Study to Compare Tenofovir Alafenamide (TAF) Versus Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate (TDF) in Participants With Chronic Hepatitis B Infection Who Are Negative for Hepatitis B e Antigen
NCT ID: NCT01940341
Last Updated: 2023-09-25
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
426 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-09-12
2022-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Study to Compare Tenofovir Alafenamide (TAF) Versus Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate (TDF) in Participants With Chronic Hepatitis B Infection Who Are Positive for Hepatitis B e Antigen
NCT01940471
Tenofovir Alafenamide Versus Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate for Treatment of Hepatitis B e Antigen-Positive Hepatitis B (China)
NCT02836249
Tenofovir Alafenamide Versus Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate for Treatment of Hepatitis B e Antigen-Negative Hepatitis B (China)
NCT02836236
Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Switching From TDF to TAF in Adults With Chronic Hepatitis B Who Are Virologically Suppressed
NCT02979613
Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Switching to Tenofovir Alafenamide (TAF) From Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate (TDF) and/or Other Oral Antiviral Treatment (OAV)
NCT03180619
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
TAF 25 mg
TAF + TDF placebo for 96 weeks (per amendment 1 \& 2) or 144 weeks (per amendment 3).
TAF
25 mg tablet administered orally once daily
TDF Placebo
Tablet administered orally once daily
TDF 300 mg
TDF + TAF placebo for 96 weeks (per amendment 1 \& 2) or 144 weeks (per amendment 3).
TDF
300 mg tablet administered orally once daily
TAF Placebo
Tablet administered orally once daily
Open-label TAF
All participants who complete the double-blind period (96 weeks or 144 weeks) will be eligible to receive open-label TAF until Week 384 of the study.
After the end of study treatment, participants can either switch to commercially available anti-HBV treatments in their country or will be followed every 4 weeks, for up to 24 weeks off treatment (treatment-free follow-up (TFFU)) for safety assessment.
TAF
25 mg tablet administered orally once daily
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
TAF
25 mg tablet administered orally once daily
TDF
300 mg tablet administered orally once daily
TAF Placebo
Tablet administered orally once daily
TDF Placebo
Tablet administered orally once daily
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Adult males and non-pregnant, non-lactating females.
* Documented evidence of chronic HBV infection.
* Hepatitis e antigen (HBeAg)-negative, chronic hepatitis B with all of the following:
* HBeAg-negative and hepatitis B e antibody (HBeAb) positive at screening.
* Screening HBV DNA ≥ 2 x 10\^4 IU/mL.
* Screening serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level \> 60 U/L (males) or \> 38 U/L (females) and ≤ 10 x the upper limit of the normal range (ULN).
* Treatment-naive participants (defined as \< 12 weeks of oral antiviral treatment with any nucleoside or nucleotide analogue), OR treatment-experienced participants (defined as participants meeting all entry criteria \[including HBV DNA and serum ALT criteria\] and with ≥ 12 weeks of previous treatment with any nucleoside or nucleotide analogue).
* Previous treatment with interferon (pegylated or non pegylated) must have ended at least 6 months prior to Baseline.
* Adequate renal function.
* Normal electrocardiogram (ECG).
Exclusion Criteria
* Males and females of reproductive potential who are unwilling to use an "effective", protocol-specified method(s) of contraception during the study.
* Co-infection with hepatitis C virus, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), or hepatitis D virus.
* Evidence of hepatocellular carcinoma.
* Any history of, or current evidence of, clinical hepatic decompensation.
* Abnormal hematological and biochemical parameters, including aspartate aminotransferase (AST) \> 10 x ULN
* Received solid organ or bone marrow transplant.
* History of malignancy within the past 5 years, with the exception of specific cancers that are cured by surgical resection; individuals under evaluation for possible malignancy are not eligible.
* Currently receiving therapy with immunomodulators (eg, corticosteroids), investigational agents, nephrotoxic agents, or agents capable of modifying renal excretion.
