Effect of Platinum-based Versus Non-platinum-based Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Triple-negative Breast Cancer

NCT ID: NCT05872412

Last Updated: 2023-05-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

82 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-06-01

Study Completion Date

2024-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In this study, individuals with triple-negative breast cancer will receive either a platinum-based or non-platinum-based preoperative chemotherapy treatment. This study will help us identify which option is the most effective and safe.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Breast cancer is a significant health concern, and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a particularly aggressive and lethal subtype. Chemotherapy is currently the only recommended systemic treatment for TNBC, with the standard regimen being a combination of anthracyclines and taxanes. Platinum agents have shown promising results in TNBC neoadjuvant chemotherapy due to their ability to damage DNA and be more effective in tumors with dysfunctional DNA repair mechanisms. However, there is still a lack of consensus on the optimal neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen for TNBC. This study will be conducted to compare the responses and toxicities of platinum-based versus non-platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in TNBC patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the Department of Clinical Oncology of Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Shahbagh, Dhaka. After pretreatment evaluation, a total of 82 patients who fulfill the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be divided into Arm A and Arm B by simple random sampling. After the completion of the chemotherapy, all patients will undergo surgical management. A postoperative histopathology report will be collected and assessed by the investigator. During the treatment, the patients will be monitored before each cycle of chemotherapy, including physical examinations and laboratory investigations. All the relevant data will be compiled on a master chart first, and then statistical analysis of the results will be obtained by using Windows-based computer software facilities with Statistical Packages for Social Sciences. The data will be analyzed using the Chi-square test and the "T' test. The results will be presented in tables, figures, and diagrams. A significant value of 'p' will be decided at a level of 0.05 in two-tailed tests.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Triple Negative Breast Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

This is a double-blinded randomized controlled trial to explore the efficacy and toxicity of platinum-based versus non-platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Platinum-based regimen

Patients will be treated with doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 IV on day 1 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 IV on day 1 every 3 weeks for four cycles, followed by paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 IV weekly for 12 weeks concurrently with carboplatin (area under the curve: 6 mg/ml/min, i.v. every 3 weeks for four cycles).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Doxorubicin

Intervention Type DRUG

60 mg/m2 IV bolus on day 1 every three weeks for four cycles.

Cyclophosphamide

Intervention Type DRUG

600 mg/m2 IV over 1 hour on day 1 every three weeks for four cycles.

Paclitaxel

Intervention Type DRUG

80 mg/m2 IV over 1 hour weekly for 12 weeks

Carboplatin

Intervention Type DRUG

Area under the curve: 6 mg/ml/min, i.v. every 3 weeks for four cycles

Non-platinum based regimen

Patients will be treated with doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 IV on day 1 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 IV on day 1 every 3 weeks for four cycles, followed by paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 IV weekly for 12 weeks.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Doxorubicin

Intervention Type DRUG

60 mg/m2 IV bolus on day 1 every three weeks for four cycles.

Cyclophosphamide

Intervention Type DRUG

600 mg/m2 IV over 1 hour on day 1 every three weeks for four cycles.

Paclitaxel

Intervention Type DRUG

80 mg/m2 IV over 1 hour weekly for 12 weeks

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Doxorubicin

60 mg/m2 IV bolus on day 1 every three weeks for four cycles.

Intervention Type DRUG

Cyclophosphamide

600 mg/m2 IV over 1 hour on day 1 every three weeks for four cycles.

Intervention Type DRUG

Paclitaxel

80 mg/m2 IV over 1 hour weekly for 12 weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

Carboplatin

Area under the curve: 6 mg/ml/min, i.v. every 3 weeks for four cycles

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Adriamycin Cytoxan Taxol Paraplatin

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Triple-negative breast cancer
* Stage II and III

Exclusion Criteria

* Double primaries
* Male breast cancer
* Pregnant or lactating women
* Patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status more than two
* Patients below 18 years old
* Initial surgery of the primary site (excluding diagnostic biopsy)
* Serious concomitant medical illness including clinically significant cardiovascular disease
* Major surgery or trauma in the previous four weeks
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka, Bangladesh

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mohammad Jahan Shams

Medical Officer, Department of Clinical Oncology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mohammad J Shams, MBBS, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka, Bangladesh

