Biosimilars of Rituximab in ANCA-associated Vasculitis Compared to the Originator
NCT ID: NCT05716334
Last Updated: 2025-12-02
Study Results
Results pending
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
Recruitment Status
COMPLETED
Total Enrollment
201 participants
Study Classification
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Start Date
2021-06-15
Study Completion Date
2025-09-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The goal of this multicentre observational study is to compare the safety and effectiveness of rituximab biosimilars to the originator in Canadian patients with Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis (GPA) and Microscopic Polyangiitis (MPA), two main forms of ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV).
The main questions it aims to answer are:
* Is there a difference in vasculitis control between originator and biosimilar rituximab?
* Is there a difference in adverse effects between originator and biosimilar rituximab?
* In the Canadian healthcare context, are wait times to receive approval (financial coverage) for rituximab shorter for biosimilars compared to originators?
Investigators will perform study assessments (including recording disease activity, damage, and adverse events) at the time of participants' usual clinical care visits, at regular intervals for 2 years after starting rituximab (for induction or maintenance treatment) or switching from an originator to a biosimilar as part of their usual care.
Researchers will compare outcomes among participants who have received rituximab originators (from 2018 onwards) or biosimilars as part of their usual care, to see if there are differences in relapses, remission rates, damage, serious infections, serious adverse events, and treatment approval wait times.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
* Is there a difference in vasculitis control between originator and biosimilar rituximab?
* Is there a difference in adverse effects between originator and biosimilar rituximab?
* In the Canadian healthcare context, are wait times to receive approval (financial coverage) for rituximab shorter for biosimilars compared to originators?
Investigators will perform study assessments (including recording disease activity, damage, and adverse events) at the time of participants' usual clinical care visits, at regular intervals for 2 years after starting rituximab (for induction or maintenance treatment) or switching from an originator to a biosimilar as part of their usual care.
Researchers will compare outcomes among participants who have received rituximab originators (from 2018 onwards) or biosimilars as part of their usual care, to see if there are differences in relapses, remission rates, damage, serious infections, serious adverse events, and treatment approval wait times.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Efficacy Study of Two Treatments in the Remission of Vasculitis
NCT00748644
Wegener Granulomatosis
Microscopic Polyangiitis
COMPLETED
PHASE3
Comparison Study of Two Rituximab Regimens in the Remission of ANCA Associated Vasculitis
NCT01731561
Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis
Microscopic Polyangiitis
Renal Limited Forms
COMPLETED
PHASE3
PR3-AAV Resilient Remission or PRRR
NCT05376319
Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis
Microscopic Polyangiitis
ANCA Associated Vasculitis
TERMINATED
PHASE2
Biologics in Refractory Vasculitis: A Trial of Biologic Therapy for Refractory Primary Non-ANCA Associated Vasculitis
NCT05168475
Giant Cell Arteritis
Takayasu Arteritis
Cogan Syndrome
+6 more
TERMINATED
PHASE2
Pharmacokinetic Study of Rituximab Induction Regimen in ANCA-associated Vasculitis
NCT02474888
Granulomatosis, Wegener's
Microscopic Polyangiitis
TERMINATED
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Background. Rituximab (RTX), a B-cell depleting therapy, has comparable efficacy to cyclophosphamide for induction of remission in severe granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) and microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) and superior efficacy to azathioprine for maintenance of remission (1,2). RTX is now a first-line therapy for remission induction and maintenance of remission in severe GPA and MPA (3).
Biosimilar RTX agents are molecules that are highly similar in structure to the 'originator' RTX that was initially studied and approved for the treatment of AAV. Among patients with rheumatoid arthritis, randomized controlled trials have demonstrated comparable efficacy and safety between originator and RTX biosimilars (4,5). Extension studies found that switching from originator to biosimilar does not alter disease activity, immunogenicity, or safety (6,7). Conversely, data on the outcomes of RTX biosimilars in AAV are limited. A retrospective study from Korea included 26 patients (\~80% MPA) who received either Truxima (n=15) or Mabthera/Rituxan (n=11) for second-line induction after failure or intolerance to cyclosphosphamide (CYC) (8). There were no obvious deviations in relapse, mortality, end-stage kidney disease, or cardiovascular outcomes compared to other studies with similar populations. A second study was a retrospective cohort study of 77 patients with GPA in India who received RTX biosimilars not available in Canada (Reditux, Rituxipca, Mabtas) for induction, maintenance, or both (9). Outcomes were comparable to those observed in randomized controlled trials of the originator drug.