* Individuals receiving ongoing therapy with drugs not to be used with tenofovir alafenamide or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate or individuals with a known hypersensitivity to study drugs, metabolites, or formulation excipients.
* Current alcohol or substance abuse judged by the investigator to potentially interfere with participant compliance.
* Any other clinical condition or prior therapy that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would make the participant unsuitable for the study or unable to comply with dosing requirements.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Gilead Sciences
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Gilead Study Director
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Gilead Sciences
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Asian Pacific Liver Center
Los Angeles, California, United States
Stanford University Medical Center
Palo Alto, California, United States
Huntington Medical Research Institutes
Pasadena, California, United States
Research and Education, Inc.
San Diego, California, United States
University California San Francisco (UCSF)
San Francisco, California, United States
Silicon Valley Research Institute
San Jose, California, United States
University of Miami
Miami, Florida, United States
Digestive Disease Associates, PA
Catonsville, Maryland, United States
Henry Ford Health System
Detroit, Michigan, United States
ID Care
Hillsborough, New Jersey, United States
Sing Chan Private Practice
Flushing, New York, United States
New Discovery, LLC
Flushing, New York, United States
Xiaoli Ma, PC
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Hunter Holmes McGuire VA DVMC
Richmond, Virginia, United States
Monash Medical Centre
Clayton, Victoria, Australia
St. Vincent's Hospital
Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia
Royal Melbourne Hospital
Parkville, Victoria, Australia
Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital
Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
Royal Perth Hospital
Perth, Western Australia, Australia
University of Calgary
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Zeidler Ledcor Centre Division of Gastroenterology
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Liver and Intestinal Research Centre
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Gordon and Leslie Diamond Health Care Centre
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Dr. John Farley Inc.
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Vancouver Infectious Disease Research and Care Centre
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Gastrointestinal Research Institute (GIRI)
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
University of Manitoba
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Toronto General Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Inspiration Research Limited
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Toronto Liver Centre
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Hôpital de la Croix Rousse
Lyon, , France
Hopital Civil de Strasbourg- CHU Service
Strasbourg, , France
Queen Mary Hospital
Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, Hong Kong
Princess Margaret Hospital
Kwai Chung, , Hong Kong
Prince of Wales Hospital
Shatin, , Hong Kong
Alice Ho Miu Ling Nethersole Hospital
Tai Po, , Hong Kong
Global Hospitals
Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India
Centre for Liver Research & Diagnostic, Deccan College of Medical Sciences and Allied Hospitals
Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India
Nirmal Hospital
Surat, Gujarat, India
Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital
Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
Global Hospital Super Specialty & Transplant Centre
Pārel, Mumbai, India
All India Institute of Medical Sciences
New Delhi, National Capital Territory of Delhi, India
S. R Kalla Memorial Gastro & General Hospital
Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education And Research
Kolkata, West Bengal, India
Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research
Chandigarh, , India
Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences
New Delhi, , India
IRCCS Ospedale Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza
San Giovanni Rotondo, Foggia, Italy
Azienda Ospedaliera S. Orsola - Malpighi
Bologna, , Italy
