Attitudes, Knowledge, Self-efficacy, and Behaviors of Nurses in Nutritional Care for Older People
NCT ID: NCT05691595
Last Updated: 2025-10-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
179 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-06-01
2025-10-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Considering that self-efficacy has been previously theorized in several populations as the mediator of the relationship from knowledge and attitudes to specific behaviors, the investigators hypothesized that knowledge and attitudes in the specific area of nursing nutritional care have moderately positive effects on nursing caring behaviors in nutritional care only through the mediation of nursing self-efficacy.
The study design is a multi-phase, descriptive observational cross-sectional, multicentric study, collecting data using a web-survey.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of Effectiveness of Nutritional Practical Counseling for Elderly Patients at Risk of Malnutrition on Nutritional Status at Home
NCT02796521
Knowledge of Nutritional Concerns in Physically Active Females
NCT05589077
Nutritional Education for Dependant Patients
NCT01360775
Implementation of Nutritional Guidelines and Effects in Nursing Home Residents
NCT01861366
Systematic Oral Nutritional Support in Hospitalized, Moderately Hypophagic Patients At Nutritional Risk
NCT02763904
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Malnutrition in older people is still an unsolved issue, affecting from 3.1% among outpatients to 29.4% in rehabilitation/sub-acute settings. To date, empirical evidence shows that malnutrition in older people cause a higher risk of disability and loss of autonomy and increase morbidity and mortality. For this reason, prevention of malnutrition should be a priority of health professionals in the care and cure of older patients, and nurses are in a strategic position to prevent malnutrition in older people because they are the only health professionals who look after the patients 24/24 and 7/7. However, several studies report that the quality of nutritional care is often under the standard in clinical settings, underlining that the major barriers to nutritional care, from the nurses' point of view, were: loneliness in nutritional care, a need for competence in nutritional care, low flexibility in foodservice practices, system failure in nutritional care and the neglect of nutritional care.
In this regard, it is possible to hypothesize several key factors underpinning the nursing nutritional competencies that could influence the quality of nutritional care delivery, such as knowledge, attitudes, and self-efficacy. Indeed, numerous authors have described that a lack of knowledge about the key elements of good nutritional care is fundamental to delivering care with high quality, as lead them to underestimate the consequences of its inadequacy. Literature explained that a lack of knowledge of the important concepts of malnutrition could lead to an underestimation of the phenomenon and to behaviors that do not prevent the onset of malnutrition. Therefore, it is crucial to measure the level of the health professional's knowledge on these matters to implement targeted training, although recent literature reported an improvement in this regard. A further factor that could influence the quality of care is the attitude of nurses toward nutritional care. Indeed, previous evidence identified that the proper screening for malnourished patients and implementing corrective strategies with the multidisciplinary team are essential aspects of the nursing competencies . Unfortunately, literature reports that nurses often have a negative attitude toward nutritional care because they often perceive nutritional care as a secondary responsibility. These negative attitudes can cause underestimating malnutrition, which can remain undetected, increasing the risk of negative health-related outcomes in older adults.
Finally, self-efficacy, defined as the beliefs that people have in their ability to successfully complete complex tasks, can be considered a proxy for nursing job performance, and its perceived level by nurses could influence the quality of nutritional care. In fact, according to Bandura, self-efficacy is a predictor of performance, which can be modified through appropriate educational and motivational interventions, mediating between the level of both knowledge and attitudes with action. In this regard, Dellafiore et al. developed a self-efficacy scale for nurses to assess the nutritional care of older adults to make it possible to measure nurses' self-efficacy in nutritional care (as a proxy assessment of nursing competencies in nutritional care) and, consequently, evaluate its improvement by specific interventions.
Data collection and sample size
The collected data will be sent into an electronic data collector, whose output will be saved as an eCRF file in REDCap. The start and end of the data collection are scheduled for June 2022 and June 2023, respectively.