Despite this scarce amount of data, many Canadian provincial and private funders are mandating the use of biosimilar agents (e.g. Truxima, Ruxience, Riximyo) for induction and maintenance of GPA and MPA, in place of the originator drug (Rituxan). There is a need for longitudinal prospective studies to determine comparative safety and effectiveness of RTX biosimilar agents in Canadian patients with GPA or MPA.
The COVID-19 pandemic has raised concerns for patients and providers about the safety of immunosuppression with RTX. Cohort studies of patients with rheumatic disease have reported an association between RTX and the risk of severe COVID-19 and death from COVID-19 (10-12). Rituximab may also reduce the immunogenicity, and thus the effectiveness, of COVID-19 vaccination, as has been observed for other vaccines (13).
Objectives. The overarching objective of this study is to compare the real-world safety and effectiveness of originator and biosimilar RTX for the treatment of GPA/MPA.
Specific objectives:
To determine, in patients with GPA/MPA receiving biosimilar or originator RTX for remission induction and/or maintenance:
1. Frequency of clinical remission at 6 and 24 months
2. Frequency and time to relapse and major relapse at 6 and 24 months
3. Frequency and time to serious adverse events (SAEs) at 6 and 24 months
4. Frequency and time to serious infection (SI) at 6 and 24 months
5. Frequency and time to discontinuation of RTX due to adverse events or relapse
6. Disease damage at 6 and 24 months
7. Wait time from RTX application to approval and first infusion
8. Frequency of COVID-19 infections and hospitalizations
Participant recruitment:
Potential prospective participants meeting inclusion criteria will be identified by clinicians providing care to patients with GPA or MPA (i.e., the local study investigators) when patients attend their routine clinical care visits (in-person or telemedicine). The local study investigators (i.e. the clinician providing care to the patient) will then describe the study to potential participants, and if interested, will be given the informed consent form to read (in paper or electronic format, per the potential participant's wishes). The potential participant will have the opportunity to ask any questions to the clinician/investigator or research coordinator, who will be the person obtaining consent. The potential participant will also have the option of reading the consent form at a later date, and will be given the contact information of the study coordinator should he/she wish to notify the investigator and/or coordinator of his/her intent to participate at a later date.
Informed consent Informed consent will be obtained either electronically (via the secure REDCap platform) or using paper consent forms during usual care visits. Patients' participation is entirely voluntary. Prospective participants will provide informed consent to participate in the study and may discontinue their participation at any time.
This study will be conducted in accord with the Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans (2018), as well as in respect of the requirements set out in the applicable standard operation procedures of the Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre Research Institute and of the McGill University Health Centre Research Ethics Board. The McGill University Health Centre Research Ethics Board has reviewed this study and is responsible for monitoring it at all participating institutions in the health and social services network in Québec. Each participating center outside the Réseau de la Santé et des Services Sociaux has approval from their local Research Ethics Board.
Data Collection
Participants will be followed for 24 months.
The following will be collected at enrolment/baseline:
* Age, sex, race/ethnicity, province, education, diagnosis (GPA or MPA), date of diagnosis, ANCA status at diagnosis, number of prior relapses
* Organ involvement at last relapse or at diagnosis
* Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (v3, BVAS) and Vasculitis Damage Index (VDI) at time of RTX treatment
* Prior RTX and cyclophosphamide doses received in the last 5 years, dates
* Type of RTX product received
* Payor (i.e., government drug plan or private insurance or participant out-of-pocket, assessed based on clinical records of drug applications and approvals located in the chart and/or participant report)
* Date of most recent RTX application and date of first infusion
* Current therapies
* Glucocorticoids with current dose
* Other immunosuppressants
* Pneumocystis/infection prophylaxis
* If switching from RTX originator to biosimilar (or vice versa), reason for switch
* COVID-19 infection and vaccination with dates if applicable
Subsequent study assessments Data collection/study visits will occur at Months 3 (+/-1) (RTX induction recipients only) , 6(+/-3), 12(+/-3), and 24(+/-6), coinciding with usual practice clinical care visits.
