Effect of Non-nutritive Sucking on Transition to Oral Feeding in Infants With Asphyxia

NCT ID: NCT05687708

Last Updated: 2023-10-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-11-01

Study Completion Date

2023-07-25

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The transition period to full oral feeding in infants with perinatal asphyxia is important in predicting long-term outcomes. The transition to independent oral feeding is accepted as a discharge criterion by the American Academy of Pediatrics, and the long transition from tube feeding to oral feeding prolongs the discharge process. Prolonged transition to oral feeding increases maternal stress as it delays gastrointestinal problems, mother-infant interaction and attachment, as well as increasing health expenditures. Due to long-term feeding tube use; Infection, leakage, delay in wound healing, trauma caused by repeated placement, as well as oral reluctance are observed. In asphyxia infants, in whom oral-motor dysfunction is common, the transition to oral feeding takes a long time and tube feeding support is required. The effect of hypothermia, which is a general therapeutic intervention that reduces the risk of mortality and morbidity in infants with asphyxia, on oral feeding has been previously studied and shown to have a positive effect. They also found that MR imaging in infants with asphyxia and the need for gastrostomy and tube feeding in those with brainstem involvement were associated.

Various interventions that affect the transition to oral nutrition positively and shorten the discharge time are included in the literature. Stimulation of non-nutritive sucking (NNS) is the most frequently preferred method among these interventions. It has been shown in studies that there are no short-term negative effects of NNS stimulation with the help of a pacifier or gloved finger, and some clinical benefits such as better bottle feeding performance, acceleration of discharge and transition to oral feeding.

The effect of the NNS stimulation method, which has been shown to be effective in preterm infants with large-scale randomized controlled studies, is not known exactly.

The aim of this study is to examine the effect of NNS stimulation applied to oral feeding, feeding skills, weight gain and discharge in asphyxia infants receiving hypothermia treatment.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Perinatal asphyxia is the interruption of fetal blood flow or gas exchange during the perinatal period. Injury to the brain as a result of systemic hypoxia caused by disruption of gas exchange and slowing of cerebral blood flow is called hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE). Perinatal asphyxia may be maternally related or may occur as a result of conditions related to the placenta and the newborn itself. It may have etiologies such as maternal diseases such as diabetes, hypertension or preeclampsia, uterine rupture, cord compression, congenital airway anomalies of the newborn, neurological disorder, and severe cardiopulmonary disease. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) report, perinatal asphyxia causes 4 million newborn deaths every year and constitutes 23% of total neonatal deaths. Asphyxia, which has effects such as death, seizures and HIE in the short term, has effects such as motor disorders such as cerebral palsy, sensory disorders such as vision and hearing loss, cognitive, neurodevelopmental, behavioral and emotional disorders in the long term. Malnutrition is a problem that can occur both in the short and long term. In the short term, it may have consequences such as orogastric or nasogastric tube feeding due to sucking and/or swallowing dysfunction, prolonged feeding times in the long term, frequent coughing, aspiration pneumonia and gastrostomy. The transition period to full oral feeding in infants with perinatal asphyxia is important in predicting long-term outcomes. The transition to independent oral feeding is accepted as a discharge criterion by the American Academy of Pediatrics, and the long transition from tube feeding to oral feeding prolongs the discharge process. Prolonged transition to oral feeding increases maternal stress as it delays gastrointestinal problems, mother-infant interaction and attachment, as well as increasing health expenditures. Due to long-term feeding tube use; Infection, leakage, delay in wound healing, trauma caused by repeated placement, as well as oral reluctance are observed. In asphyxia infants, in whom oral-motor dysfunction is common, the transition to oral feeding takes a long time and tube feeding support is required. The effect of hypothermia, which is a general therapeutic intervention that reduces the risk of mortality and morbidity in infants with asphyxia, on oral feeding has been previously studied and shown to have a positive effect. They also found that MR imaging in infants with asphyxia and the need for gastrostomy and tube feeding in those with brainstem involvement were associated.

Various interventions that affect the transition to oral nutrition positively and shorten the discharge time are included in the literature. Stimulation of non-nutritive sucking (NNS) is the most frequently preferred method among these interventions. It has been shown in studies that there are no short-term negative effects of NNS stimulation with the help of a pacifier or gloved finger, and some clinical benefits such as better bottle feeding performance, acceleration of discharge and transition to oral feeding.

The effect of the NNS stimulation method, which has been shown to be effective in preterm infants with large-scale randomized controlled studies, is not known exactly. The NNS stimulation method applied in a newborn with severe asphyxia with medical complications was investigated in a case study and it was pointed out that it could have positive results, but more research should be done in this patient group.

The aim of this study is to examine the effect of NNS stimulation applied to oral feeding, feeding skills, weight gain and discharge in asphyxia infants receiving hypothermia treatment.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Swallowing Disorder Perinatal Asphyxia Feeding; Difficult, Newborn Feeding Disorder of Infancy or Early Childhood Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy Speech Therapy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Non-Nutritive Sucking

Non-Nutritive Sucking

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Non-Nutritive Sucking

Intervention Type OTHER

NNS is stimulated by giving stimulus into the baby's mouth with the help of a finger wearing gloves.

Control

routine treatment

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Non-Nutritive Sucking

NNS is stimulated by giving stimulus into the baby's mouth with the help of a finger wearing gloves.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* to be diagnosed with asphyxia,
* to have received hypothermia treatment,
* to have started enteral nutrition,
* to have physiological stability to tolerate NNS stimulation.

Exclusion Criteria

* Having a craniofacial anomaly,
* having a congenital anomaly,
* being referred to another center/hospital during treatment.
Minimum Eligible Age

34 Months

Maximum Eligible Age

41 Months

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Medipol University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Hilal Berber Çiftci

Doctoral Student, Speech and Language Therapist

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Seyhun Topbas

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Medipol University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Medipol University

Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Harding C, Frank L, Dungu C, Colton N. The use of nonnutritive sucking to facilitate oral feeding in a term infant: a single case study. J Pediatr Nurs. 2012 Dec;27(6):700-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2012.01.006. Epub 2012 Feb 22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22366642 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MedipolDKT

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Feeding Maturity in Preterm Infants
NCT07273266 RECRUITING NA