A Comparison of Three Surgical Approaches to Zygomaticomaxillary Fractures
NCT ID: NCT05695872
Last Updated: 2023-05-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
24 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-08-26
2023-02-05
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Modified Anatomical Mesh In The Management Of Orbito-Zygomatico-Maxillary Complex Fractures
NCT06958510
Sagittal Split Plate Versus Two Miniplates in the Treatment of Mandibular Angle Fractures
NCT07103590
One Point Versus Two Point Fixation of Tripodal Zygomatic Fractures
NCT04214405
A New Surgical Approach to Treat Medial or Low Condylar Fractures
NCT01851031
Treatment of Unilateral Complicated Zygomatic Complex Fractures Using Computer-Assisted Navigation System
NCT03075384
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Group A: subtarsal approach group. Group B: conventional transconjuctival approach group. Group C: Y- modification of the transconjuctival approach group.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
subtarsal approach
subtarsal approach
surgical approach
conventional transconjunctival approach
conventional transconjunctival approach
surgical approach
transconjunctival approach with Y- modification
transconjunctival approach with Y- modification
surgical approach
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
subtarsal approach
surgical approach
conventional transconjunctival approach
surgical approach
transconjunctival approach with Y- modification
surgical approach
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Adult patients aged between 20 and 50 years with no gender predilection.
Exclusion Criteria
* Infection at the fracture line.
* Comminuted fracture with bone loss.
* Acute and chronic conjunctival diseases.
20 Years
50 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Alexandria
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Lydia Nabil
Associate Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University
Alexandria, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Melek LN, Noureldin MG. Zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures: finding the least complicated surgical approach (A Randomized Clinical Trial). BMC Oral Health. 2023 Aug 4;23(1):539. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03249-8.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
UAlexandriaMaxFacSurg
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.