At these visits, the following information will be recorded, based on physician clinical assessments (participant history, physical exam), and medical chart reviews (outcome definitions are described in Outcomes):
* Interval RTX infusions: doses, dates, RTX product, payor (based on clinical records of drug applications and approvals and/or participant report)
* If RTX infusions were stopped/delayed, reason and date
* Current (ongoing) therapies
* Current GC dose
* Other immunosuppressants
* pneumocystis/infection prophylaxis
* BVAS
* VDI
* Interval disease relapses with date
* Interval serious infections (SIs) with date
* Interval Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) with date
* Symptomatic late onset neutropenia with date
* Symptomatic hypogammaglobulinemia with date
* Interval COVID-19 infection and vaccination with dates
* Date of death and cause of death if applicable
Data will be collected and entered into secure electronic data capture (REDCap) and/or through paper Case Report Forms (for centers without access to REDCap), and subsequently entered centrally in the main study REDCap database.
As this study will be conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic, virtual visits instead of in-person visits will be accepted as they represent the frequent usual care at the time of this pandemic.
Study size rational:
Planned enrollment will be 120 RTX biosimilar users and 120 RTX originator users, either prospectively or from existing registries with retrospective collection, over the course of 18 months, across 8 different participating centres. This study size would provide 80% power (at a significance level of 0.05) to show a 2-fold increase in the percentage with relapses in the biosimilar group, assuming 15% have a relapse at 24 months in the originator group.
Significance Currently very limited data exist on comparative safety or effectiveness of RTX biosimilars versus the originator drug in ANCA-associated vasculitis. This study will provide real-world data on patients receiving either RTX originator or biosimilar for induction or maintenance of GPA or MPA to permit these comparisons.
Funding The study is funded by the Canadian Network for Advanced Interdisciplinary Methods for comparative effectiveness research (CAN-AIM). CAN-AIM has a mandate to compare safety and effectiveness of originator and biosimilar drugs across diseases and disciplines. The study is also funded by the Canadian Initiative for Outcomes in Rheumatology cAre (CIORA), which ultimately aims to improve the care of Canadians diagnosed with a rheumatic disease.
Biosimilar RTX agents are molecules that are highly similar in structure to the 'originator' RTX that was initially studied and approved for the treatment of AAV. Among patients with rheumatoid arthritis, randomized controlled trials have demonstrated comparable efficacy and safety between originator and RTX biosimilars (4,5). Extension studies found that switching from originator to biosimilar does not alter disease activity, immunogenicity, or safety (6,7). Conversely, data on the outcomes of RTX biosimilars in AAV are limited. A retrospective study from Korea included 26 patients (\~80% MPA) who received either Truxima (n=15) or Mabthera/Rituxan (n=11) for second-line induction after failure or intolerance to cyclosphosphamide (CYC) (8). There were no obvious deviations in relapse, mortality, end-stage kidney disease, or cardiovascular outcomes compared to other studies with similar populations. A second study was a retrospective cohort study of 77 patients with GPA in India who received RTX biosimilars not available in Canada (Reditux, Rituxipca, Mabtas) for induction, maintenance, or both (9). Outcomes were comparable to those observed in randomized controlled trials of the originator drug.
Despite this scarce amount of data, many Canadian provincial and private funders are mandating the use of biosimilar agents (e.g. Truxima, Ruxience, Riximyo) for induction and maintenance of GPA and MPA, in place of the originator drug (Rituxan). There is a need for longitudinal prospective studies to determine comparative safety and effectiveness of RTX biosimilar agents in Canadian patients with GPA or MPA.
