Efficacy and Safety of Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate (TDF) 300mg in Chinese Subjects With Chronic Hepatitis B (CHB)

NCT ID: NCT01300234

Last Updated: 2018-07-13

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

512 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-03-30

Study Completion Date

2016-12-06

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a multi-centre, double blind, double dummy, randomised, controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TDF 300mg QD versus ADV 10mg QD in Chinese subjects with CHB. This study is designed to demonstrate the superiority of TDF 300mg QD over ADV 10mg QD in treating Chinese subjects with CHB (hepatitis B e antigen \[HBeAg\] positive subjects and HBeAg negative subjects). It will also provide long-term efficacy and safety data (up to 240 weeks) for TDF 300 mg administered once daily.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a multi-centre, double-blind, double-dummy, randomised, controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TDF 300mg QD versus ADV 10mg QD in Chinese subjects with CHB. Four hundred and ninety-four subjects with CHB (200 HBeAg positive subjects and 294 HBeAg negative subjects) will be randomised (1:1ratio) to either TDF 300mg QD or ADV 10mg QD treatment arms. The primary endpoint is the proportion of subjects with blood hepatitis B virus (HBV) deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) \<400copies/mL (Roche COBAS Taqman HBV test) at Week 48 in HBeAg positive subjects with CHB and HBeAg negative subjects with CHB. This is a two-part study. The first treatment period (baseline to Week 48) will investigate the effects of TDF and ADV on safety and efficacy endpoints; dosing will be double-blind. This period will be followed by 192 weeks in which all subjects will receive open-label TDF (Week 49 to Week 240). Subjects will undergo regular safety and efficacy assessments every 4 weeks for the first 12 weeks followed by every 12 weeks for a total of up to 5 years.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hepatitis B

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

A (TDF tablets)

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) tablets

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) tablets

Intervention Type DRUG

white, almond-shaped, film-coated tablets containing 300mg of TDF

B (ADV tablets)

Adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) tablets

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) tablets

Intervention Type DRUG

white to off-white, round, biconvex tablets containing 10mg of ADV

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) tablets

white, almond-shaped, film-coated tablets containing 300mg of TDF

Intervention Type DRUG

Adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) tablets

white to off-white, round, biconvex tablets containing 10mg of ADV

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

TDF tablet ADV tablet

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* HBeAg positive/negative CHB with blood HBVDNA≥10\^5 copies/mL and elevated ALT
* Nucleoside and nucleotide naïve CHB subjects. Previous lamivudine treatment is allowed in less than 10% of the total study population

Exclusion Criteria

* subjects with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) potential or decompensated liver disease
* subjects with acute liver disease due to other causes
* subjects with medication history of immunosuppressive therapy, immunomodulatory therapy, systemic cytotoxic agents, chronic antiviral agents including Chinese herbal medicines known to have activity against HBV (e.g., lamivudine, hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIg)) within the previous 6 months prior to randomisation into this study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

69 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

GlaxoSmithKline

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

GSK Clinical Trials

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

GlaxoSmithKline

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

GSK Investigational Site

Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Wuhan, Hubei, China

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Changsha, Hunan, China

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Nanjing, Jiangsu, China

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Nanjing, Jiangsu, China

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Changchun, Jilin, China

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Chengdu, Sichuan, China

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Beijing, , China

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Beijing, , China

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Beijing, , China

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Chongqing, , China

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Fuzhou, , China

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Jinan, , China

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Shanghai, , China

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Shanghai, , China

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Shanghai, , China

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Shanghai, , China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Liang X, Gao Z, Xie Q, Zhang J, Sheng J, Cheng J, Chen C, Mao Q, Zhao W, Ren H, Tan D, Niu J, Chen S, Pan C, Tang H, Wang H, Mao Y, Jia J, Ning Q, Xu M, Wu S, Li J, Zhang X, Zhang W, Xiong C, Hou J. Long-term efficacy and safety of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in Chinese patients with chronic hepatitis B: 5-year results. Hepatol Int. 2019 May;13(3):260-269. doi: 10.1007/s12072-019-09943-6. Epub 2019 Apr 11.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30977033 (View on PubMed)

Hou JL, Gao ZL, Xie Q, Zhang JM, Sheng JF, Cheng J, Chen CW, Mao Q, Zhao W, Ren H, Tan DM, Niu JQ, Chen SJ, Pan C, Tang H, Wang H, Mao YM, Jia JD, Ning Q, Xu M, Wu SM, Li J, Zhang XX, Ji Y, Dong J, Li J. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate vs adefovir dipivoxil in Chinese patients with chronic hepatitis B after 48 weeks: a randomized controlled trial. J Viral Hepat. 2015 Feb;22(2):85-93. doi: 10.1111/jvh.12313. Epub 2014 Sep 22.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 25243325 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

114648

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.