Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
13 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2023-01-26
2025-12-26
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Real-Time kV Imaging vs. Real-Time 3D Patient Surface Tracking for Head & Neck Cancer
NCT01011842
Surgery With or Without Adjuvant Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy
NCT02516969
Radiation Therapy Using 3-Dimensional Treatment Planning in Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
NCT00002484
2D vs 3D Planning for High-Dose Rate (HDR) Gynecological Brachytherapy
NCT02091050
Effectiveness of Stereotactic RadioTherapy in Solid Primary Inoperable and Oligometastatic Cancer
NCT03461822
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The delineation of post-operative target volumes for localization and radiation planning can be difficult for the treating radiation oncologist due to post-operative anatomy changes from surgical manipulation of tissues, loss of normal tissue planes, and post-operative fluid collections. Post-operative radiotherapy treatment plans and volumes are usually delineated by the radiation oncologist based on review of a combination of data points including operative reports, pre-operative and post-operative diagnostic images, pathology reports, identification of surgical clips, and discussions with the treating head and neck surgeon and/or pathologists. Generally, the post-operative Clinical Target Volume for the primary tumor (CTVp) should include the primary tumor operative bed with a suitable margin to account for microscopic spread and is generally treated to 60Gy. For tumors with a positive margin, some radiation oncologists may choose to boost the area of positive margin up to 66Gy. The CTV boost (CTVb) can be difficult to visualize, and accurate understanding of the location of the positive margin can influence how small or large the boost volume is and thus dose to adjacent normal tissues, or organs at risk (OARs).
Optical 3D scanning technology has been a standard procedure quality control in industrial manufacturing for years. Due to its speed, accuracy, and relative ease of use, 3D scanning has steadily proven its utility in medicine over the past decade. The investigators have developed a protocol for optical 3D scanning of the specimen to improve communication between the OR and pathology lab (Figure 2). The resected specimen is scanned using a structured light 3D scanner. Graphics software is then used to virtually ink and annotate 3D specimen models, indicating and clearly defining the specific anatomic locations of the frozen section margins (Figure 3). In the present study, the investigators aim to use the patient-specific 3D specimen maps to improve communication between surgeons and radiation oncologists for adjuvant radiation therapy treatment planning and determine the impact of these 3D specimen maps on CTVs and OARs.
3D innovations are numerous and have become a well-established avenue of research in otolaryngology and a variety of other fields over the past decade. Optical innovations increasingly represent a new diagnostic modality that has demonstrated potential for intraoperative guidance.The team of investigators has previously published a study on the use of 3D scanning technology and virtual graphics software to bridge the gap between the operating room and pathology lab. The investigators determined this relatively simple, non-invasive technique to be a valuable communication tool for surgeons and pathologists responsible for the care of patients with head and neck cancer. However, the utilization of this technology in post-operative discussions and treatment planning with radiation oncologists has yet to be evaluated. The overarching goal of this research is to improve communication and mutual comprehension between the surgeon, pathologist, and radiation oncologist using commercially available, readily implementable 3D scanning technology and virtual graphics software thus to improve delineation of post-operative radiation therapy target volumes for patients with head and neck cancer.
The primary objective of this study is to measure the impact of patient-specific 3D specimen maps on adjuvant radiation treatment volumes and doses to critical organs. All patients will receive standard-of-care post-operative radiotherapy not impacted by the experimental 3D specimen maps. The secondary objective is to demonstrate the feasibility of incorporating 3D specimen mapping tools into post-operative communication, and to determine if utilization of the 3D specimen map improves post-operative communication between surgeons, pathologists, and radiation oncologists.
Aim #1 - Measure the impact of patient-specific 3D specimen maps on adjuvant radiation treatment fields The investigators hypothesize that the use of virtual 3D specimen mapping in radiation treatment planning will impact clinical target volumes (CTVs) to the primary tumor bed (CTVp) and/or boost (CTVb) and doses to adjacent organs at risk because of improved understanding of gross and microscopic tumor involvement.
The investigators will compare volume measurements between CTVs of two radiation treatment plans: one using standard of care planning techniques and the other with the addition of virtual 3D specimen mapping. The investigators will also compare radiotherapy doses to determine any changes to adjacent organs at risk between the two radiation treatment plans. All patients will be treated with the standard of care radiation plan that does not incorporate the 3D specimen tool.
Aim #2 - Investigate the subjective benefit of 3D specimen mapping on postoperative communication with the radiation oncologist.
The investigators hypothesize that 3D scanning and specimen mapping will benefit key stakeholders (surgeons, pathologists, radiation oncologists). Surveys will be administered at baseline and at the end of the study to assess the perceived effect of the 3D specimen tool on post-operative communication of pathology relevant to radiation field design (ie, location of positive or close margins, orientation of gross tumor in specimen, volume of resected specimen, etc).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Biopsy-confirmed mucosal head and neck cancer. All histologic malignancies will be included.
3. Patients who have completed primary tumor surgical resection in the following anatomic subsites:
1. oral cavity (oral tongue, floor of mouth, hard palate, buccal mucosa, retromolar trigone, maxillary and mandibular alveolus, lip)
2. oropharynx (soft palate, base of tongue, palatine tonsils)
3. hypopharynx (piriform sinus, post-cricoid, posterior pharyngeal wall)
4. larynx (supraglottic, glottic, subglottic);
4. Patients who have consented to 3D specimen mapping on protocol IRB # 221597 and for whom 3D specimen maps are therefore available.
5. Patients are indicated to receive curative-intent post-operative radiotherapy and intend to receive radiotherapy at Vanderbilt University Medical Center or Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center sites in Nashville, Franklin, or Lebanon
Exclusion Criteria
2. Cutaneous malignancies
3. Characteristics that make the process of informed consent questionable
4. Pregnant women
5. Patients with contraindications to radiotherapy
28 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Michael Topf
Assistant Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Vanderbilt Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
222115
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.