Long-term Outcomes of Breast Cancer Patients After Wound Infiltration Analgesia
NCT ID: NCT05829707
Last Updated: 2023-04-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
120 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-01-05
2023-04-05
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
1. Diclofenac 2 mg/kg/day - control,
2. Wound infiltration via wound catheter with catheter tip placed in the axilla, 3\*0.5 mg/kg 0.5% levobupivacaine bolus dose.
3. 0.05 mg/kg/h 0.5% levobupivacaine continuously via wound infiltration catheter with catheter tip placed in the axilla. The drug was delivered using a PCA pump for 24 hours.
The aim was to compare early postoperative outcomes - pain control on a visual analog scale of 1-10, hand grip strength, and quality of life after surgery and after 1 year.
Long-term survival was examined subsequently, from the hospital register.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Immune Response of Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Levobupivacaine Using Paravertebral or Superficial Chest Blocks
NCT05816538
Wound Infiltration and Breast Cancer Surgery
NCT01404377
Effect of Early Removal of Wound Drains After Mastectomy or Lymph Node Dissection
NCT03104153
Symptom Management After Breast Cancer Surgery
NCT00686127
PECI/SPB vs Intercostal Nerve Block for the Management of Postoperative Pain in Latissimus Dorsi Flap Reconstruction
NCT02821676
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Diclofenac
All patients underwent quadrantectomy or mastectomy with axillary lymph node dissection. They received diclofenac 2 x 75 mg intravenously on the first day after surgery. During the 3 subsequent days, from day 2 to day 4 postoperatively patients were given 3 x 50 mg diclofenac tablets orally. The medicine was delivered by the nurse, and the patients drank tablets in front of her.
Diclofenac Sodium
A group of patients with breast cancer who were randomized to the diclofenac group by drawing random numbers was given 2 x 75 mg of drug IV on the first PO day and then 3 x 50 mg tablets orally for postoperative analgesia.
All patients were assessed before the surgical procedure: hand grip strength, shoulder disability, and health-related quality of life were measured. Pain relief was assessed by the visual analog scale (VAS) from 0-10.
Rescue analgesia was offered for pain \>4 on the VAS, meperidine 20-30 mg for VAS \>or = 4
Levobupivacaine bolus analgesia
Group Levobupivacaine Bolus received 0.5 mg/kg 0.5% Levobupivacaine HCl every 8 h via wound catheter. The dose of levobupivacaine was prescribed by the doctor and the drug was delivered by the nurse.
Levobupivacaine bolus analgesia
The levobupivacaine dose was calculated by a doctor. A wound infiltration catheter was inserted at the end of the surgical procedure by a surgeon. A first dose of local anesthetic was delivered at the end of the surgical procedure to test catheter placement. Bolus doses of local anesthetics based on the patients' body weight were thereafter delivered by the nurse in 8 hours intervals.
All patients were assessed before the surgical procedure and hand grip strength, shoulder disability, and health-related quality of life were measured. Pain relief was assessed by the visual analog scale (VAS) from 0-10.
Rescue analgesia was offered for pain \>4 on the VAS, meperidine 20-30 mg for VAS \>or = 4.
Levobupivacaine PCA group
Group Levobupivacaine patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) received 0.05 mg/kg 0.5% Levobupivacaine HCl continuously via wound catheter delivered by CADD - Legacy® PCA Pump. These patients were allowed to add a dose of 7.5 mg 0.5% levobupivacaine in case of pain by pressing the patient's button on the PCA pump, with a lock-out period of 4 hours.
Levobupivacaine PCA group
The levobupivacaine dose was calculated by a doctor. A wound infiltration catheter was inserted at the end of the surgical procedure by a surgeon. Levobupivacaine was delivered by PCA pump (CADD - Legacy® PCA Pump, Model 6300, Smiths Medical MD, Inc., St. Paul, USA). A drug delivery was started at the end of the surgical procedure.
All patients were assessed before the surgical procedure: hand grip strength, shoulder disability, and health-related quality of life were measured. Pain relief was assessed by the visual analog scale (VAS) from 0-10.
Rescue analgesia was offered for persisting pain \>4 on the VAS, and meperidine 20-30 mg for VAS \>or = 4.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Diclofenac Sodium
A group of patients with breast cancer who were randomized to the diclofenac group by drawing random numbers was given 2 x 75 mg of drug IV on the first PO day and then 3 x 50 mg tablets orally for postoperative analgesia.
All patients were assessed before the surgical procedure: hand grip strength, shoulder disability, and health-related quality of life were measured. Pain relief was assessed by the visual analog scale (VAS) from 0-10.
Rescue analgesia was offered for pain \>4 on the VAS, meperidine 20-30 mg for VAS \>or = 4
Levobupivacaine bolus analgesia
The levobupivacaine dose was calculated by a doctor. A wound infiltration catheter was inserted at the end of the surgical procedure by a surgeon. A first dose of local anesthetic was delivered at the end of the surgical procedure to test catheter placement. Bolus doses of local anesthetics based on the patients' body weight were thereafter delivered by the nurse in 8 hours intervals.