Thus far, it is known that the correlation between knowledge and attitudes regarding nutritional nursing care is moderately positive (r = 0.410; p\<0.001), while the correlations between knowledge, attitude with self-efficacy, and behaviors are mainly undescribed. As per our hypothesis, knowledge and attitudes with self-efficacy and behaviors might show moderate positive correlations. Thus, the investigators hypothesize that the weakest correlation (out of the total of six in the posited model) could be approximately r = 0.25. According to Hulley et al. (2013), a total sample size required to determine whether a correlation coefficient differs from zero has to meet the following criteria: N = \[(Zα+Zβ)/C\]2 +3; where N is the sample size, α = 0.05/6 (0.0083) considering a Bonferroni correction for performing six tests of hypotheses, and therefore Zα = 2.40, β = 10% and then Zβ = 1.28, C = 0.5 \* ln\[(1 + r)/(1 - r)\] = 0.5\*ln\[(1 + 0.25)/(1 - 0.25)\] = 0.5 \* ln\[1.67\] = 0.5 \* 0.51 = 0.26. Consequently, \[(2.40+1.28)/0.26\]2 +3 = 203. Therefore, 203 nurses should be enrolled to determine whether the correlation coefficients differ from zero.
The data collection will be performed with the following questionnaires in a self-reporting format via web-survey:
* Socio-demographic variables, such as sex (male, female), age (years), and marital status (married, unmarried, other)
* Professional characteristics are: postgraduate education (yes, no), clinical setting (chronic care settings, acute care settings), work experience (years), nutritional care to older adults (routine care, infrequent care)
* Staff Attitudes to Nutritional Nursing Care Geriatric scale (SANN-G scale)
* Knowledge of Malnutrition- Geriatric (KoM-G)
* Self-efficacy Scale for Nursing Nutrition Care (SE-NNC)
Statistical analysis
All the data will be checked using the frequency distribution to assess possible missing, errors or outliers. Descriptive statistics will be used to describe the sample characteristics, where categorical data will be presented as frequencies, and continuous data will be presented as means ± standard deviation (M±SD) for normally distributed variables and as the median and interquartile range (25°-75° percentile) for continues data non-normally distributed. The study of skewness will be used to preliminary assess the normal distribution of the variables, followed by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Missing data will be managed using a pairwise approach. The sample characteristics will be compared between and within groups and using Pearson's χ2 test for dichotomous variables in the univariate analysis or using The Student's t-test (or one-way ANOVA when appropriate) for parametric values.
For the preliminary Aim, the Bartlett's test will be used to assess the correlation matrix's factorability and the Kaiser-Mayer-Olkin (KMO) index will be performed before running an exploratory factor analysis (EFA). EFAs will be performed using robust maximum likelihood parameter estimates (MLR) in the case of non-normally distributed items or robust maximum likelihood (ML) in the case of normally-distributed items. A geomin oblique rotation will be used for facilitating the interpretation of the relationships between latent factors and observed variables. The selection of the number of factors to be extracted will be guided by analyzing the eigenvalues, the scree test, the interpretation of the relationships between latent factors and observed variables, and the theoretical domains conceptualized in the items' generation phase.
Structural equation modelings will be run according to the posited hypothesis to investigate the main Aim. The models will be evaluated considering the interpretation of the following indices of fit: the Satorra-Bentler χ2; the comparative fit index (CFI) (values \>0.90 indicated an acceptable fit); the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) (values \<0.06 indicated an acceptable fit); the weighted root mean square residual (WRMR; values 1.0 indicated an acceptable fit).
All data will be analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Science version 22 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA) and MPLus 8.1, and the level of significance will be set at 0.05 and two-tailed.
Expected results
This study will provide useful information to firstly understand and determine the relationship between attitudes, knowledge, self-efficacy, and behaviors of nurses in nutritional care for older people. So far, this topic has been under-investigated, and this study will provide helpful information to answer a gap in knowledge.
Data management
All data collected anonymously through the web-survey will be processed following current legislation (European Regulation 2016/679, Legislative Decree 101/2018) and the GCP, respecting the participating subjects' privacy. The data will be automatically entered into an online binder after each patient completes the questionnaire. Once the collection phase is complete, the binder will be extrapolated into an Excel sheet for analysis purposes. The Excel output will also be deposited in REDCap.
Ethical considerations
Prior to the compilation of the web-survey, the informed consent will be obtained online on the same page. The study can be described as anonymous because it is impossible to link any particular sample to a person based on the obtained data. It is not considered necessary to employ a separate written informed permission for this sort of study, according to current legislation (European Regulation 2016/679, Legislative Decree 101/2018), because it would cease to exist the study's confidentiality. On the other hand, it is thought to prioritize properly informing subjects with a clear and understandable presentation webpage that explains the survey's purpose before they complete the online questionnaire.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Online survey data collection
The data will be collected via a web-survey created with the SurveyMonkey® software. The web-survey will be distributed among nurses at IRCCS Policlinico San Donato (San Donato Milanese, Italy) and ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda (Milan, Italy).