The COVID-19 pandemic has raised concerns for patients and providers about the safety of immunosuppression with RTX. Cohort studies of patients with rheumatic disease have reported an association between RTX and the risk of severe COVID-19 and death from COVID-19 (10-12). Rituximab may also reduce the immunogenicity, and thus the effectiveness, of COVID-19 vaccination, as has been observed for other vaccines (13).
Objectives. The overarching objective of this study is to compare the real-world safety and effectiveness of originator and biosimilar RTX for the treatment of GPA/MPA.
Specific objectives:
To determine, in patients with GPA/MPA receiving biosimilar or originator RTX for remission induction and/or maintenance:
1. Frequency of clinical remission at 6 and 24 months
2. Frequency and time to relapse and major relapse at 6 and 24 months
3. Frequency and time to serious adverse events (SAEs) at 6 and 24 months
4. Frequency and time to serious infection (SI) at 6 and 24 months
5. Frequency and time to discontinuation of RTX due to adverse events or relapse
6. Disease damage at 6 and 24 months
7. Wait time from RTX application to approval and first infusion
8. Frequency of COVID-19 infections and hospitalizations
Participant recruitment:
Potential prospective participants meeting inclusion criteria will be identified by clinicians providing care to patients with GPA or MPA (i.e., the local study investigators) when patients attend their routine clinical care visits (in-person or telemedicine). The local study investigators (i.e. the clinician providing care to the patient) will then describe the study to potential participants, and if interested, will be given the informed consent form to read (in paper or electronic format, per the potential participant's wishes). The potential participant will have the opportunity to ask any questions to the clinician/investigator or research coordinator, who will be the person obtaining consent. The potential participant will also have the option of reading the consent form at a later date, and will be given the contact information of the study coordinator should he/she wish to notify the investigator and/or coordinator of his/her intent to participate at a later date.
Informed consent Informed consent will be obtained either electronically (via the secure REDCap platform) or using paper consent forms during usual care visits. Patients' participation is entirely voluntary. Prospective participants will provide informed consent to participate in the study and may discontinue their participation at any time.
This study will be conducted in accord with the Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans (2018), as well as in respect of the requirements set out in the applicable standard operation procedures of the Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre Research Institute and of the McGill University Health Centre Research Ethics Board. The McGill University Health Centre Research Ethics Board has reviewed this study and is responsible for monitoring it at all participating institutions in the health and social services network in Québec. Each participating center outside the Réseau de la Santé et des Services Sociaux has approval from their local Research Ethics Board.
Data Collection
Participants will be followed for 24 months.
The following will be collected at enrolment/baseline:
* Age, sex, race/ethnicity, province, education, diagnosis (GPA or MPA), date of diagnosis, ANCA status at diagnosis, number of prior relapses
* Organ involvement at last relapse or at diagnosis
* Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (v3, BVAS) and Vasculitis Damage Index (VDI) at time of RTX treatment
* Prior RTX and cyclophosphamide doses received in the last 5 years, dates
* Type of RTX product received
* Payor (i.e., government drug plan or private insurance or participant out-of-pocket, assessed based on clinical records of drug applications and approvals located in the chart and/or participant report)
* Date of most recent RTX application and date of first infusion
* Current therapies
* Glucocorticoids with current dose
* Other immunosuppressants
* Pneumocystis/infection prophylaxis
* If switching from RTX originator to biosimilar (or vice versa), reason for switch
* COVID-19 infection and vaccination with dates if applicable
Subsequent study assessments Data collection/study visits will occur at Months 3 (+/-1) (RTX induction recipients only) , 6(+/-3), 12(+/-3), and 24(+/-6), coinciding with usual practice clinical care visits.
At these visits, the following information will be recorded, based on physician clinical assessments (participant history, physical exam), and medical chart reviews (outcome definitions are described in Outcomes):
* Interval RTX infusions: doses, dates, RTX product, payor (based on clinical records of drug applications and approvals and/or participant report)
* If RTX infusions were stopped/delayed, reason and date
* Current (ongoing) therapies
* Current GC dose
* Other immunosuppressants
* pneumocystis/infection prophylaxis
* BVAS
* VDI
* Interval disease relapses with date
* Interval serious infections (SIs) with date
* Interval Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) with date
* Symptomatic late onset neutropenia with date
* Symptomatic hypogammaglobulinemia with date
* Interval COVID-19 infection and vaccination with dates
* Date of death and cause of death if applicable
Data will be collected and entered into secure electronic data capture (REDCap) and/or through paper Case Report Forms (for centers without access to REDCap), and subsequently entered centrally in the main study REDCap database.