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Ospedali
Foggia, , Italy
Azienda Ospedaliero- Universitaria Pisana
Pisa, , Italy
Kurume University Hospital
Kurume-shi, Fukuoka, Japan
Kyushu University Hospital Fukuoka
Fukuoka, Fukuoka-shi, Japan
National Hospital Organization Nagasaki Medical Center
Omura-shi, Nagasaki, Japan
Osaka University Hospital
Suita, Osaka, Japan
Shin-Kokura Hospital
Kitakyushu, , Japan
Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital
Kobe, , Japan
Japan Red Cross Musashino Hospital
Musashino, , Japan
The Hospital of Hyogo College of Medicine
Nishinomiya, , Japan
Osaka Red Cross Hospital
Osaka, , Japan
Hokkaido University Hospital
Sapporo, , Japan
Medical Hospital of Tokyo Medical and Dental University
Tokyo, , Japan
Auckland Clinical Studies Limited
Auckland, , New Zealand
Uniwersytecki Szpital Kliniczny w Bialymstoku Klinika
Bialystok, , Poland
Szpital Specjalistyczny w Chorzowie Oddział
Chorzów, , Poland
SPZOZ, Wojewódzki Specjalistyczny Szpital
Lodz, , Poland
Centrum Badan Klinicznych - Przychodnia Badan
Wroclaw, , Poland
Institutul National de Boli Infectioase "Prof. Dr. Matei Bals"
Bucharest, București, Romania
Centrul Medical de Diagnostic si Tratament "Dr. Victor Babes"
Bucharest, , Romania
Institutul National de Boli Infectioase Prof.Dr. Matei Bals
Bucharest, , Romania
Spitatul Clinic de Boli Infectioase Constanta
Constanța, , Romania
Gastromedica SRL
Iași, , Romania
Infection Center LLC Building 20, MSH #163 Territory Koltsovo
Kol'tsovo, Novosibirsk Oblast, Russia
1st Moscow State Medical University University Clinical Hospital #3
Moscow, , Russia
Limited Liability Company "Modern Medicine Clinic"
Moscow, , Russia
Infectious Clinical Hospital #1 of Moscow Healthcare Department
Moscow, , Russia
Novosibirsk State Medical University
Novosibirsk, , Russia
State Novosibirsk Regional Clinical Hospital
Novosibirsk, , Russia
Scientific Research Institute of Clinical Immunology
Novosibirsk, , Russia
Clinical Infectious Hospital named after S.P.Botkin
Saint Petersburg, , Russia
Kirov Medical Military Academy
Saint Petersburg, , Russia
Research Institute of Influenza
Saint Petersburg, , Russia
Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital
Yangsan, Gyeongsangnam-do, South Korea
Kyungpook National University Hospital
Daegu, , South Korea
Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center
Daegu, , South Korea
Yonsei University, Severance Hospital
Seoul, , South Korea
Asan Medical Center
Seoul, , South Korea
Gangnam Severance Hospital
Seoul, , South Korea
Samsung Medical Center
Seoul, , South Korea
Seoul Saint Mary Hospital
Seoul, , South Korea
Chung-Ang University Hospital
Seoul, , South Korea
Korea University Guro Hospital
Seoul, , South Korea
Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron
Barcelona, , Spain
Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital
Hualien City, , Taiwan
Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital
Kaohsiung City, , Taiwan
Taichung Veterans General Hospital
Taichung, , Taiwan
National Cheng Kung University Hospital
Tainan City, , Taiwan
National Taiwan University Hospital
Taipei, , Taiwan
Dicle University Medical Faculty Department of Infectious Diseases
Diyarbakır, Diyarbakri, Turkey (Türkiye)
Ankara Üniversitesi Gastroenteroloji Bilim Dalı Cebeci
Ankara, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Uludag Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Gastroenteroloji
Bursa, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Istanbul Universitesi Cerrahpassa Tip Fakultesi Hastanesi
Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Ege Universitesi Tip Fakultesi Hastanesi
Izmir, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, United Kingdom
Barts and The London NHS Trust Royal London Hospital
London, , United Kingdom
King's College Hospital
London, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Buti M, Lim YS, Chan HLY, Agarwal K, Marcellin P, Brunetto MR, Chuang WL, Janssen HLA, Fung SK, Izumi N, Jablkowski MS, Abdurakhmanov D, Abramov F, Wang H, Botros I, Yee LJ, Mateo R, Flaherty JF, Osinusi A, Pan CQ, Shalimar X, Seto WK, Gane EJ. Eight-year efficacy and safety of tenofovir alafenamide for treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus infection: Final results from two randomised phase 3 trials. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2024 Dec;60(11-12):1573-1586. doi: 10.1111/apt.18278. Epub 2024 Sep 27.