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* aged ≥ 18 years;
* full-time work contract;
* work experience: more than six months of experience in the same ward;
* work experience in nutritional care for older people (people aged 60 years and older).
Exclusion Criteria
* not compiling the informed consent (via the same web-survey);
* working in critical care settings (e.g., intensive care units, emergency demertments);
* working in outpatient settings.
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda
OTHER
IRCCS Policlinico S. Donato
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Gianluca Conte
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Rosario Caruso
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
IRCCS Policlinico S. Donato
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
IRCCS Policlinico San Donato
San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy
ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda
Milan, , Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ayre, C., & Scally, A. J. (2014). Critical values for Lawshe's content validity ratio: revisiting the original methods of calculation. Measurement and evaluation in counseling and development, 47(1), 79-86.
Bachrach-Lindstrom M, Jensen S, Lundin R, Christensson L. Attitudes of nursing staff working with older people towards nutritional nursing care. J Clin Nurs. 2007 Nov;16(11):2007-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01868.x. Epub 2007 Apr 5.
Bandura A. Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. Self-efficacy beliefs Adolesc. 2006. doi:10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Bassola B, Tommasi V, Bonetti L, Bauer S, Lusignani M. Nurses' knowledge about malnutrition in older people: A multicenter cross-sectional study. Nutrition. 2020 Oct;78:110947. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2020.110947. Epub 2020 Jul 18.
Bauer S, Halfens RJ, Lohrmann C. Knowledge and Attitudes of Nursing Staff Towards Malnutrition Care in Nursing Homes: A Multicentre Cross-Sectional Study. J Nutr Health Aging. 2015 Aug;19(7):734-40. doi: 10.1007/s12603-015-0535-7.
Bjerrum M, Tewes M, Pedersen P. Nurses' self-reported knowledge about and attitude to nutrition -- before and after a training programme. Scand J Caring Sci. 2012 Mar;26(1):81-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2011.00906.x. Epub 2011 Jul 1.
Boaz M, Rychani L, Barami K, Houri Z, Yosef R, Siag A, Berlovitz Y, Leibovitz E. Nurses and nutrition: a survey of knowledge and attitudes regarding nutrition assessment and care of hospitalized elderly patients. J Contin Educ Nurs. 2013 Aug;44(8):357-64. doi: 10.3928/00220124-20130603-89. Epub 2013 Jun 10.
Bollo M, Terzoni S, Ferrara P, Destrebecq A, Bonetti L. Nursing students' attitudes towards nutritional care of older people: A multicentre cross-sectional survey incorporating a pre post design. Nurse Educ Today. 2019 Jul;78:19-24. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2019.03.016. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
Bonetti L, Bagnasco A, Aleo G, Sasso L. 'The transit of the food trolley'- malnutrition in older people and nurses' perception of the problem. Scand J Caring Sci. 2013 Jun;27(2):440-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2012.01043.x. Epub 2012 Jul 30.
Bonetti L, Terzoni S, Lusignani M, Negri M, Froldi M, Destrebecq A. Prevalence of malnutrition among older people in medical and surgical wards in hospital and quality of nutritional care: A multicenter, cross-sectional study. J Clin Nurs. 2017 Dec;26(23-24):5082-5092. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14051. Epub 2017 Sep 29.
Casanova N, Bagnasco A, Bonetti L, Sasso L. [Nurses' attitudes towards nutritional care and malnutrition in hospitalised older people: A Survey in the Liguria Region]. Prof Inferm. 2015 Oct-Dec;68(4):219-26. doi: 10.7429/pi.2015.684219. Italian.
Cereda E, Pedrolli C, Klersy C, Bonardi C, Quarleri L, Cappello S, Turri A, Rondanelli M, Caccialanza R. Nutritional status in older persons according to healthcare setting: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence data using MNA(R). Clin Nutr. 2016 Dec;35(6):1282-1290. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2016.03.008. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
Dellafiore F, Caruso R, Arrigoni C, Magon A, Baroni I, Alotto G, Quaccini C, Bianchi M, Bonetti L. The development of a self-efficacy scale for nurses to assess the nutritional care of older adults: A multi-phase study. Clin Nutr. 2021 Mar;40(3):1260-1267. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2020.08.008. Epub 2020 Aug 14.