As this study will be conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic, virtual visits instead of in-person visits will be accepted as they represent the frequent usual care at the time of this pandemic.
Study size rational:
Planned enrollment will be 120 RTX biosimilar users and 120 RTX originator users, either prospectively or from existing registries with retrospective collection, over the course of 18 months, across 8 different participating centres. This study size would provide 80% power (at a significance level of 0.05) to show a 2-fold increase in the percentage with relapses in the biosimilar group, assuming 15% have a relapse at 24 months in the originator group.
Significance Currently very limited data exist on comparative safety or effectiveness of RTX biosimilars versus the originator drug in ANCA-associated vasculitis. This study will provide real-world data on patients receiving either RTX originator or biosimilar for induction or maintenance of GPA or MPA to permit these comparisons.
Funding The study is funded by the Canadian Network for Advanced Interdisciplinary Methods for comparative effectiveness research (CAN-AIM). CAN-AIM has a mandate to compare safety and effectiveness of originator and biosimilar drugs across diseases and disciplines. The study is also funded by the Canadian Initiative for Outcomes in Rheumatology cAre (CIORA), which ultimately aims to improve the care of Canadians diagnosed with a rheumatic disease.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
ANCA-associated Vasculitis
Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis
Microscopic Polyangiitis
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
Observational Model Type
COHORT
Study Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Rituximab originator recipients
Patients aged ≥18 with a diagnosis of GPA or MPA treated with rituximab (RTX) originator for induction and/or maintenance.
No interventions assigned to this group
Rituximab biosimilar recipients
Patients aged ≥18 with a diagnosis of GPA or MPA treated with RTX biosimilars (e.g. Ruxience, Truxima, Riximyo, etc) for induction and/or maintenance.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Prospective cohort:
Initiated within the last 6 months:
1. RTX biosimilar or originator for induction OR
2. RTX biosimilar or originator for maintenance (with or without prior RTX induction) OR
3. Switched from RTX originator maintenance to biosimilar maintenance (4-12 months between infusions)
Historical cohort:
Followed in a prospective longitudinal cohort study/registry within the CanVasc network, and initiated the following after January 1, 2018 but \>6 months prior to study enrollment
1. RTX biosimilar or originator for induction OR
2. RTX biosimilar or originator for maintenance (with or without RTX induction)
Initiated within the last 6 months:
1. RTX biosimilar or originator for induction OR
2. RTX biosimilar or originator for maintenance (with or without prior RTX induction) OR
3. Switched from RTX originator maintenance to biosimilar maintenance (4-12 months between infusions)
Historical cohort:
Followed in a prospective longitudinal cohort study/registry within the CanVasc network, and initiated the following after January 1, 2018 but \>6 months prior to study enrollment
1. RTX biosimilar or originator for induction OR
2. RTX biosimilar or originator for maintenance (with or without RTX induction)
Exclusion Criteria
* patients without a diagnosis of GPA or MPA
* patients who did not/are not receiving RTX induction or maintenance therapy
* patients who initiated most recent RTX treatment course prior to Jan 1, 2018
* patients receiving RTX for reasons other than GPA or MPA induction or maintenance (e.g. other concurrent disease)
* unable to provide informed consent
* patients who did not/are not receiving RTX induction or maintenance therapy
* patients who initiated most recent RTX treatment course prior to Jan 1, 2018
* patients receiving RTX for reasons other than GPA or MPA induction or maintenance (e.g. other concurrent disease)
* unable to provide informed consent
Minimum Eligible Age
18 Years
Eligible Sex
ALL
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sinai Health System
OTHER
Sponsor Role
collaborator
London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's
OTHER
Sponsor Role
collaborator
Centre Integre Universitaire de Sante et Services Sociaux du Nord de l'ile de Montreal
OTHER
Sponsor Role