Lim YS, Chan HLY, Ahn SH, Seto WK, Ning Q, Agarwal K, Janssen HLA, Pan CQ, Chuang WL, Izumi N, Fung S, Shalimar, Brunetto M, Hui AJ, Chang TT, Lim SG, Abramov F, Flaherty JF, Wang H, Yee LJ, Kao JH, Gane E, Hou J, Buti M. Tenofovir alafenamide and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate reduce incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic hepatitis B. JHEP Rep. 2023 Jul 13;5(10):100847. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2023.100847. eCollection 2023 Oct.
Chan HLY, Buti M, Lim YS, Agarwal K, Marcellin P, Brunetto M, Chuang WL, Janssen HLA, Fung S, Izumi N, Abdurakhmanov D, Jablkowski M, Celen MK, Ma X, Caruntu F, Flaherty JF, Abramov F, Wang H, Camus G, Osinusi A, Pan CQ, Shalimar, Seto WK, Gane E; GS-US-320-0110 and GS-US-320-0108 investigators. Long-Term Treatment With Tenofovir Alafenamide for Chronic Hepatitis B Results in High Rates of Viral Suppression and Favorable Renal and Bone Safety. Am J Gastroenterol. 2024 Mar 1;119(3):486-496. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002468. Epub 2023 Aug 9.
Cathcart AL, Chan HL, Bhardwaj N, Liu Y, Marcellin P, Pan CQ, Shalimar, Buti M, Cox S, Parhy B, Zhou E, Martin R, Chang S, Lin L, Flaherty JF, Kitrinos KM, Gaggar A, Izumi N, Lim YS. No Resistance to Tenofovir Alafenamide Detected through 96 Weeks of Treatment in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B Infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018 Sep 24;62(10):e01064-18. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01064-18. Print 2018 Oct.
Seto WK, Asahina Y, Brown TT, Peng CY, Stanciu C, Abdurakhmanov D, Tabak F, Nguyen TT, Chuang WL, Inokuma T, Ikeda F, Santantonio TA, Habersetzer F, Ramji A, Lau AH, Suri V, Flaherty JF, Wang H, Gaggar A, Subramanian GM, Mukewar S, Brunetto MR, Fung S, Chan HL. Improved Bone Safety of Tenofovir Alafenamide Compared to Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Over 2 Years in Patients With Chronic HBV Infection. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Jun 20:S1542-3565(18)30633-5. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.06.023. Online ahead of print.
Agarwal K, Brunetto M, Seto WK, Lim YS, Fung S, Marcellin P, Ahn SH, Izumi N, Chuang WL, Bae H, Sharma M, Janssen HLA, Pan CQ, Celen MK, Furusyo N, Shalimar D, Yoon KT, Trinh H, Flaherty JF, Gaggar A, Lau AH, Cathcart AL, Lin L, Bhardwaj N, Suri V, Mani Subramanian G, Gane EJ, Buti M, Chan HLY; GS-US-320-0110; GS-US-320-0108 Investigators. 96 weeks treatment of tenofovir alafenamide vs. tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for hepatitis B virus infection. J Hepatol. 2018 Apr;68(4):672-681. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.11.039. Epub 2018 Jan 17.
Buti M, Gane E, Seto WK, Chan HL, Chuang WL, Stepanova T, Hui AJ, Lim YS, Mehta R, Janssen HL, Acharya SK, Flaherty JF, Massetto B, Cathcart AL, Kim K, Gaggar A, Subramanian GM, McHutchison JG, Pan CQ, Brunetto M, Izumi N, Marcellin P; GS-US-320-0108 Investigators. Tenofovir alafenamide versus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for the treatment of patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B virus infection: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Nov;1(3):196-206. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(16)30107-8. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Gilead Clinical Trials Website
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2013-000626-63
Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
GS-US-320-0108
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.