Pilot Study on Device-assisted Mobilisation of Critically Ill Patients
NCT ID: NCT05716451
Last Updated: 2025-12-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-04-27
2025-11-11
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Secondary hypotheses are:
1. The intervention will relieve the burden of the health care staff in the unit
2. The intervention will positively influence the functional outcome of critically ill patients
3. The intervention is perceived as positive by the patients
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Comparative Study of Support Devices for Ventilator-Assisted ICU Patients
NCT05996055
Effect of Sit-to-Stand Intervention in the Intensive Care Unit Survivors
NCT04640441
PICU Up!: A Pilot Stepped-wedge Trial of a Multicomponent Early Mobility Intervention for Critically Ill Children
NCT03860168
Strengths and Weaknesses of Physiotherapy in the Daily Work of an Intensive Care Unit
NCT06407076
Technology-Assisted Early Mobilization Program Among Patients in the Intensive Care Units
NCT06700694
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Various studies have shown that patients can benefit from a high level of mobilization. For example, Scheffenbichler et al. showed that a high dose of mobilization was associated with increased independence of patients after discharge. The level of mobilization showed positive effects not only in this study, but also in Paton and colleagues. They were able to show that achieving a higher level of mobility (according to the Intensive Care Mobility Scale) was associated with improved outcome at six months. They found that achieving a higher level of mobilization positively affected the health status of patients, whereas increasing the number of mobilizations did not.
With device-assisted mobilization, patients could be mobilized to standing position early and more frequently. The aim of this pilot study is to test whether mobilization of critically ill patients with ventilatory support using device-assisted mobilization leads to increased mobilization to standing (IMS 4) or beyond.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention Group
Mobilization incl. support by the Liana. In the intervention group, Liana is used to train trunk stability in a sitting position. If this is successful, the patient is trained to stand. Mobilization to higher levels is performed according to clinical standards.
Device-assisted mobilisation with the sit/stand stabilizer Liana
Non-invasive device-assisted mobilisation with LIANA
Control Group
Standard of Care without the use of the Liana. In the control group the therapy is carried out according to the ward standard without using the Liana.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Device-assisted mobilisation with the sit/stand stabilizer Liana
Non-invasive device-assisted mobilisation with LIANA
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age ≥ 18 years
* Current length of intensive care stay \< 48 h
Exclusion Criteria
* Suspected 6-month mortality \> 75%.
* Increased intracranial pressure
* Critically ill after cardiopulmonary resuscitation
* Critically ill with primary neuromuscular disease or motor neuron disease
* One or more amputated extremities
* Patients, within 2h after surgery
* Unstable fractures
* Severe traumatic brain injury (e.g., brain and skull injuries)
* Circulatory instability with norepinephrine \> 0.3 µg/kg/min
* Patients for whom there is an indication for deep sedation (RASS -5)
* Language barrier
* Fitting of legs into leg trays is not possible due to e.g. patient weight
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Charite University, Berlin, Germany
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Stefan J Schaller
Deputy Clinical Director
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Stefan J Schaller, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Charite University, Berlin, Germany
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Charité - Univiversitätsmedizin Berlin
Berlin, State of Berlin, Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
LIANA-I
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.