Evaluation of White Spot Lesion Development Using 3 Orthodontic Adhesive Systems
NCT ID: NCT05738356
Last Updated: 2024-05-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
75 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-12-10
2023-07-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
All participants will be bonded with similar fixed orthodontic appliances using each type of adhesives for the assigned group. WSLs will be monitored during the orthodontic treatment
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Incidence of White Spot Lesions Around Ceramic Brackets Compared With Metal Brackets
NCT05764187
Comparison of MI Paste Plus and Resin Infiltration in White Spot Lesions Following Orthodontic Treatment
NCT05733676
White Spot Lesions Development in Mixed Dentition Patients
NCT06798870
Evaluation of Enamel Demineralization During Clear Aligner Orthodontic Treatment
NCT04107012
Air-polishing With Erythritol During Orthodontic Tretament
NCT05989750
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Materials and Methods: Seventy five patients were randomly allocated into 3 groups (Group 1, conventional bonding system, n=25; Group 2, self-etch primer n=25; Group 3, primer mixed with the adhesive composite n=25). Quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF) was used to quantify WSL parameters. Images were captured and then analyzed before treatment; 2 months and 4 months after bond-up. Lesion area (Pixels), mean fluorescence loss (∆F) and the number of newly developed WSLs were compared within and between the 3 groups. The significance level was set at P ≤ 0.05.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Three-step adhesive
The orthodontic appliances were bonded to the patients teeth using conventional 3 step adhesive (3M™ Transbond™ XT, 3M Unitek, United States)
Adhesive bonding systems
Three different adhesive bonding systems were used; one system per group
Self-etch primer adhesive
The orthodontic appliances were bonded to the patients teeth using self-etch primer (3M™ Transbond™ Plus, 3M Unitek, United States).
Adhesive bonding systems
Three different adhesive bonding systems were used; one system per group
One-step adhesive system
The orthodontic appliances were bonded to the patients teeth using one-step adhesive system (GC Ortho Connect™, GC Orthodontics, Germany)
Adhesive bonding systems
Three different adhesive bonding systems were used; one system per group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Adhesive bonding systems
Three different adhesive bonding systems were used; one system per group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Mild-to-moderate crowding (≤5 mm)
* Optimum oral hygiene
* Maximum of 3 restored teeth
* Absence of defective enamel formation in the form of hypocalcification or hypoplasia
* No salivary gland diseases.
Exclusion Criteria
* Heavily restored teeth
* Sever crowding
* Presence of systemic disease that may affect salivary glands or the ability to brush their teeth properly.
17 Years
25 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Jordan University of Science and Technology
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Susan Al-Khateeb, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Faculty of Dentistry/Jordan University of Science and Technology
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Postgraduate Dental Teaching Clinics/JUST
Irbid, , Jordan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Gorelick L, Geiger AM, Gwinnett AJ. Incidence of white spot formation after bonding and banding. Am J Orthod. 1982 Feb;81(2):93-8. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(82)90032-x.
Mohammed RE, Abass S, Abubakr NH, Mohammed ZM. Comparing orthodontic bond failures of light-cured composite resin with chemical-cured composite resin: A 12-month clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 Aug;150(2):290-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.02.013.
BUONOCORE MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res. 1955 Dec;34(6):849-53. doi: 10.1177/00220345550340060801. No abstract available.
Frazier MC, Southard TE, Doster PM. Prevention of enamel demineralization during orthodontic treatment: an in vitro study using pit and fissure sealants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996 Nov;110(5):459-65. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(96)70050-1.
Miller CC, Burnside G, Higham SM, Flannigan NL. Quantitative Light-induced Fluorescence-Digital as an oral hygiene evaluation tool to assess plaque accumulation and enamel demineralization in orthodontics. Angle Orthod. 2016 Nov;86(6):991-997. doi: 10.2319/092415-648.1. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
Bishara SE, Ajlouni R, Laffoon JF, Warren JJ. Comparison of shear bond strength of two self-etch primer/adhesive systems. Angle Orthod. 2006 Jan;76(1):123-6. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2006)076[0123:COSBSO]2.0.CO;2.
Elkalza, A., Mostafa, D. (2018). 'Laboratory evaluation of shear bond strength of three different bonding systems for orthodontic brackets', Egyptian Orthodontic Journal, 53(June 2018), pp. 55-60. doi: 10.21608/eos.2018.77121
Choi A, Yoo KH, Yoon SY, Park BS, Kim IR, Kim YI. Anti-Microbial and Remineralizing Properties of Self-Adhesive Orthodontic Resin Containing Mesoporous Bioactive Glass. Materials (Basel). 2021 Jun 25;14(13):3550. doi: 10.3390/ma14133550.
Bishara SE, Gordan VV, VonWald L, Olson ME. Effect of an acidic primer on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998 Sep;114(3):243-7. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(98)70205-7.
Bishara SE, VonWald L, Laffoon JF, Warren JJ. Effect of a self-etch primer/adhesive on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001 Jun;119(6):621-4. doi: 10.1067/mod.2001.113269.
