Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-09-01
2025-01-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Treatment Of Bronchiolitis With Heated Humidified High Flow Nasal Cannula - Prospective And Retrospective Research
NCT02366715
High-flow Nasal Oxygen Therapy in Hospitalized Infant With Moderate-to-severe Bronchiolitis
NCT02856165
Assessment of Airway Obstruction in Infants With Lower Respiratory Infections
NCT00435994
High Flow Nasal Cannula in Children With Status Asthmaticus
NCT03157102
High Flow Nasal Cannula Rates in Pediatric Asthma
NCT06379607
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Hypothesis: In-line vibrating mesh nebulizer delivery via HFNC systems is a safe, feasible and efficacious approach in comparison to traditional jet nebulizer delivered nebulization in hypoxemic respiratory failure patients whose usual care includes nebulized drugs.
Specific Aims:
1. To evaluate the safety and feasibility of administering vibrating mesh nebulizer-delivered therapy in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure requiring high flow nasal cannula.
2. To evaluate the effect of trans-nasal nebulization on patient comfort and satisfaction with therapy in comparison with standard jet nebulization.
3. To evaluate differences in resource utilization between patients receiving standard jet nebulization and ILAN with HF, including time spent at the bedside by the respiratory therapist (RT) for delivery of the medication and any additional time gathering setting up and cleaning.
4. To evaluate patient and therapist perceptions and preference on the various delivery methods of aerosol delivery.
Study Design: ILAN is a double-crossover, multi-center trial evaluating the safety and feasibility of in line nebulized medication with high flow nasal canula in comparison to standard jet nebulizer therapy in acute respiratory failure requiring the utilization of high flow nasal cannula.
Intervention: Enrolled patients will receive two standard forms of inhaled medications as ordered by the physician. Patients will be randomized into two paths of the cross over study. There will be no blinding involved in this randomization. Path A will have medications delivered trans-nasally in line via the vibrating mesh nebulizer (VMN) with the high flow nasal cannula followed by standard jet nebulization (SJN) with face mask at the next time of medication dosing 3-6 hours later. Path B will receive standard jet nebulization without HFNC followed by the trans-nasal in line nebulization via the HFNC. Patients selected to enroll in day 2 of the trial will have their clinical path alternated in attempt to control for diurnal variability. All patients will also receive as-needed nebulized treatments as well as usual supportive care provided by respiratory therapists. As needed therapy will be delivered via the method of the current arm of the study they are in, and the washout period will subsequently reset.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Path A (vibrating mesh nebulizer (VMN) with the high flow nasal cannula)
Enrolled patients will receive two standard forms of inhaled medications as ordered by the physician. Patients will be randomized into two paths of the cross over study. There will be no blinding involved in this randomization. Path A will have medications delivered trans-nasally in line via the vibrating mesh nebulizer (VMN) with the high flow nasal cannula followed by standard jet nebulization (SJN) with face mask at the next time of medication dosing 3-6 hours later.
nebulizer via in-line drug delivery maintaining high-flow nasal cannula oxygen
nebulized delivery of bronchodilator via in-line drug delivery maintaining high-flow nasal cannula oxygen
standard jet nebulization (SJN) with face mask
standard jet nebulization delivery of bronchodilator
Path B (standard jet nebulization (SJN) with face mask)
Path B will receive standard jet nebulization without HFNC followed by the trans-nasal in line nebulization via the HFNC. Patients agreed to enroll in day 2 of the trial will have their clinical path alternated in attempt to control for diurnal variability. All patients will also receive as-needed nebulized treatments as well as usual supportive care provided by respiratory therapists. As needed therapy will be delivered via the method of the current arm of the study they are in, and the washout period will subsequently reset.
nebulizer via in-line drug delivery maintaining high-flow nasal cannula oxygen
nebulized delivery of bronchodilator via in-line drug delivery maintaining high-flow nasal cannula oxygen
standard jet nebulization (SJN) with face mask
standard jet nebulization delivery of bronchodilator
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
nebulizer via in-line drug delivery maintaining high-flow nasal cannula oxygen
nebulized delivery of bronchodilator via in-line drug delivery maintaining high-flow nasal cannula oxygen
standard jet nebulization (SJN) with face mask
standard jet nebulization delivery of bronchodilator
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients with mild or moderate hypoxemic respiratory failure (with or without acute hypercapnic respiratory failure) treated with HFNC.
* Nebulizer therapy ordered by the primary team with at least one dose delivered prior to the enrollment into the study
* Patients must be on ordered nebulized albuterol, levalbuterol, ipratropium or ipratropium/albuterol combination with a maximum of Q3 or a minimum of Q6 hour frequencies.
* For Respiratory Therapists: They must be employees of SMICU or RRMC.
Exclusion Criteria
* Severe hypoxemia defined by PaO2/FiO2\<100 or SpO2\<92% on HFNC settings: ≥ FiO2 80% or higher and O2 flow 40L/min
* HFNC O2 delivery via tracheostomy
* COVID-19 positive status (within 3 weeks prior to the enrollment)
* Respiratory distress, defined by respiratory rate \> 24 breath per minute
* Hemodynamic instability defined by the use of two or more vasopressor medications
* Presence of nasal obstruction that may pose a risk for inadequate nebulizer delivery in the opinion of the investigator
* Pulmonary comorbidities that, in the opinion of the investigator or clinical team, can pose a risk to subject safety or interfere with the subject's ability to complete the study procedures.
* Moribund patient not expected to survive \>24 hours
* Inability to obtain informed consent from patient
* Respiratory therapists who are unwilling to participate.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Aerogen
INDUSTRY
University of California, Los Angeles
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Igor Barjaktarevic, MD, PhD
Associate Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Igor Barjaktarevic, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of California, Los Angeles
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ronald Reagan Medical Center at UCLA
Los Angeles, California, United States
Santa Monica UCLA
Santa Monica, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
1. Rochwerg, B. Intensive Care Med, 2020 2. Li, J. Respir Care, 2021 3. Reminiac, F. Ann Intensive Care, 2018 4. Li, J. Crit Care, 2020. 5. Dugernier, J., J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv, 2019 6. Leung, C.C.H. J Hosp Infect, 2019 7. Reminiac, F., J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv, 2016 8. Berlinski, A. Respir Care, 2013 9. Ari, A., J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv, 2015 10. Ari, A., Respir Care, 2010 11. Alcoforado, L., Pharmaceutics, 2019 12. Bennett, G., Intensive Care Med Exp, 2019 13. Dugernier, J.,J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv, 2017 14. Zielinski, J., Chest, 1995 15. Ringbaek, T. and K. Viskum, Respir Med, 2003 16. Rezaie, N. J Res Med Sci, 2013 17. Rennard, S.I., Chest, 1996 18. Ogale, S.S., Chest, 2010 19. Drake, M.G., Ann Am Thorac Soc, 2018 20. Valencia-Ramos, J., Respir Care, 2018
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
21-001966
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.