Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
70 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-02-01
2026-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Exercise in Patients With Post-Concussion Symptoms
NCT04001192
Early Intervention Programme for Young Patients (Aged 15 - 30 Years) With Symptoms Following Concussion.
NCT02337101
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy-based Rehabilitation of Post-concussion Symptoms
NCT04614922
Safety and Feasibility of Early Active Rehabilitation in Children After Concussion
NCT03103529
Evaluation of a Physical Intervention for Persistent Post-Concussive Symptoms
NCT03357042
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Aims and hypotheses:
1. The aim is to describe and nuance the subjective patient perceived aspects of living with PCS including the individual experiences of symptom provocation or relieve after the initial trauma. Part one is concept developing and involves qualitative in-depth interviews of patient experiences of obstacles for living a normal life with special emphasis of intolerance to activity and exercise.
2. The aim is to assess the effects of adding a 12 week individually tailored pulse-controlled aerobe exercise program to usual care. The hypothesis is that it is possible to increase the physical capacity measured by the number of minutes of pulse-training without symptom provocation. By increasing the number of minutes the threshold value of symptom provocation will be moved upwards for a training group (TG) of patients compared to a control group (CG) who carry on in their usual activities and treatments here defined as usual care.
3. The aim is to measure quantitative components of the neurobiological aspects of PCS by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The hypothesis is that patients with PCS have more leakiness of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) compared to healthy controls. In addition, PCS patients have disturbance of brain metabolism, abnormal microstructural tissue organization and abnormal brain activity. Furthermore, that intervention will normalize these MRI metrics in a training group (TG) compared to a control group (CG).
4. The aim is to obtain qualitative components of having patients and scientists evaluating the project. The evaluation will comprise participants involved, i.e. both patients in the 2 arms and researchers and the goal of this 360-degree evaluation is to describe perceived experiences of strength, weakness, possibility and threat (SWOT) of the intervention and ultimately prevent development of PSC after a minor traumatic brain injury.
Methods - the four parts:
1. Qualitative interviews of PCS participants focusing on individual perception of own situation, detailed symptom description, hindrance of living a normal life.
2. All PSC patients continue daily living and own developed coping strategies. The intervention is an add-on. We use Short Message Service (SMS) tracking every week obtaining details of wellbeing related to living with concussion. The intervention consists of bi-weekly one hour exercise guided by physiotherapist for 12 weeks. Clinical status is performed four times- before and after 12 weeks and with two interim assessments. We use the validated Buffalo Concussion Bike Test (BCBT ). Blood pressure, pulse rate, pulse oxymetri and exercise level are registered and we use Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and BORG Ratings of Perceived Exertion (BORG RPE) scales. In addition we use the Rivermead Post Concussion Questionnaire (RPCQ ).
3. Blood brain barrier (BBB) permeability is measured by Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DCE-MRI) using a conventional MRI contrast agent. Both the leakiness (Ki) of the BBB, brain blood volume, capillary mean transit and distribution of transit times are estimated together with brain tissue perfusion (CBF). Other functional MRI measures are obtained such as the brain microstructural organization, measured by diffusion sensitive MRI and brain activity by Blood-oxygenation level dependent Imaging and brain lactate production as a measure of brain metabolism.
4. The 360-degree evaluation of the entire project is a joint, narrative process where patients, researcher and students involved sit together using a process evaluating principle. A data triangulation and a reflection of pros and cons of the project will guide the process. The evaluation is guided by an expert in process evaluation.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
Up to fifty healthy controls are included only in the MRI part. Healthy controls are recruited by advertising in public media. This part of the project is also constituted as a separate case control study comparing PCS patients and healthy controls
Seventy patients with PCS are randomized to either intervention as an add on to usual care or to control. Randomization is performed as a block-randomization with permuted block of size 2-6 generated via computer.
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Aerobe graded physical exercise intervention and usual care
Physical exercise program. The experimental programme is an add-on to usual care and consists of an aerobe graded exercise program performed twice a week for 12 weeks. Usual care includes all public treatments that each patient is assigned to at entry to REPCon. The provision of officially available treatments follow the Danish Health Care Act.
Physical exercise programme as an add-on
Consists of an individually tailored bike exercise program guided by symptoms, pulse rate and patient specific judgement of exertion monitored also by BORG RPE and VAS and progressively increasing time and level of resistance below symptom provocation
Usual care
No physical exercise program in a patient control group with PCS. This group continues with usual care, but all clinical test, interviews and MRI protocol are the same.
Control patients receiving usual care
No exercise intervention
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Physical exercise programme as an add-on
Consists of an individually tailored bike exercise program guided by symptoms, pulse rate and patient specific judgement of exertion monitored also by BORG RPE and VAS and progressively increasing time and level of resistance below symptom provocation
Control patients receiving usual care
No exercise intervention
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Longer lasting symptoms for at least 4 weeks after initial trauma
* If allocated to add-on exercise protocol participant must feel able to prioritize the intervention structure
* Communication language must be Danish
Exclusion Criteria
* Other serious brain diseases
* Severe cardiovascular diseases precluding physical activity according to protocol
18 Years
70 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University College Copenhagen
OTHER
Rigshospitalet, Denmark
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Henrik Bo Wiberg Larsson
Consultant, professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Henrik BW Larsson, Professor
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Faculty of Health and Medical Science, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University College Copenhagen
Copenhagen, Region of Greater Copenhagen, Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Repcon123
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.