Montasser MA, El-Wassefy NA, Taha M. In vitro study of the potential protection of sound enamel against demineralization. Prog Orthod. 2015;16:12. doi: 10.1186/s40510-015-0080-2. Epub 2015 May 22.
Paschos E, Rosenbeck KA, Huth KC, Rudzki I, Wichelhaus A, Kunzelmann KH. Evaluation of the effect of bracket-periphery treatment on prevention of enamel demineralization by consecutive muCT scans. Clin Oral Investig. 2015 Jul;19(6):1519-26. doi: 10.1007/s00784-014-1351-x. Epub 2014 Nov 14.
SILNESS J, LOE H. PERIODONTAL DISEASE IN PREGNANCY. II. CORRELATION BETWEEN ORAL HYGIENE AND PERIODONTAL CONDTION. Acta Odontol Scand. 1964 Feb;22:121-35. doi: 10.3109/00016356408993968. No abstract available.
Loe H. The Gingival Index, the Plaque Index and the Retention Index Systems. J Periodontol. 1967 Nov-Dec;38(6):Suppl:610-6. doi: 10.1902/jop.1967.38.6.610. No abstract available.
Albhaisi Z, Al-Khateeb SN, Abu Alhaija ES. Enamel demineralization during clear aligner orthodontic treatment compared with fixed appliance therapy, evaluated with quantitative light-induced fluorescence: A randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020 May;157(5):594-601. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.01.004.
Al-Khateeb SN, Tarazi SJ, Al Maaitah EF, Al-Batayneh OB, Abu Alhaija ES. Does acid etching enhance remineralisation of arrested white spot lesions? Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2014 Dec;15(6):413-9. doi: 10.1007/s40368-014-0131-2. Epub 2014 Jun 21.
Houston WJ. The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements. Am J Orthod. 1983 May;83(5):382-90. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(83)90322-6.
Artun J, Brobakken BO. Prevalence of carious white spots after orthodontic treatment with multibonded appliances. Eur J Orthod. 1986 Nov;8(4):229-34. doi: 10.1093/ejo/8.4.229. No abstract available.
Julien KC, Buschang PH, Campbell PM. Prevalence of white spot lesion formation during orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod. 2013 Jul;83(4):641-7. doi: 10.2319/071712-584.1. Epub 2013 Jan 4.
Brown MD, Campbell PM, Schneiderman ED, Buschang PH. A practice-based evaluation of the prevalence and predisposing etiology of white spot lesions. Angle Orthod. 2016 Mar;86(2):181-6. doi: 10.2319/041515-249.1. Epub 2015 Aug 4.
Paschos E, Kleinschrodt T, Clementino-Luedemann T, Huth KC, Hickel R, Kunzelmann KH, Rudzki-Janson I. Effect of different bonding agents on prevention of enamel demineralization around orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 May;135(5):603-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.11.028.
Visel D, Jacker T, Jost-Brinkmann PG, Prager TM. Demineralization adjacent to orthodontic brackets after application of conventional and self-etching primer systems. J Orofac Orthop. 2014 Sep;75(5):358-73. doi: 10.1007/s00056-014-0233-9. Epub 2014 Aug 28.
Rasmussen MJ, Togrye C, Trojan TM, Tantbirojn D, Versluis A. Post-gel shrinkage, elastic modulus, and stress generated by orthodontic adhesives. Angle Orthod. 2020 Mar;90(2):278-284. doi: 10.2319/032719-233.1. Epub 2019 Sep 23.
Ogaard B, Rolla G, Arends J. Orthodontic appliances and enamel demineralization. Part 1. Lesion development. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988 Jul;94(1):68-73. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(88)90453-2.
Boersma JG, van der Veen MH, Lagerweij MD, Bokhout B, Prahl-Andersen B. Caries prevalence measured with QLF after treatment with fixed orthodontic appliances: influencing factors. Caries Res. 2005 Jan-Feb;39(1):41-7. doi: 10.1159/000081655.
Tufekci E, Dixon JS, Gunsolley JC, Lindauer SJ. Prevalence of white spot lesions during orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances. Angle Orthod. 2011 Mar;81(2):206-10. doi: 10.2319/051710-262.1.
Ghiz MA, Ngan P, Kao E, Martin C, Gunel E. Effects of sealant and self-etching primer on enamel decalcification. Part II: an in-vivo study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Feb;135(2):206-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.02.060.
Ogaard B. Prevalence of white spot lesions in 19-year-olds: a study on untreated and orthodontically treated persons 5 years after treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989 Nov;96(5):423-7. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(89)90327-2.
Donly KJ, Ruiz M. In vitro demineralization inhibition of enamel caries utilizing an unfilled resin. Clin Prev Dent. 1992 Nov-Dec;14(6):22-4.
Cal-Neto JP, Miguel JA. Scanning electron microscopy evaluation of the bonding mechanism of a self-etching primer on enamel. Angle Orthod. 2006 Jan;76(1):132-6. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2006)076[0132:SEMEOT]2.0.CO;2.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Randomization App
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
JUST20220118
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.