Blinding Assessment of Manual Therapy Interventions of the Back in Swiss Graduate Students

NCT ID: NCT05822947

Last Updated: 2023-04-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

24 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-11-07

Study Completion Date

2022-11-08

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

There is marked uncertainty regarding the feasibility of achieving adequate blinding in randomized controlled trials of manual therapy. In other words, whether participants and outcome assessors can accurately perceive randomly assigned interventions is unclear. This feasibility trial was conducted as part of a doctoral epidemiology course at the University of Zurich, Switzerland. Within the practice-based context of the class and using a study population of healthy graduate students enrolled in the course, the investigators aimed to evaluate blinding of participants randomly assigned (similar to tossing a coin) to one of two manual therapy interventions (active versus control). The investigators also aimed to assess blinding among outcome assessors.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Manual therapy remains a guideline-compliant, first-line therapeutic option for back pain. Yet, maintaining methodological quality in randomized controlled trials of manual therapy interventions poses challenges, particularly concerning: (a) The design of adequate 'sham' controls and (b) the blinding status of participants and outcome assessors. Optimal implementation of large-scale manual therapy trials requires testing the feasibility of control manual therapy interventions and effective blinding of participants and outcome assessors. Even when conducted in healthy populations and non-clinical settings, blinding feasibility trials remain an opportunity for methodological advancement in the field of manual medicine, and a research priority for unbiased treatment effect estimation in future trials.

The primary objective of this methodological trial was to quantitatively assess blinding feasibility among participants (graduate students enrolled in an epidemiology Ph.D. course) assigned to an active or control intervention immediately after a one-time intervention session. The secondary objective was to assess blinding feasibility among outcome assessors and explore factors influencing perceptions about intervention assignment among participants and outcome assessors. These two objectives contributed to obtaining valuable preliminary measures of blinding (blinding indices) for a future methodological blinding feasibility trial to be carried out in a real-world clinical setting.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Back Pain Back Disorder Back Pain, Low

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Single centre, two-parallel group, blinding feasibility randomized controlled trial.
Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors
Blinding was the primary outcome of interest. That said, except for intervention providers, every role was, by protocol, blinded to intervention assignment.

To maintain blinding of participants, candidate participants were formally invited to participate by email, with a study information form that masked the blinding feasibility objective.

The intervention providers were kept in a separate room and could not be blinded but were asked not to disclose the intervention group or the nature of the control MT component to participants, outcome assessors, data analysts, and other members of the study team.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Active manual therapy

Active manual therapy intervention involved mobilization of the lumbar paraspinal musculature. With participants laying prone on a chiropractic table, the intervention provider administered hand-reinforced circumferential movements to six focal areas, using continuous ischemic compression strokes, and adjusting the pressure to participants' tolerability.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Active manual therapy

Intervention Type OTHER

Soft tissue mobilization of the lumbar paraspinal musculature (3 to 4 minutes).

Control manual therapy

Control MT intervention included light touch to six distal, broad areas of the thoracic region, with a synchronized breathing exercise.

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Control manual therapy

Intervention Type OTHER

Light touch and a breathing exercise (3 to 4 minutes).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Active manual therapy

Soft tissue mobilization of the lumbar paraspinal musculature (3 to 4 minutes).

Intervention Type OTHER

Control manual therapy

Light touch and a breathing exercise (3 to 4 minutes).

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 18 years of age or older
* enrolled in a doctoral-level epidemiology course at the University of Zurich, Switzerland.

Exclusion Criteria

* serious pathology (i.e., cancer, severe scoliosis, inflammatory disease, infection, cauda equina syndrome or progressive motor deficit)
* history of spine surgery
* obvious contraindication to manual therapy (i.e., spinal fracture)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Zurich

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Cesar A HincapiƩ, DC PhD

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Cesar A HincapiƩ, DC PhD

Senior Scientist and Head of Musculoskeletal Epidemiology Research

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Cesar A HincapiƩ, DC PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Balgrist University Hospital and University of Zurich

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Zurich

Zurich, Canton of Zurich, Switzerland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Switzerland

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Munoz Laguna J, Nyantakyi E, Bhattacharyya U, Blum K, Delucchi M, Klingebiel FK, Labarile M, Roggo A, Weber M, Radtke T, Puhan MA, Hincapie CA. Is blinding in studies of manual soft tissue mobilisation of the back possible? A feasibility randomised controlled trial with Swiss graduate students. Chiropr Man Therap. 2024 Jan 29;32(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12998-023-00524-x.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38287417 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SENSATE Blinding

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.