DCb (Docetaxel/Carboplatin) Versus EC-D (Epirubicin/Cyclophosphamide Followed by Docetaxe) as Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

NCT ID: NCT03154749

Last Updated: 2022-09-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

93 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-09-01

Study Completion Date

2019-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Both DCb (docetaxel/carboplatin) and EC followed by D (epirubicin/cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxe) regimens as Neoadjuvant Treatment for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer have been recommended by NCCN guideline. It is unknown which regimen is better. This study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DCb (docetaxel/carboplatin) and EC followed by D(epirubicin/cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxe) regimens as Neoadjuvant Treatment in Triple-Negative breast cancer. The endpoint of pathologic complete response is used as a surrogate marker for survival. Safety and tolerability assessed by number of grade 4 toxicities and hospitalizations.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a subtype lacking estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2) amplification. TNBC accounts for 15-20% of all invasive breast cancer. Although PARP inhibitors and immunotherapy may play a role in the treatment of early TNBC, the mainstay of treatment for TNBC is cytotoxic chemotherapy. However, despite its sensitivity to chemotherapy, TNBC is still associated with a poor prognosis.

TNBC is usually recommended for neoadjuvant therapy. The benefits of neoadjuvant therapy include reducing the size of the tumor to suit breast conserving surgery, avoiding axillary lymph node dissection, making inoperable tumors operable, and obtaining an in vivo evaluation of the tumor's chemosensitivity. Taxane- and anthracycline-based neoadjuvant regimens have become a standard treatment for TNBC, and patients have been proved to have better event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) who achieve a pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy1.

Carboplatin attack cancer cells by inducing double-stranded DNA breaks, and TNBC may be sensitive to carboplatin2. Previous studies have shown that adding carboplatin to neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens significantly improved pCR rate in TNBC patients3, 4.

Due to the long-term cardiotoxicity caused by anthracycline, several studies have explored the efficacy of neoadjuvant paclitaxel plus carboplatin regimens in TNBC and have achieved satisfactory pCR rates, but there are still controversies5. However, there is no study making comparisons between the combination of taxanes and carboplatin without anthracycline and the standard neoadjuvant regimens. Whether the combination of taxanes and carboplatin without anthracycline can achieve better efficacy while reducing adverse reactions still needs to be explored.

The NeoCART study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of docetaxel plus carboplatin with standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy in TNBC.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

DCb

Docetaxel (75 mg/m2 administered intravenously every 3 weeks) and carboplatin (area under the concentration-time curve \[AUC\] 6, intravenously every 3 weeks) for six cycles

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

DCb (docetaxel/carboplatin) versus EC followed by D (epirubicin/cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxe)

Intervention Type DRUG

All eligible patients were randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio to the experimental arm (docetaxel (75 mg/m2 administered intravenously every 3 weeks) plus carboplatin (AUC 6 mg/mL per min, intravenously every 3 weeks) for six cycles) or the standard treatment arm (epirubicin (90 mg/m2) plus cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2), both administered intravenously every 3 weeks for four cycles, followed by docetaxel (100 mg/m2) administered intravenously every 3 weeks for four cycles).

EC-D

Epirubicin (90 mg/m2) plus cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2), both administered intravenously every 3 weeks for four cycles, followed by docetaxel (100 mg/m2) administered intravenously every 3 weeks for four cycles

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

DCb (docetaxel/carboplatin) versus EC followed by D (epirubicin/cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxe)

Intervention Type DRUG

All eligible patients were randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio to the experimental arm (docetaxel (75 mg/m2 administered intravenously every 3 weeks) plus carboplatin (AUC 6 mg/mL per min, intravenously every 3 weeks) for six cycles) or the standard treatment arm (epirubicin (90 mg/m2) plus cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2), both administered intravenously every 3 weeks for four cycles, followed by docetaxel (100 mg/m2) administered intravenously every 3 weeks for four cycles).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

DCb (docetaxel/carboplatin) versus EC followed by D (epirubicin/cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxe)

All eligible patients were randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio to the experimental arm (docetaxel (75 mg/m2 administered intravenously every 3 weeks) plus carboplatin (AUC 6 mg/mL per min, intravenously every 3 weeks) for six cycles) or the standard treatment arm (epirubicin (90 mg/m2) plus cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2), both administered intravenously every 3 weeks for four cycles, followed by docetaxel (100 mg/m2) administered intravenously every 3 weeks for four cycles).

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Exclusion Criteria

Patients who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded from study entry:

* Stage IV (metastatic) breast cancer
* Patients with a history of invasive breast cancer.
* Patients with a history of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), except for patients treated exclusively with mastectomy \> 5 years prior to diagnosis of current breast cancer
* Patients with bilateral breast cancer
* Prior chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, biologic therapy, investigational agent, targeted therapy or radiation therapy for current breast cancer.
* Patients who have undergone incisional and/or excisional biopsy of primary tumor and/or axillary lymph nodes
* History of previous or current malignancy at other sites with the exception of adequately treated carcinoma in-situ of the cervix or basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin. Patients with a history of other malignancies, who remain disease free for greater than five years are eligible.
* Current severe, uncontrolled systemic disease that may interfere with planned treatment (e.g., clinically significant cardiovascular, pulmonary, or metabolic disease; wound-healing disorders)
* Major surgical procedure unrelated to breast cancer or significant traumatic injury within 28 days prior to randomization or anticipation of the need for major surgery during the course of study treatment
* Current pregnancy and/or breastfeeding
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Shantou Central Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Henan Cancer Hospital

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Dongguan People's Hospital

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Baotou Cancer Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Kun Wang

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Wang Kun, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Study Chair

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Guangdong General Hospital

Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Zhu T, Huang YH, Li W, Wu CG, Zhang YM, Zheng XX, Zhang TF, Lin YY, Liu ZY, Ye GL, Lin Y, Wu ZY, Wang K. A non-invasive artificial intelligence model for identifying axillary pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: a secondary analysis to multicenter clinical trial. Br J Cancer. 2024 Sep;131(4):692-701. doi: 10.1038/s41416-024-02726-3. Epub 2024 Jun 25.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38918556 (View on PubMed)

Yang C, Li P, Chen Y, Zheng J, Zhang X, Gao HF, Zhang L, Wang K. Pooled analysis of NeoCARH and NeoCART trials: patient-reported outcomes in patients with early-stage breast cancer receiving platinum-based or anthracycline-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Support Care Cancer. 2024 Jun 3;32(6):401. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08610-3.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38829506 (View on PubMed)

Zhang L, Wu Z, Li J, Zhu D, Yang L, Shao Y, Lin Y, Liu Z, Cao Y, Zhang G, Shang S, Zhang Y, Wang K. Impact of Homologous Recombination Deficiency on Outcomes in Patients With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Treated With Carboplatin-Based Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Secondary Analysis of the NeoCART Randomized Clinical Trial. JCO Precis Oncol. 2023 Jan;7:e2200337. doi: 10.1200/PO.22.00337.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36652665 (View on PubMed)

Li WP, Zhu T, Hu MX, Yang M, Ji F, Gao HF, Yang CQ, Zhang LL, Cheng MY, Xu FP, Wang K. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of the EC-T (epirubicin/cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel) and TCb (docetaxel/carboplatin) neoadjuvant regimens in early TOP2A-normal stage II-III breast cancer. Neoplasma. 2020 Nov;67(6):1409-1415. doi: 10.4149/neo_2020_200130N96. Epub 2020 Jul 13.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32657611 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

20170512

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.