Comparison of the Effectiveness of Three Different Gargates in Radiotherapy-Associated Oral Mucositis
NCT ID: NCT05648682
Last Updated: 2022-12-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
48 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-01-01
2022-01-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Saline
The patients in the group gargling with saline were given in a 500 ml bottle at each visit for one week of use. Patients were told that they should gargle using approximately two tablespoons of the solution given for each usage.
Salin
Patients were told that they should gargle using approximately 2 tablespoons of the solution given for each use. SF solution was obtained from the medical company as 500 ml separately for each patient.
Sodium Bicarbonate
The sodium bicarbonate solution prepared by the researcher by mixing one teaspoon of baking soda (4.5 grams) into 500 ml of distilled water by the researcher was given to the patients in the group gargling with sodium bicarbonate for a one-week use at each interview. Patients were told that they should gargle using approximately two tablespoons of the solution given for each usage.
Sodium bicarbonate
Patients were told that they should gargle using approximately two tablespoons of the solution given for each use. The 500 ml distilled water bottle to be used for the SB solution was obtained from the medical company, separately for each patient.
Thyme Honey
20 ml of honey was diluted in 100 ml distilled water bottles by the researcher to the patients in the group gargling with thyme honey. For a week's use, the patient was given five honey solutions in 100 ml bottles at one time at each visit. Patients were told that they should gargle using approximately two tablespoons of the solution given for each use.
Thyme honey
Patients were told that they should gargle using approximately 2 tablespoons of the solution given for each use.
Control
No solution was given to the patients in the control group by the researcher.
Control
The patients continued to use the antifungal solution containing the active ingredient nystatin, which was prescribed routinely in the clinical procedure, 3 times a day.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Salin
Patients were told that they should gargle using approximately 2 tablespoons of the solution given for each use. SF solution was obtained from the medical company as 500 ml separately for each patient.
Sodium bicarbonate
Patients were told that they should gargle using approximately two tablespoons of the solution given for each use. The 500 ml distilled water bottle to be used for the SB solution was obtained from the medical company, separately for each patient.
Thyme honey
Patients were told that they should gargle using approximately 2 tablespoons of the solution given for each use.
Control
The patients continued to use the antifungal solution containing the active ingredient nystatin, which was prescribed routinely in the clinical procedure, 3 times a day.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* To be receiving radiotherapy at a dose of 50-60 Gy in the oral cavity
* Not be metastatic
* OM grade 1 (according to NCI-CTCAE v4.03)
* Be 18 years or older
* Volunteer to participate in the study
* Speak Turkish
Exclusion Criteria
* Have dental disease
* Using dentures
* Being allergic to thyme honey
* Refusing to participate in the research
* To have received radiotherapy treatment in the 6-month period before the start of the study
Criteria for terminating the study
* The patient's desire to leave the study
* Continuing the treatment in another city
* Interruption or termination of radiotherapy treatment
* Patient's death
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi Gulhane Tip Fakultesi
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Zeynep Yilmaz
Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Fatma İlknur ÇINAR
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi
Zeynep YILMAZ
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Zeynep YILMAZ
Bilecik, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SBU_RKC
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id