collaborator
St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton
OTHER
Sponsor Role
collaborator
University of Calgary
OTHER
Sponsor Role
collaborator
University of British Columbia
OTHER
Sponsor Role
collaborator
University of Alberta
OTHER
Sponsor Role
collaborator
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
OTHER
Sponsor Role
collaborator
CAnadian Network for Advanced Interdisciplinary Methods for comparative effectiveness research
UNKNOWN
Sponsor Role
collaborator
Canadian Initiative for Outcomes in Rheumatology Care
OTHER
Sponsor Role
collaborator
McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre
OTHER
Sponsor Role
lead
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Arielle Mendel
Assistant Professor, Division of Rheumatology; Clinician Investigator
Responsibility Role
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Arielle Mendel, MD MSc
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
McGill University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Calgary
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Site Status
University of Alberta
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Site Status
University of British Columbia (Vancouver Coastal Health Authority)
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Site Status
St Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton (McMaster University)
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Site Status
Lawson Research Institute (Western University)
London, Ontario, Canada
Site Status
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (Ottawa University)
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Site Status
Sinai Health System (University of Toronto)
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Site Status
McGill University (Montreal General Hospital)
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Site Status
Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Nord-de-l'île-de-Montréal (CIUSSS NÎM) / Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Site Status
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Canada
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Stone JH, Merkel PA, Spiera R, Seo P, Langford CA, Hoffman GS, Kallenberg CG, St Clair EW, Turkiewicz A, Tchao NK, Webber L, Ding L, Sejismundo LP, Mieras K, Weitzenkamp D, Ikle D, Seyfert-Margolis V, Mueller M, Brunetta P, Allen NB, Fervenza FC, Geetha D, Keogh KA, Kissin EY, Monach PA, Peikert T, Stegeman C, Ytterberg SR, Specks U; RAVE-ITN Research Group. Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis. N Engl J Med. 2010 Jul 15;363(3):221-32. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0909905.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Guillevin L, Pagnoux C, Karras A, Khouatra C, Aumaitre O, Cohen P, Maurier F, Decaux O, Ninet J, Gobert P, Quemeneur T, Blanchard-Delaunay C, Godmer P, Puechal X, Carron PL, Hatron PY, Limal N, Hamidou M, Ducret M, Daugas E, Papo T, Bonnotte B, Mahr A, Ravaud P, Mouthon L; French Vasculitis Study Group. Rituximab versus azathioprine for maintenance in ANCA-associated vasculitis. N Engl J Med. 2014 Nov 6;371(19):1771-80. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1404231.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Mendel A, Ennis D, Go E, Bakowsky V, Baldwin C, Benseler SM, Cabral DA, Carette S, Clements-Baker M, Clifford AH, Cohen Tervaert JW, Cox G, Dehghan N, Dipchand C, Dhindsa N, Famorca L, Fifi-Mah A, Garner S, Girard LP, Lessard C, Liang P, Noone D, Makhzoum JP, Milman N, Pineau CA, Reich HN, Rheaume M, Robinson DB, Rumsey DG, Towheed TE, Trudeau J, Twilt M, Yacyshyn E, Yeung RSM, Barra LB, Khalidi N, Pagnoux C. CanVasc Consensus Recommendations for the Management of Antineutrophil Cytoplasm Antibody-associated Vasculitis: 2020 Update. J Rheumatol. 2021 Apr;48(4):555-566. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.200721. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Smolen JS, Cohen SB, Tony HP, Scheinberg M, Kivitz A, Balanescu A, Gomez-Reino J, Cen L, Zhu P, Shisha T. A randomised, double-blind trial to demonstrate bioequivalence of GP2013 and reference rituximab combined with methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Sep;76(9):1598-1602. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-211281. