VA MERIT: A Comparative Efficacy Study: Treatment of Non-Healing Diabetic
NCT ID: NCT01450943
Last Updated: 2019-09-17
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
120 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-10-01
2018-04-04
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluating the Efficacy of Perinatal Membrane Allografts in Addition to the Standard of Care for the Treatment of Non-healing Diabetic Foot Ulcers.
NCT06437028
Resorbable Glass Fiber Matrix in the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers
NCT03398538
Evaluating Several Cellular, Acellular, and Matrix-like Products (CAMPs) and Standard of Care Versus Standard of Care Alone in the Management of Nonhealing Diabetic Foot and Venous Leg Ulcers.
NCT06826339
Dermagraft(R) for the Treatment of Patients With Diabetic Foot Ulcers
NCT01181440
Efficacy and Safety Study of Dermal-Living Skin Replacement to Treat Diabetic Foot Ulcers
NCT00368693
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Standard of care
debridement, irrigation , PRIMARY dressing Adaptic and Iodosorb, SECONDARY dressing gauze and tape
SECONDARY dressing gauze and tape
SECONDARY dressing gauze and tape
debridement, irrigation
debridement, irrigation
Dermagraft
debridement, irrigation , PRIMARY dressing Dermagraft and Adaptic, SECONDARY dressing gauze and tape
SECONDARY dressing gauze and tape
SECONDARY dressing gauze and tape
debridement, irrigation
debridement, irrigation
Dermagraft
Dermagraft per company protocol
Oasis
debridement, irrigation , PRIMARY dressing Oasis and Adaptic, SECONDARY dressing gauze and tape
SECONDARY dressing gauze and tape
SECONDARY dressing gauze and tape
debridement, irrigation
debridement, irrigation
Oasis
Oasis per company protocol
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
SECONDARY dressing gauze and tape
SECONDARY dressing gauze and tape
debridement, irrigation
debridement, irrigation
Dermagraft
Dermagraft per company protocol
Oasis
Oasis per company protocol
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* An Institutional Review Board (IRB) Informed Consent Form signed and dated prior to any study-related activities.
* The area of the study ulcer after debridement is between 1 cm2 and 25 cm2 at Visit 3/Week 0.
* Subjects between 18 and 85 years of age.
* Subject's highest Ankle-Brachial Pressure Index (ABPI) / Ankle-Arm Index (AAI) is greater than or equal to 0.80 and lower than 1.4 (the highest ABPI/AAI value from three measurements within last 6 months shall apply).or a toe-arm index is equal to or higher than 0.6.
* The patient has one or more diabetic ulcers on the target foot with only one ulcer selected as the study (target) ulcer. The target ulcer must be at least 4 cm from a non-target ulcer and in the Investigator's opinion, be unlikely to coalesce with another ulcer within 12 weeks of randomization.
* Subject's study ulcer is full thickness and does not extend to bone, muscle, or tendon.
* Subject's study ulcer has been present at least 4 weeks prior to the initial screening (Visit 1) or 6 weeks at randomization (Visit 3).
* Subject has been diagnosed with Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes and HbA1c is less than 10%.
* Study ulcer has no clinical feature of infection (2 signs of inflammation and elevated bacterial load of the wound).
* For female subjects of childbearing age potential, the subject has a negative pregnancy test and is not lactating for the duration of the study.
* Subject understands the requirements of this study and is willing to comply with all the study requirements.
Exclusion Criteria
* The subject is diagnosed with cancer and is undergoing treatment with immunosuppressive or chemotherapeutic agents, radiotherapy or systemic corticosteroids less than 30 days before enrollment.
* The subject is diagnosed with HIV/AIDS.
* The subject is diagnosed with any bleeding disorders.
* The subject is diagnosed with any connective tissue diseases.
* For female subjects, the subject is pregnant or lactating.
* The subject has a history of illicit drug use within one year of enrollment.
* In the past year, the subject experiences episodes of drinking more than 5 alcoholic beverages in less than two hours and/or drinking alcohol has become a problem in interpersonal relationships, work, driving and/or their behavior in general.
* The subject has any active infected wounds or osteomyelitis (confirmed by bone biopsy, MRI or bone scan).
* Doppler exam within the last 365 days demonstrating reflux greater than 0.5 seconds.
* The subject is diagnosed with active Charcot as described by Saunder's classification system.
* The subject manifests signs of poor nutritional status and/or albumin level \< 2.9.
* The subject has been exposed to Dermagraft and/or Oasis in the last 60 days.
* The study ulcer size is less than 0.5 cm2 or greater than 25 cm2.
* The subject has any porcine allergy or cow product allergy.
* The subject's recent (last 30 days) chemistry tests serum creatinine is 2 times above the upper limit of normal and/or LFT's 3 times above the upper limit of normal.
* Between Visit 1/Week -2 and Visit 3/Week 0 (randomization) the study ulcer has decreased in size by more than 40%, or increased in size by more than 50%.
18 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
VA Northern California Health Care System
FED
VA Office of Research and Development
FED
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Rivkah R. Isseroff, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
VA Northern California Health Care System, Mather, CA
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
VA Northern California Health Care System, Mather, CA
Sacramento, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Lev-Tov H, Li CS, Dahle S, Isseroff RR. Cellular versus acellular matrix devices in treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: study protocol for a comparative efficacy randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2013 Jan 9;14:8. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-8.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
11-04-00618
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
SURG-005-10S
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.