Clinical Performance and Cost Effectiveness of Biatain® Silicone Compared With Standard of Care
NCT ID: NCT05786612
Last Updated: 2025-03-05
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
102 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-01-30
2023-12-27
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This study (BISIL) will compare the Biatain® Silicone dressing to commonly used wound care products (AQUACEL®EXTRATM Hydrofiber® Dressing used with Mepilex® Border).
The study will recruit in total 100 adult subjects with a venous leg ulcer or a diabetic foot ulcer no deeper than 2cm. Only ulcers with a duration of at least 8 weeks but no longer than a year will be included. The study will be a randomised controlled trial where half of the participants will use Biatain® Silicone and half will use the comparator for 4 weeks. Each participant will be in the study for 4-5 weeks during which there will be a weekly visit with the study team to complete the study assessments and change the dressing. The study will run for approximately one year, starting in January 2023.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A RCT Evaluating the Clinical Benefit of a Silver Dressing in the Treatment of Venous Leg Ulcers
NCT05923749
Investigation of the Clinical Performance of Biatain Fiber Ag on Venous Leg Ulcers
NCT05873257
Biatain Ag vs Biatain in the Treament of Leg Ulcers
NCT00807664
Compare Aquacel® Ag Versus Mepilex® Border Ag to Manage Bioburden in Leg Ulcers
NCT01427491
Evaluation of Woulgan in Diabetic Foot Ulcer
NCT02631512
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The properties of a wound dressing can have a significant impact on wound healing and on the risk of developing infections. The ideal wound dressing should have good contact with the wound and be effective in absorbing and holding fluids. Biatain® Silicone uses 3DFit technology, which may support better contact with the wound, help to absorb fluid more effectively and reduce the risk of leakage. These properties may support faster wound healing and reduce complications.
This study (BISIL) will compare the Biatain® Silicone dressing to commonly used wound care products (AQUACEL®EXTRATM Hydrofiber® Dressing used with Mepilex® Border). All products used in this study are CE-marked medical devices which are already available in the UK. The main objective is to compare the reduction in wound area over four weeks between the two treatment groups. The study will also look at other aspects of wound healing and compare the costs of the dressings and the participants' quality of life during the study period. In a subgroup of participants, ultrasound will be used to assess the contact between the dressings and the wound.
The study will recruit in total 100 adult subjects with a venous leg ulcer or a diabetic foot ulcer no deeper than 2cm. Only ulcers with a duration of at least 8 weeks but no longer than a year will be included. Participants will be inpatients or outpatients recruited through 12-18 Tissue Viability Units and hospitals across the UK. The study will be a randomised controlled trial where half of the participants will use Biatain® Silicone and half will use the comparator for 4 weeks. Each participant will be in the study for 4-5 weeks during which there will be a weekly visit with the study team to complete the study assessments and change the dressing. The study will run for approximately one year, starting in January 2023.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Mepilex Border with Aquacel Extra Hydrofiber
Standard of care (filler, that functions as a primary dressing to manage exudate and the gap/space between the wound bed and the dressing, covered by a secondary dressing on top) defined in this study as Mepilex® Border with AQUACEL® Extra Hydrofiber Dressing
Mepilex Border with Aquacel Extra Hydrofiber
Wound care dressing
Biatain® Silicone
The investigational test product is Biatain® Silicone. Biatain® Silicone is intended to be used for moist wound healing and exudate management and can be used without a filler.
Biatain® Silicone
Wound care dressing
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Biatain® Silicone
Wound care dressing
Mepilex Border with Aquacel Extra Hydrofiber
Wound care dressing
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Is at least 18 years of age and has full legal capacity
* Has a venous leg ulcer (VLU) (C6 of the CEAP classification(1)) or a non-infected diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) with a duration longer than 8 weeks but no longer than 24 months
* Has a wound with depth1 down to 20 mm
* Has a maximum wound depth1 relative to wound diameter
* Has a wound with exudate levels requiring a filler and a standard secondary dressing
* Has acceptance of compression therapy in case of a VLU or off-loading in case of a DFU, according to local standards
* For subjects with diabetes, has HbA1c ≤ 10% or ≤ 86 mmol/mol, measured within the last 3 months prior to inclusion
Exclusion Criteria
* Wounds is with exposed tendons, is with bones or has fistulas
* Wound is with cavity, or is undermined or tunnelling
* Subject is receiving chemotherapy
* Subject has ankle-brachial pressure index (ABPI) below 0.8 measured within one month prior to inclusion
* Wound is larger than 10 x10 cm
* Currently enrolled in another wound care de-vice investigation unless co-enrolment has been agreed with the sponsor
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Coloplast A/S
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
David Voegeli
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
University of Winchester
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Norfolk Community Health and Care NHS Trust
Norwich, Bowthorpe Road Norwich, United Kingdom
Milton Keynes University Hospital
Milton Keynes, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom
North Cumbria Integrated Care
Carlisle, Cumbria, United Kingdom
Homerton Hospital
London, Greater London, United Kingdom
Somerset NHS Foundation Trust
Taunton, Somerset, United Kingdom
Torbay and South Devon
Torquay, Torbay, United Kingdom
Leeds Teaching Hospitals
Leeds, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom
Northumbria Healthcare
Ashington, , United Kingdom
Pioneer Wound care and Lymphoedema Centres
Eastbourne, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CP351
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.