DiMaria-Ghalili RA, Mirtallo JM, Tobin BW, Hark L, Van Horn L, Palmer CA. Challenges and opportunities for nutrition education and training in the health care professions: intraprofessional and interprofessional call to action. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014 May;99(5 Suppl):1184S-93S. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.113.073536. Epub 2014 Mar 19.
Donini LM, Stephan BCM, Rosano A, Molfino A, Poggiogalle E, Lenzi A, Siervo M, Muscaritoli M. What Are the Risk Factors for Malnutrition in Older-Aged Institutionalized Adults? Nutrients. 2020 Sep 18;12(9):2857. doi: 10.3390/nu12092857.
Edwards D, Carrier J, Hopkinson J. Assistance at mealtimes in hospital settings and rehabilitation units for patients (>65years) from the perspective of patients, families and healthcare professionals: A mixed methods systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2017 Apr;69:100-118. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.01.013. Epub 2017 Jan 30.
Eide HD, Halvorsen K, Almendingen K. Barriers to nutritional care for the undernourished hospitalised elderly: perspectives of nurses. J Clin Nurs. 2015 Mar;24(5-6):696-706. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12562. Epub 2014 Mar 20.
Fletcher A, Carey E. Knowledge, attitudes and practices in the provision of nutritional care. Br J Nurs. 2011 May 27-Jun 9;20(10):615-6, 618-20. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2011.20.10.615.
Green SM, James EP. Barriers and facilitators to undertaking nutritional screening of patients: a systematic review. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2013 Jun;26(3):211-21. doi: 10.1111/jhn.12011. Epub 2013 Jan 19.
Hestevik CH, Heyerdahl E, Lysne Garaas B, Sellevold GS, Molin M. Improving Documentation of Nutritional Care in A Nursing Home: An Evaluation of A Participatory Action Research Project. Geriatrics (Basel). 2019 Mar 20;4(1):29. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics4010029.
Hulley SB, Cummings SR, Browner WS, Grady D, Newman TB. Designing clinical research: an epidemiologic approach. 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013. Appendix 6C, page 79
Marinho R, Pessoa A, Lopes M, Rosinhas J, Pinho J, Silveira J, Amado A, Silva S, Oliveira BMPM, Marinho A, Jager-Wittenaar H. High prevalence of malnutrition in Internal Medicine wards - a multicentre ANUMEDI study. Eur J Intern Med. 2020 Jun;76:82-88. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2020.02.031. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
Plaza CM, Draugalis JR, Retterer J, Herrier RN. Curricular evaluation using self-efficacy measurements. Am J Pharm Educ. 2002;66(1):51-54
Relph WL. Addressing the nutritional needs of older patients. Nurs Older People. 2016 Apr;28(3):16-9. doi: 10.7748/nop.28.3.16.s22.
Rentero Redondo L, Iniesta Navalon C, Gascon Canovas JJ, Tomas Jimenez C, Sanchez Alvarez C. [MALNUTRITION IN THE ELDERLY PATIENT TO HOSPITAL ADMISSION, AN OLD PROBLEM UNSOLVED]. Nutr Hosp. 2015 Nov 1;32(5):2169-77. doi: 10.3305/nh.2015.32.5.9712. Spanish.
Vanderwee K, Clays E, Bocquaert I, Verhaeghe S, Lardennois M, Gobert M, Defloor T. Malnutrition and nutritional care practices in hospital wards for older people. J Adv Nurs. 2011 Apr;67(4):736-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05531.x. Epub 2010 Dec 12.
Vanderwee K, Clays E, Bocquaert I, Gobert M, Folens B, Defloor T. Malnutrition and associated factors in elderly hospital patients: a Belgian cross-sectional, multi-centre study. Clin Nutr. 2010 Aug;29(4):469-76. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2009.12.013. Epub 2010 Jan 25.
Willis H. Causes, assessment and treatment of malnutrition in older people. Nurs Older People. 2017 Feb 28;29(2):20-25. doi: 10.7748/nop.2017.e883.
Yordy BM, Roberts S, Taggart HM. Quality Improvement in Clinical Nutrition: Screening and Mealtime Protection for the Hospitalized Patient. Clin Nurse Spec. 2017 May/Jun;31(3):149-156. doi: 10.1097/NUR.0000000000000292.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
74/INT/2022
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.