Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agents for Anemia Management in Egyptian Hemodialysis Patients
NCT ID: NCT05699109
Last Updated: 2023-01-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
127 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-01-01
2021-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
* What are the effectiveness and safety of long- acting versus short-acting erythropoietin-stimulating agents in Egyptian hemodialysis patients?
* What is the cost-effectiveness of long- acting versus short-acting erythropoietin-stimulating agents in Egyptian hemodialysis patients?
Participants will be divided into 2 groups; epoetin alfa (short-acting ESA), Eprex group, and darbepoetin alfa (long-acting ESA), Aranesp group for six month study period.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of Pentoxifylline on Anemia in Hemodialysis Patients
NCT05708248
" Evaluation of Erythropoietin Therapy in Patients With End-Stage Kidney Disease on Regular Hemodialysis: Hemoglobin Outcomes, and Metabolic Syndrome as a Risk Factor for Erythropoietin Resistance "
NCT06983756
Comparison Among Erythropoietin Stimulating Agents
NCT02049346
Study of Rule-Based Algorithms in Anemia Management in Prevalent Hemodialysis Patients and Its Relation to Patients' Outcomes
NCT06996717
Study of the Efficacy of Darbepoetin Alfa in the Treatment of Renal Anemia
NCT00563446
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
It has been demonstrated that using erythropoietin-stimulating drugs (ESAs) in treating renal anemia increases survival, lowers cardiovascular morbidity, and improves the quality of life.
Epoetin alfa (EPO), an ESA with a shorter half-life, and darbepoetin alfa (DPO), are the two ESAs used in hemodialysis centers the most frequently in Egypt (longer half life ) Epoetin alfa is dosed one to three times per week, whereas darbepoetin alfa is dosed once per week or every two weeks.
Compared to epoetins, darbepoetin alfa's extended dose interval may benefit patients and their medical professionals.
Despite the fact that ESAs save CKD patients from needing blood transfusions, clinical trials, meta-analyses, and mortality hazards with ESAs targeting high hemoglobin levels have been shown. A higher ESA dose may be linked to cardiovascular problems and all-cause mortality independent of hemoglobin level.
Darbepoetin alfa has a lower risk of side effects because it only requires 35% of the dosage of epoetin alfa to attain the same target hemoglobin level. Darbepoetin alfa also has an advantage over epoetin alfa in that it makes it easier for the body to mobilize iron into the bone marrow to cause successful erythropoiesis, which may shield the body from any potential negative effects from having too much iron stored there. Despite this, the medication that Egyptian hemodialysis centers use the most is (EPO). This study compares (DPO) and (EPO) to determine which should be utilized based on efficacy, safety, and cost.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Aranesp group
Aranesp group: patients received darbepoetin alpha prefilled syringe subcutaneously once weekly or biweekly
No interventions assigned to this group
Eprex group
Eprex group: patients received epoetin alpha prefilled syringe subcutaneously one to three times per week
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age must be 18 or older
* Patients who had been receiving a single form of ESA treatment for at least three months before the study's launch.
Exclusion Criteria
* failed to adhere to dialysis therapy, as shown by missing more than two appointments each month.
* have COVID-19 infection.
* had cancer.
* underwent a kidney transplant
* were pregnant or nursing mothers
* were not followed up for the full six-month research period.
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Helwan University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Salma Magdy Abdelfattah
Teaching Assistant
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Abdel-Hameed Ibrahim Ebid, Professor
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Faculty of Pharmacy, Helwan University
Amira Mohamed El-Sawy, Lecturer
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Faculty of Pharmacy, Helwan University
Hazem Ayoub, Lecturer
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Faculty of Medicine, Al Azhar University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
the Memorial Souad Kafafi University Hospital
Giza, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Bernieh B, Abouchacra S, Boobes Y, Al Hakim MR, Nagelkerke N, Chaaban A, Ahmed M, Hussain Q, Jack HE, Abayechi F, Khan I, Gebran N. Comparison between short- and long-acting erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in hemodialysis patients: target hemoglobin, variability, and outcome. Int Urol Nephrol. 2014 Feb;46(2):453-9. doi: 10.1007/s11255-013-0640-7. Epub 2014 Jan 22.
Biggar P, Ketteler M, Hennemann H, Domling R. Switch of ESA therapy from darbepoetin-alpha to epoetin-beta in hemodialysis patients: a single-center experience. Clin Nephrol. 2008 Mar;69(3):185-92. doi: 10.5414/cnp69185.
Sinha SD, Bandi VK, Bheemareddy BR, Thakur P, Chary S, Mehta K, Pinnamareddy VR, Pandey R, Sreepada S, Durugkar S. Efficacy, tolerability and safety of darbepoetin alfa injection for the treatment of anemia associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD) undergoing dialysis: a randomized, phase-III trial. BMC Nephrol. 2019 Mar 13;20(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12882-019-1209-1.
Chen N, Xing C, Niu J, Liu B, Fu J, Zhao J, Ni Z, Wang M, Liu W, Zhao J, Zhong L, Wu X, Li W, Chen Y, Shi W, Chen J, Yin A, Fu P, Wang R, Jiang G, Hou F, Ding G, Chen J, Xu G, Kondo Y, Su Y, Mei C. Darbepoetin alfa injection versus epoetin alfa injection for treating anemia of Chinese hemodialysis patients with chronic kidney failure: A randomized, open-label, parallel-group, non-inferiority Phase III trail. Chronic Dis Transl Med. 2022 Mar 29;8(1):59-70. doi: 10.1002/cdt3.13. eCollection 2022 Mar.
Soliman AE, Magdy S, Ayoub HS, Ebid AI. Short versus long-acting erythropoiesis-stimulating agents for anemia management in Egyptian hemodialysis patients. Qatar Med J. 2024 Mar 11;2024(1):16. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2024.16. eCollection 2024.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Anemia in CKD
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.