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University

Dhaka, , Bangladesh

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Bangladesh

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Mohammad J Shams, MBBS, MD

Role: CONTACT

+8801911177774

Sajib K Talukdhar, MBBS, MD

Role: CONTACT

+8801723620231

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Sajib K Talukdhar, MBBS, MD

Role: primary

+8801723620231

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

von Minckwitz G, Schneeweiss A, Loibl S, Salat C, Denkert C, Rezai M, Blohmer JU, Jackisch C, Paepke S, Gerber B, Zahm DM, Kummel S, Eidtmann H, Klare P, Huober J, Costa S, Tesch H, Hanusch C, Hilfrich J, Khandan F, Fasching PA, Sinn BV, Engels K, Mehta K, Nekljudova V, Untch M. Neoadjuvant carboplatin in patients with triple-negative and HER2-positive early breast cancer (GeparSixto; GBG 66): a randomised phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014 Jun;15(7):747-56. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70160-3. Epub 2014 Apr 30.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24794243 (View on PubMed)

Zhang P, Yin Y, Mo H, Zhang B, Wang X, Li Q, Yuan P, Wang J, Zheng S, Cai R, Ma F, Fan Y, Xu B. Better pathologic complete response and relapse-free survival after carboplatin plus paclitaxel compared with epirubicin plus paclitaxel as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced triple-negative breast cancer: a randomized phase 2 trial. Oncotarget. 2016 Sep 13;7(37):60647-60656. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.10607.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27447966 (View on PubMed)

Sikov WM, Berry DA, Perou CM, Singh B, Cirrincione CT, Tolaney SM, Kuzma CS, Pluard TJ, Somlo G, Port ER, Golshan M, Bellon JR, Collyar D, Hahn OM, Carey LA, Hudis CA, Winer EP. Impact of the addition of carboplatin and/or bevacizumab to neoadjuvant once-per-week paclitaxel followed by dose-dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide on pathologic complete response rates in stage II to III triple-negative breast cancer: CALGB 40603 (Alliance). J Clin Oncol. 2015 Jan 1;33(1):13-21. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.57.0572. Epub 2014 Aug 4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25092775 (View on PubMed)

Kumar P, Aggarwal R. An overview of triple-negative breast cancer. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016 Feb;293(2):247-69. doi: 10.1007/s00404-015-3859-y. Epub 2015 Sep 4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26341644 (View on PubMed)

Dent R, Trudeau M, Pritchard KI, Hanna WM, Kahn HK, Sawka CA, Lickley LA, Rawlinson E, Sun P, Narod SA. Triple-negative breast cancer: clinical features and patterns of recurrence. Clin Cancer Res. 2007 Aug 1;13(15 Pt 1):4429-34. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-3045.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17671126 (View on PubMed)

Jin J, Zhang W, Ji W, Yang F, Guan X. Predictive biomarkers for triple negative breast cancer treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. Cancer Biol Ther. 2017 Jun 3;18(6):369-378. doi: 10.1080/15384047.2017.1323582. Epub 2017 May 11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28494179 (View on PubMed)

Lips EH, Mulder L, Oonk A, van der Kolk LE, Hogervorst FB, Imholz AL, Wesseling J, Rodenhuis S, Nederlof PM. Triple-negative breast cancer: BRCAness and concordance of clinical features with BRCA1-mutation carriers. Br J Cancer. 2013 May 28;108(10):2172-7. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.144. Epub 2013 Apr 4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23558900 (View on PubMed)

Prat A, Cruz C, Hoadley KA, Diez O, Perou CM, Balmana J. Molecular features of the basal-like breast cancer subtype based on BRCA1 mutation status. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014 Aug;147(1):185-91. doi: 10.1007/s10549-014-3056-x. Epub 2014 Jul 22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25048467 (View on PubMed)

Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33538338 (View on PubMed)

Telli ML, Hellyer J, Audeh W, Jensen KC, Bose S, Timms KM, Gutin A, Abkevich V, Peterson RN, Neff C, Hughes E, Sangale Z, Jones J, Hartman AR, Chang PJ, Vinayak S, Wenstrup R, Ford JM. Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) status predicts response to standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with triple-negative or BRCA1/2 mutation-associated breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Apr;168(3):625-630. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4624-7. Epub 2017 Dec 23.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29275435 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

BSMMU/2023/6669

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.