Comparison of TP and TAC Regimens in Neoadjuvant Treatment of TNBC

NCT ID: NCT04664972

Last Updated: 2024-09-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

212 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-11-23

Study Completion Date

2022-11-26

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Previous studies have shown that TNBC is sensitive to DNA crosslinking-related chemotherapeutic drugs such as platinum. However, there is a lack of large sample prospective clinical data to compare the efficacy of TP and EC-T / TEC regimen in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy of TNBC. Besides, the application of anthracycline drugs is limited to a certain extent due to the cardiotoxicity. Based on the above evidence, the researchers hope to explore a more effective and safer new adjuvant therapy for TNBC.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In this study, TNBC patients were randomly divided into experimental group and control group, the ratio of experimental group to control group was 1:1. The experimental group received 6 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (docetaxel 75 mg / m2 day 1 + cisplatin 25 mg / m2 day 1, 2, 3), 21 days as a cycle. The control group was treated with TAC (docetaxel 75mg / M2 + adriamycin 50mg / M2 + cyclophosphamide 500mg / m2) for 6 cycles, 21 days as a cycle. To compare the efficacy and safety of 6\*TP (docetaxel + cisplatin) regimen and traditional 6\*TAC (docetaxel + doxorubicin + cyclophosphamide) regimen in neoadjuvant chemotherapy of TNBC.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Triple Negative Breast Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

TAC regimen group

The control group was treated with TAC (docetaxel 75mg/m2 + adriamycin 50mg /m2 + cyclophosphamide 500mg/m2) for 6 cycles, 21 days as a cycle.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Docetaxel +doxorubicin+ cyclophosphamide

Intervention Type DRUG

The control group was treated with TAC (docetaxel 75 mg / m2 + adriamycin 50 mg / m2 + cyclophosphamide 500 mg / m2) for 6 cycles, 21 days was a cycle.

TP regimen group

The experimental group was treated with TP (docetaxel 75mg/m2 day 1 + cisplatin 25 mg/m2 day 1,2,3) neoadjuvant chemotherapy for 6 cycles, 21 days as a cycle.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Docetaxel +Cisplatin

Intervention Type DRUG

The experimental group was treated with TP (docetaxel 75mg/m2 day 1 + cisplatin 25 mg/m2 day 1,2,3) neoadjuvant chemotherapy for 6 cycles, 21 days as a cycle.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Docetaxel +doxorubicin+ cyclophosphamide

The control group was treated with TAC (docetaxel 75 mg / m2 + adriamycin 50 mg / m2 + cyclophosphamide 500 mg / m2) for 6 cycles, 21 days was a cycle.

Intervention Type DRUG

Docetaxel +Cisplatin

The experimental group was treated with TP (docetaxel 75mg/m2 day 1 + cisplatin 25 mg/m2 day 1,2,3) neoadjuvant chemotherapy for 6 cycles, 21 days as a cycle.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

TAC regimen group TP regimen group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age: 18-70.
2. Clinical stage Ⅱ-Ⅲ.
3. triple negative and invasive breast cancer confirmed by histopathology:

Triple negative breast cancer is defined as:
* negative for ER and PR (IHC nuclear staining \< 10%).
* Her-2 negative (IHC 0,1 + without FISH, or IHC 2 + and without FISH amplification).
4. With clinically measurable focus: Measurable lesions observed on ultrasound, mammography, or magnetic resonance imaging (optional) within the month prior to randomization.
5. Organ and bone marrow function tests within 1 month before chemotherapy indicate no contraindications to chemotherapy:

* neutrophils count absolute value ≥ 2.0×109/L
* hemoglobin ≥ 100g/L
* blood platelet ≥ 100×109/L
* total bilirubin \< 1.5 ULN (upline of normal value)
* creatinine \< 1.5×ULN
* AST/ALT \< 1.5×ULN;
6. Cardiac ultrasound EF value ≥ 55%.
7. Females of childbearing age with negative serum pregnancy test 14 days before randomization.
8. ECOG score ≤1.
9. Sign informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Evidence of metastatic breast cancer (excluding metastatic breast cancer, a chest CT, abdominal ultrasound, or CT and bone scanning should be performed at any time point before diagnosis and randomization; PET/CT scanning can be used as an alternative imaging examination mean) .
2. The patients have received chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, targeted therapy, and radiation therapy for this disease.
3. The patient has a second primary malignant tumor, except for:

\- Thoroughly treated skin cancer
4. Due to severe and uncontrollable other medical diseases, researchers believe the existence of chemotherapy contraindications.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Henan Cancer Hospital

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Zhenzhen Liu

Director

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Zhenzhen Liu

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Henan Cancer Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Henan Cancer Hospital

Zhengzhou, Henan, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HELEN-001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

TAC Versus TC for Adjuvant Breast Cancer
NCT00493870 COMPLETED PHASE3