Aim 3, Optimizing CRC Screening in Patients With Diabetes in Safety-net Primary Care Settings

NCT ID: NCT05785780

Last Updated: 2023-10-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-11-01

Study Completion Date

2025-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This mixed methods study evaluates the effectiveness and feasibility of a multi-level (patient, team, organizations) intervention to optimize CRC screening for patients with diabetes in primary care safety-net settings.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Aim 3 is a hybrid type 2 effectiveness-implementation pilot study in six primary care safety net clinics. This single-arm study uses a pre-post design to evaluate the targeted implementation strategies impact on: (1) preliminary effectiveness and (2) implementation (i.e., feasibility and acceptability) and a mixed-method comparative case study learning evaluation for safety-net primary care adoption and implementation. Implementation strategies that will be tested were developed through a stakeholder engaged, community-based participatory implementation planning approach. This study uses a tailored combination of implementation strategies that include but are not limited to: identification of patient and practice-level barriers, patient education matierals, patient reminders provider/clinical team education, clinical champions, and audit and feedback. The impact of this evaluation will be measure using mixed methods to assess Exploration, Preparation, Implementation factors related to how organizational and contextual variables affect adoption and implementation for targeting CRC screening among patients with diabetes in safety net clinics at 12 months post intervention. Aim 3 surveys 20 clinicians and staff from 6 clinics (n=120) and conducts key-informant interviews with 8 clinic and staff members at pre- and post-implementation (who have participated in the survey; n=96) and evaluates aggregate data for 30 patients across six clinics (n=180).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Colorectal Cancer Screening Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

The study uses a pilot, pre-post, hybrid effectiveness-implementation design to compare the adapted implementation strategy to usual care on: (1) effectiveness and (2) implementation outcomes.
Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Targeted CRC Screening Toolkit

Based on national survey data and a community engagement participatory implemention planning group, a tailored combination of widely accepted implementation strategies will be adapted for targeting CRC screening for patients with diabetes. These strategies include but are not limited to: identification of patient and practice-level barriers, patient education, provider reminders, and audit and feedback.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Targeted CRC Screening Toolkit

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Strategies in the toolkit include but are not limited to: identification of patient and practice-level barriers, routine tailored patient reminders, provider reminders, \& clinic staff feedback.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Targeted CRC Screening Toolkit

Strategies in the toolkit include but are not limited to: identification of patient and practice-level barriers, routine tailored patient reminders, provider reminders, \& clinic staff feedback.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus;
* Participants not up-to-date with CRC screening based on electronic health record (e.g. FOBT/FIT in last year; flexible sigmoidoscopy within four years; or colonoscopy within nine years);
* Age-eligible for CRC screening (50-74 years of age);
* Participants in process of undergoing screening are eligible for participation if they have a FIT/FOBT incomplete test ordered for more than six months or a sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy referral not completed for greater than one year.

Exclusion Criteria

• Medical conditions not concordant with standard CRC screening intervals (e.g. prior CRC diagnosis, inflammatory bowel disease, renal failure, etc.).
Minimum Eligible Age

50 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

74 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Denalee O'Malley

Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Denalee O'Malley, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School; Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

RWJBarnabas Health - Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital

New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Denalee O'Malley, PhD

Role: CONTACT

848-319-0004

Cilgy Abraham

Role: CONTACT

732-235-5965

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Denalee O'Malley, PhD

Role: primary

Cigil Abraham

Role: backup

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

O'Malley DM, Crabtree BF, Kaloth S, Ohman-Strickland P, Ferrante J, Hudson SV, Kinney AY. Strategic use of resources to enhance colorectal cancer screening for patients with diabetes (SURE: CRC4D) in federally qualified health centers: a protocol for hybrid type ii effectiveness-implementation trial. BMC Prim Care. 2024 Jul 5;25(1):242. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02496-0.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38969987 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Pro2020002075

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

R00CA256043

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

002056

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Assessing Repeat Fit Testing for CRC
NCT03248661 COMPLETED PHASE3