Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate and Entcavir in Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B Patients in Upper Egypt
NCT ID: NCT05874440
Last Updated: 2023-05-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
100 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2023-04-15
2024-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of the Combined Single Dose of Dactavira Plus Or Dactavira in Egyptian Adults With Chronic Genotype 4 HCV Infection
NCT03186313
Prevalence and Risk Factors of Antiviral Resistance in Egyptian HBV Patients
NCT07274345
Study to Compare Tenofovir Alafenamide (TAF) Versus Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate (TDF) in Participants With Chronic Hepatitis B Infection Who Are Positive for Hepatitis B e Antigen
NCT01940471
Three Types of Nucleotide/Nucleoside Analogues Therapy in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis b
NCT04195074
A Study of Switching From Entecavir to Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate in Subjects With Chronic Hepatitis B
NCT03258710
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The symptoms of CHB include fatigue, nausea, abdominal distension, and Rt hypochondrial pain, and in severe cases, it can be accompanied by chronic liver disease, spider nevus, abnormal liver function, or persistent abnormality. The progression of hepatitis B virus (HBV) is closely linked to its replication, and the most effective way to prevent it is through hepatitis B vaccination. However, there is currently no specific drug available to eliminate the virus in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) due to the low rate of HBsAg clearance. Instead, primary treatment methods for CHB aim to inhibit virus replication for an extended period and delay the onset of liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Antiviral, liver protection, antifibrosis, and immunomodulatory therapies are used to achieve this goal. Among these therapies, nucleoside (acid) analogs (NA) are commonly used, with drugs such as entecavir (ETV) and tenofovir (TDF) being the most effective. Tenofovir is a new type of nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor, which inhibits reverse transcriptase similarly to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. To a certain extent, it can reduce transaminase, protect the liver, and has a good effect on the treatment of hepatitis B. ETV is a carboxylic analog of 2'-deoxyguanosine, which inhibits HBV DNA polymerase by competing with natural deoxy guanosine triphosphate.
The use of entecavir (ETV) and tenofovir disoproxil (TDF) are both effective in managing hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, and are well-tolerated by most patients.
While there are no significant differences in the ability of the various treatments to suppress the virus, some studies suggest that TDF may achieve biochemical response more quickly. Nucleoside analogs with a high barrier to resistance are unlikely to lead to the clearance of hepatitis B surface antigen, and should therefore be continued for most patients throughout their lifetime. However, there are concerns about the potential for toxicity with TDF in patients who have additional risk factors for kidney and bone problems. It is important to monitor for adverse effects, and switching to ETV may be a safe and effective alternative for patients with HBV. Although effective antiviral treatment can improve the clinical outcome of chronic HBV patients, there is still a risk of developing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) even with viral suppression. It is unclear whether TDF-based regimens offer any additional benefits over ETV in preventing HCC, and more research is needed in this area. Studies conducted on both TDF and ETV have demonstrated their safety in both pivotal trials and real-life cohorts. In less than 10% of cases, mild side effects such as headache, fatigue, dizziness, nausea, abdominal discomfort, and nasopharyngitis have been reported for both drugs. These side effects are generally temporary and not severe enough to require discontinuation of treatment. However, TDF has been associated with kidney dysfunction, particularly in patients with pre-existing kidney disease or other risk factors for renal impairment. Furthermore, TDF has been linked to bone disease. As a result, the European Association for the Study of the Liver recommends selecting or switching to ETV for patients with chronic hepatitis B who are at greater risk of bone and kidney toxicity.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate and Entcavir
Regular registration of side effects of the drugs, cause of non-compliance to treatment
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients have HbeAg positive or negative.
* Patient recived Theryapy with ETV 0.5 or 1 mg/day or TDF 300 mg/day.
* Patients have Regular monitoring every 6 months.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients co-infected with hepatitis C, hepatitis D.
* Patients receiving immune suppressive therapy or with history of immunodeficiency
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sohag University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Rehab Abdelraof Mohamed
Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate and Entcavir in Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B patients in Upper Egypt
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Sohag University hospitals
Sohag, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Choi J, Jo C, Lim YS. Tenofovir Versus Entecavir on Recurrence of Hepatitis B Virus-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Surgical Resection. Hepatology. 2021 Feb;73(2):661-673. doi: 10.1002/hep.31289. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
Langley DR, Walsh AW, Baldick CJ, Eggers BJ, Rose RE, Levine SM, Kapur AJ, Colonno RJ, Tenney DJ. Inhibition of hepatitis B virus polymerase by entecavir. J Virol. 2007 Apr;81(8):3992-4001. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02395-06. Epub 2007 Jan 31.
Lim YS. Management of Antiviral Resistance in Chronic Hepatitis B. Gut Liver. 2017 Mar 15;11(2):189-195. doi: 10.5009/gnl15562.
Shi YW, Yang RX, Fan JG. Chronic hepatitis B infection with concomitant hepatic steatosis: Current evidence and opinion. World J Gastroenterol. 2021 Jul 14;27(26):3971-3983. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i26.3971.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Soh-Med-23-04-05MD
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.