All patients were assessed before the surgical procedure and hand grip strength, shoulder disability, and health-related quality of life were measured. Pain relief was assessed by the visual analog scale (VAS) from 0-10.
Rescue analgesia was offered for pain \>4 on the VAS, meperidine 20-30 mg for VAS \>or = 4.
Levobupivacaine PCA group
The levobupivacaine dose was calculated by a doctor. A wound infiltration catheter was inserted at the end of the surgical procedure by a surgeon. Levobupivacaine was delivered by PCA pump (CADD - Legacy® PCA Pump, Model 6300, Smiths Medical MD, Inc., St. Paul, USA). A drug delivery was started at the end of the surgical procedure.
All patients were assessed before the surgical procedure: hand grip strength, shoulder disability, and health-related quality of life were measured. Pain relief was assessed by the visual analog scale (VAS) from 0-10.
Rescue analgesia was offered for persisting pain \>4 on the VAS, and meperidine 20-30 mg for VAS \>or = 4.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* who consented to participate in the study
* aged 30 - 75
* The patient is able to understand all three methods of analgesia
* Patients can receive any of the study drugs
* Able to understand and complete questionnaires on quality of life and shoulder pain
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients who refused to participate in the study (at any stage of the study)
* Patients who after histological analysis did not require axillary lymph node dissection
* Patients with known intolerance to study drugs
* Patients who unintentionally removed wound infiltration catheters.
* Patients who required surgical reintervention during the study period
* Patients having adverse reactions to any study drug.
30 Years
75 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Osijek University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Josipa Glavas Tahtler, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Department of Anaesthesiology, Resuscitation and ICU, Osijek University Hospital,
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Beguinot M, Monrigal E, Kwiatkowski F, Ginzac A, Joly D, Gayraud G, Le Bouedec G, Gimbergues P. Continuous Wound Infiltration With Ropivacaine After Mastectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Surg Res. 2020 Oct;254:318-326. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.05.006. Epub 2020 Jun 5.
Kaur U, Shamshery C, Agarwal A, Prakash N, Valiveru RC, Mishra P. Evaluation of postoperative pain in patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy with pectoralis or serratus-intercostal fascial plane blocks. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2020 Oct;73(5):425-433. doi: 10.4097/kja.20159. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
Li R, Xiao C, Liu H, Huang Y, Dilger JP, Lin J. Effects of local anesthetics on breast cancer cell viability and migration. BMC Cancer. 2018 Jun 19;18(1):666. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4576-2.
Chen JL, Liu ST, Huang SM, Wu ZF. Apoptosis, Proliferation, and Autophagy Are Involved in Local Anesthetic-Induced Cytotoxicity of Human Breast Cancer Cells. Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Dec 7;23(24):15455. doi: 10.3390/ijms232415455.
Castelli V, Piroli A, Marinangeli F, d'Angelo M, Benedetti E, Ippoliti R, Zis P, Varrassi G, Giordano A, Paladini A, Cimini A. Local anesthetics counteract cell proliferation and migration of human triple-negative breast cancer and melanoma cells. J Cell Physiol. 2020 Apr;235(4):3474-3484. doi: 10.1002/jcp.29236. Epub 2019 Sep 20.
Kwakye AK, Kampo S, Lv J, Ramzan MN, Richard SA, Falagan AA, Agudogo J, Atito-Narh E, Yan Q, Wen QP. Levobupivacaine inhibits proliferation and promotes apoptosis of breast cancer cells by suppressing the PI3K/Akt/mTOR signalling pathway. BMC Res Notes. 2020 Aug 17;13(1):386. doi: 10.1186/s13104-020-05191-2.
Klein I, Kalichman L, Chen N, Susmallian S. Effect of physical activity levels on oncological breast surgery recovery: a prospective cohort study. Sci Rep. 2021 May 17;11(1):10432. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-89908-8.
Meerkerk CDA, Chargi N, de Jong PA, van den Bos F, de Bree R. Sarcopenia measured with handgrip strength and skeletal muscle mass to assess frailty in older patients with head and neck cancer. J Geriatr Oncol. 2021 Apr;12(3):434-440. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2020.10.002. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
Glavas Tahtler J, Djapic D, Neferanovic M, Miletic J, Milosevic M, Kralik K, Neskovic N, Tomas I, Mesaric D, Marjanovic K, Rajc J, Orkic Z, Cicvaric A, Kvolik S. Long-Term Outcomes of Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Levobupivacaine Wound Infiltration or Diclofenac for Postoperative Pain Relief. Pharmaceutics. 2023 Aug 23;15(9):2183. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15092183.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
OsijekUH21
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.