Effectiveness of the Anatomical Snuff Box Approach for Coronary Angiography
NCT ID: NCT05725616
Last Updated: 2025-11-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
326 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-07-01
2025-01-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Anatomical sNuffbox for Coronary anGiography and IntervEntions
NCT03986151
The Distal (SnUffbox) Radial artERy Access for Coronary Angiography and Interventions (SUPER-Prospective)
NCT03794687
Distal vs Proximal Radial Approach for Coronary Interventions
NCT04232488
Observational Study of Hand Function After Distal Transradial Access for Angiography
NCT03789279
Coronary Artery Stent Evaluation With 320-slice Computed Tomography - The CArS 320 Study
NCT00967876
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Historically, the femoral approach was the most common approach used in interventional cardiology. The radial approach to the forearm presents multiple advantages over the femoral route, and it became the gold standard approach to coronary angiography and intervention percutaneous coronary. Although uncommon, vascular complications related to the radial pathway exist.
This is why a more distal radial approach, above the long tendon extensor of the thumb (at the level of the anatomical snuff box) or downstream (at the back of the hand) was suggested more than 10 years ago. This pathway is now an advantageous alternative to the radial approach of first intention, both for the patient and for the practitioner.
The two procedures are common today but few studies have been developed to compare the two approaches. Therefore, the main objective of the study is to assess whether the distal radial arterial approach (snuff box or back of the hand) is not inferior to the radial arterial approach at the wrist, in the management of coronary angiography for diagnostic purposes
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Snuff box puncture
Puncture of the radial artery at of the anatomical snuff box or on the back of the hand during coronary angiography
Coronary angiography
Snuff Box Approach or radial Arterial Approach at wrist for coronary angiography.
Wrist puncture
Puncture of the radial artery at the level of the base of the wrist during coronary angiography
Coronary angiography
Snuff Box Approach or radial Arterial Approach at wrist for coronary angiography.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Coronary angiography
Snuff Box Approach or radial Arterial Approach at wrist for coronary angiography.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patient having a diagnostic coronary angiography programmed by radial route.
* Patient with a radial pulse at the anatomical snuff box and at the wrist noticeable
Exclusion Criteria
* Patient with severe arteriopathy of the supra-aortic trunks
* Patient with a history of coronary bypass surgery
* Tall patients (\>1.90m)
* Patient allergic to xylocaine
* Patient presenting a contraindication to the realization of a coronary angiography:
terminal IRC, pregnancy, severe sepsis....
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
GCS Ramsay Santé pour l'Enseignement et la Recherche
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Cardiologie Tonkin
Villeurbanne, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2022-A01928-35
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.