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Park W, Bozic-Majstorovic L, Milakovic D, Berrocal Kasay A, El-Khouri EC, Irazoque-Palazuelos F, Molina FFC, Shesternya P, Miranda P, Medina-Rodriguez FG, Wiland P, Jeka S, Chavez-Corrales J, Garmish O, Linde T, Rekalov D, Hrycaj P, Krause A, Fomina N, Piura O, Abello-Banfi M, Suh CH, Shim SC, Lee SJ, Lee SY, Kim SH, Yoo DH. Comparison of biosimilar CT-P10 and innovator rituximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized controlled Phase 3 trial. MAbs. 2018 Aug/Sep;10(6):934-943. doi: 10.1080/19420862.2018.1487912. Epub 2018 Jul 16.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Cohen SB, Burgos-Vargas R, Emery P, Jin B, Cronenberger C, Vazquez-Abad MD. Extension Study of PF-05280586, a Potential Rituximab Biosimilar, Versus Rituximab in Subjects With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2018 Nov;70(11):1598-1606. doi: 10.1002/acr.23586.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Park W, Suh CH, Shim SC, Molina FFC, Jeka S, Medina-Rodriguez FG, Hrycaj P, Wiland P, Lee EY, Shesternya P, Kovalenko V, Myasoutova L, Stanislav M, Radominski S, Lim MJ, Choe JY, Lee SJ, Lee SY, Kim SH, Yoo DH. Efficacy and Safety of Switching from Innovator Rituximab to Biosimilar CT-P10 Compared with Continued Treatment with CT-P10: Results of a 56-Week Open-Label Study in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis. BioDrugs. 2017 Aug;31(4):369-377. doi: 10.1007/s40259-017-0233-6.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Kwon HC, Kim MK, Song JJ, Park YB, Lee SW. Rituximab Biosimilar Prevents Poor Outcomes of Microscopic Polyangiitis and Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis as Effectively as Rituximab Originator. Yonsei Med J. 2020 Aug;61(8):712-719. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.8.712.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Mittal S, Naidu GSRSNK, Jha S, Rathi M, Nada R, Minz RW, Sharma K, Dhir V, Jain S, Sharma A. Experience with similar biologic rituximab in 77 patients of granulomatosis with polyangiitis-a real-life experience. Clin Rheumatol. 2021 Feb;40(2):645-651. doi: 10.1007/s10067-020-05261-7. Epub 2020 Jul 12.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Loarce-Martos J, Garcia-Fernandez A, Lopez-Gutierrez F, Garcia-Garcia V, Calvo-Sanz L, Del Bosque-Granero I, Teran-Tinedo MA, Boteanu A, Bachiller-Corral J, Vazquez-Diaz M. High rates of severe disease and death due to SARS-CoV-2 infection in rheumatic disease patients treated with rituximab: a descriptive study. Rheumatol Int. 2020 Dec;40(12):2015-2021. doi: 10.1007/s00296-020-04699-x. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
FAI2R /SFR/SNFMI/SOFREMIP/CRI/IMIDIATE consortium and contributors. Severity of COVID-19 and survival in patients with rheumatic and inflammatory diseases: data from the French RMD COVID-19 cohort of 694 patients. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021 Apr;80(4):527-538. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-218310. Epub 2020 Dec 2.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Strangfeld A, Schafer M, Gianfrancesco MA, Lawson-Tovey S, Liew JW, Ljung L, Mateus EF, Richez C, Santos MJ, Schmajuk G, Scire CA, Sirotich E, Sparks JA, Sufka P, Thomas T, Trupin L, Wallace ZS, Al-Adely S, Bachiller-Corral J, Bhana S, Cacoub P, Carmona L, Costello R, Costello W, Gossec L, Grainger R, Hachulla E, Hasseli R, Hausmann JS, Hyrich KL, Izadi Z, Jacobsohn L, Katz P, Kearsley-Fleet L, Robinson PC, Yazdany J, Machado PM; COVID-19 Global Rheumatology Alliance. Factors associated with COVID-19-related death in people with rheumatic diseases: results from the COVID-19 Global Rheumatology Alliance physician-reported registry. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021 Jul;80(7):930-942. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-219498. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Rondaan C, Furer V, Heijstek MW, Agmon-Levin N, Bijl M, Breedveld FC, D'Amelio R, Dougados M, Kapetanovic MC, van Laar JM, Ladefoged de Thurah A, Landewe R, Molto A, Muller-Ladner U, Schreiber K, Smolar L, Walker J, Warnatz K, Wulffraat NM, van Assen S, Elkayam O. Efficacy, immunogenicity and safety of vaccination in adult patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases: a systematic literature review for the 2019 update of EULAR recommendations. RMD Open. 2019 Sep 9;5(2):e001035. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2019-001035. eCollection 2019.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MP-37-2021-7545
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.
