Predicting Response to PD-1 Checkpoint Blockade Using Deep Learning Analysis of Imaging and Clinical Data

NCT ID: NCT05711914

Last Updated: 2023-02-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

300 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-01-31

Study Completion Date

2022-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Immunotherapy has transformed cancer treatment with the PD-1 class of checkpoint inhibitors - pembrolizumab and nivolumab -- demonstrating durable responses in Stage IV metastatic tumors such as non-small cell lung cancer and melanoma. Despite these numerous successes, PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint blockade therapies do have a number of shortcomings.

Many approaches to predict response to PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint therapy have been investigated with limited success. Recent efforts exploring the utility of quantitative imaging biomarkers to predict response to PD-\[L\]1 immunotherapy have shown promise. The purpose of this retrospective multicenter study is to develop a multi-omic classifier to predict response to PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint blockade for mutation negative (EGFR, ALK and ROS1) NSCLC

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Recent Phase III studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of atezolizumab (PD-L1) in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer \[3\] and small cell lung cancer, while the standard of care for Stage III non-small cell lung cancer has changed with positive results of the PACIFIC Phase III study, where durvalumab (PD-L1) administered after chemoradiation showed a significant increase in overall survival.

Low response rates, generally in the 15% to 20% range in most diseases when used as a single agent, high therapy cost globally ($150,000 or more per year in the U.S) and serious immune-mediated adverse events, particularly when PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors are combined with the CTLA-4 inhibitors (ipilimumab). Unpredictable and low patient response rates coupled with high drugs costs and serious toxicities can significantly burden healthcare systems, third-party payers and patients. Clearly, diagnostic tools to stratify patients according to response likelihood are necessary as PD-\[L\]1 checkpoint inhibitors continue to gain adoption.

The standard-of-care biomarker is an immunohistochemistry (IHC) test that measures levels of the PD-L1 protein expressed in tumor samples. Tumor mutational burden, presence of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes and inflammatory cytokines are being explored in multiple clinical trials involving PD-(L)1 often in combination with additional immuno-oncology (IO) therapies In such an approach, a non-invasive imaging scan can provide insight and information on the patient's entire tumor burden rather than a sample of a subset of lesions (as provided by biopsy or serum-based assays). When diagnostic images that depict all treatable lesions are further analyzed with computational techniques such as machine-learning and artificial intelligence, resulting in the identification of relevant imaging biomarkers, an accurate overall assessment of patient response to PD-\[L\]1 therapy may be attainable.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

OTHER

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Exclusion Criteria

\-
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

100 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

MEDEXPRIM

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

GRATICULE

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Jean-Paul BEREGI

Nîmes, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Local2021/JPB-01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.