Feasibility of Preoperative Inspiratory Muscle Training for Patients With Peritoneal Metastases
NCT ID: NCT05665257
Last Updated: 2022-12-27
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-11-30
2020-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The main questions it aimed to answer was how feasible the intervention is regarding process and scientific feasibility as defined by Thabane et al 2010.
Participants in the intervention group were using a handheld device to increase their inspiratory muscle strength prior to surgery and researchers compared this group to a control group who were offered a sham treatment.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Mini-PEP
Participants in the control arm were instructed to use a handheld PEP-device traditionally used to facilitate deep breathing. The PEP-device does not provide any inspiratory resistance and therefore, it was considered a sham treatment. The control group were also instructed to use the device twice a day for at least two weeks.
Mini-PEP
Inspiratory muscle training
Participants in the intervention group were using a handheld device, Powerbreathe K3, aiming at increasing inspiratory muscle strength by applying an inspiratory resistance. They were instructed to use it twice a day for at least 14 days. Starting load was based on the baseline assessment of the participant's inspiratory muscle strength and increased during the intervention period.
Inspiratory muscle training
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Inspiratory muscle training
Mini-PEP
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Inability to speak and understand Swedish
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Uppsala University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mikael Andersson, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Department of Medical Sciences, Respiratory, Allergy and Sleep Research, Uppsala University
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Ethical approval no 2016/338
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id