Rituximab and Belimumab Combination Therapy in PR3 Vasculitis
NCT03967925
UNKNOWN
PHASE2
Belimumab in Remission of VASculitis
NCT01663623
COMPLETED
PHASE3
Maintenance of ANCA Vasculitis Remission by Intermittent Rituximab Dosing
NCT02749292
TERMINATED
PHASE4
A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of CCX168 in Subjects With ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
NCT01363388
COMPLETED
PHASE2
Rituximab for the Treatment of Wegener's Granulomatosis and Microscopic Polyangiitis
NCT00104299
COMPLETED
PHASE2/PHASE3
Phase 2 Study Evaluating Rapcabtagene Autoleucel in Participants With Severe Active GPA or MPA
NCT06868290
RECRUITING
PHASE2
Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab in the Treatment of Good Prognosis Microscopic Polyangiitis
NCT03920722
UNKNOWN
PHASE3
Rituximab Plus Corticosteroids in Non-infectious Active Mixed Cryoglobulinemia Vasculitis
NCT02556866
TERMINATED
PHASE2
Rituximab in Eosinophilic Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis
NCT02807103
COMPLETED
PHASE3
Evaluate the Remission MAINtenance Using Extended Administration of Prednisone in Systemic Anti-neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibodies (ANCA)-Associated Vasculitis.
NCT03290456
RECRUITING
NA
Obinutuzumab for Remission Induction in Patients With Relapsing PR3-ANCA Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis
NCT06940661
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
PHASE2
BIANCA-SC: A Study of the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Blisibimod in Addition to Methotrexate During Induction of Remission in Subjects With ANCA-Associated Small Vessel Vasculitis
NCT01598857
WITHDRAWN
PHASE2
Iptacopan in Patients With ANCA Associated Vasculitis
NCT06388941
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
PHASE2
Defining Immune Tolerance in ANCA-associated Vasculitis (AAV)
NCT01934504
TERMINATED
PRO Development for ANCA Associated Vasculitis
NCT01729624
UNKNOWN
Biocollection of Patients With ANCA Associated Vasculitis
NCT05364892
RECRUITING
NA
Efficacy and Safety for Rituximab Combined With Telitacicept in the Treatment of ANCA-associated Vasculitis (TTCAAVREM)
NCT05962840
RECRUITING
PHASE4
Safe Effective Therapy With Low-Dose Glucocorticoid in ANCA-Associated Vasculitis (SAFE-LOW)
NCT06983821
RECRUITING
PHASE3
BRIGHT-SC: Blisibimod Response in IgA Nephropathy Following At-Home Treatment by Subcutaneous Administration
NCT02062684
COMPLETED
PHASE2/PHASE3
Pilot Study of Short-Course Glucocorticoids and Rituximab for Treatment of ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
NCT02169219
COMPLETED
PHASE4
Exploring Durable Remission With Rituximab in Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody(ANCA)-Associated Vasculitis
NCT03942887
RECRUITING
PHASE3
Evaluation of Glucocorticoids Plus Rituximab in Patients with Newly-Diagnosed or Relapsing IgA Vasculitis
NCT05329090
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
PHASE3
Efficacy and Safety of Belimumab in the Treatment of Non-infectious Active Cryoglobulinemia Vasculitis Compared to Placebo. TRIBECA STUDY (Treatment nd BElimumab in Cryoglobulinemia Associated Vasculitis)
NCT04629144
RECRUITING
PHASE2
Upadacitinib for Refractory Behcet's Syndrome
NCT07080346
COMPLETED
PHASE2
Low-dose Glucocorticoid Vasculitis Induction Study
NCT02198248
UNKNOWN
PHASE4