Implementation of Population Cancer Genetic Services in Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHC)
NCT ID: NCT05664867
Last Updated: 2026-01-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
80 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-08-01
2027-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Aim 1 is to compare the effectiveness of MGT and SOC+ interventions on the uptake of genetic testing among patients receiving primary care in an urban federally qualified health center (FQHC) system using a randomized trial study design. The hypothesis is that the uptake of testing will be higher among patients receiving services through the MGT compared with the SOC+ model.
Aim 2 is to evaluate the implementation outcomes (acceptability, feasibility and sustainability) and the barriers and facilitators of cancer genetic service delivery approaches within primary care at FQHCs via qualitative interviews with patients, primary care providers and clinic staff, and organizational leaders, guided by the Explore, Prepare, Implement, Sustain (EPIS) implementation framework.
The study will take place at four community health clinics that are part of a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) network in Chicago. Each clinic will use one of two ways of providing cancer genetic services: an enhanced standard of care model that includes patient navigation support (SOC+), or a mainstream genetic testing model (MGT) in which primary care providers offer testing directly. Information such as patients' demographic characteristics, referrals for genetic counseling, completion of genetic testing, and how long it takes to complete testing will be collected from clinic records. Patients, healthcare providers, and clinic staff will also be invited to take part in interviews to share their experiences and perspectives on how each model worked in practice.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Clinical Outcomes for Offering Genetic Testing in a Tiered Approach
NCT04902144
An Intervention to Increase Genetic Testing in Families Who May Share a Gene Mutation Related to Cancer Risk and An Intervention to Help Patients and Their Primary Care Providers Stay Up-to-date About Uncertain Genetic Test Results
NCT05420064
Methods for Increasing Genetic Testing Uptake in Michigan
NCT05162846
eHealth Delivery Alternative for Cancer Genetic Testing for Hereditary Cancer
NCT05427240
Evaluating an Alternative Clinical Genetics Cancer Care Delivery Model: A Pilot Study of Patient Outcomes
NCT02917798
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Multiple social determinants of health (SDoH) contribute to limited access to genetic services among underserved populations. At the clinic level, many community health centers have limited capacity to systematically identify at-risk patients, employ few or no genetic specialists, and must rely on external systems for genetic counseling and testing. At the provider level, primary care clinicians often report low confidence and limited training in cancer genetics, while genetic specialists may have limited presence or integration in these care settings. At the patient level, structural, economic, and cultural barriers continue to restrict engagement in genetic testing and counseling.
This project will evaluate and compare two models of cancer genetic service delivery in primary care to improve equitable access among patients served by Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs). The enhanced standard of care model (SOC+) uses universal electronic hereditary cancer risk assessment (HCRA) to identify eligible patients, combined with patient navigation to address individual barriers such as financial concerns and literacy needs. The mainstream genetic testing model (MGT) embeds genetic testing directly into primary care visits, allowing patients to receive education, counseling, and test ordering from their primary care provider without referral to specialty care.
Aim 1: Compare the effectiveness of MGT and SOC+ on uptake of genetic testing among minority patients receiving primary care within an urban FQHC system.
Aim 2: Evaluate implementation outcomes (acceptability, feasibility, and sustainability) and identify barriers and facilitators to cancer genetic service delivery in primary care using qualitative interviews with patients, providers, and clinic staff, guided by the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) framework.
A quasi-experimental design will be used across four FQHC clinics, with each clinic assigned to one of the two models, two SOC+ and two MGT. Demographic and service utilization data, including referrals, testing completion, and time-to-test intervals, will be collected from the electronic medical record. Semi-structured interviews with patients, providers, and staff will further explore experiences and perceptions of each model.
This work will generate actionable evidence on scalable and sustainable approaches to delivering guideline-based genetic services in underserved primary care settings. Findings will inform best practices to reduce inequities in access to precision cancer prevention and early detection services.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
SEQUENTIAL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
MGT (Mainstream Genetic Testing) Model
The mainstream genetic testing (MGT) model of cancer genetic services involves a non-genetics healthcare provider, such as the primary care provider, who engages patients in the counseling, consenting, and ordering of genetic testing. The provider/care team discloses the genetic test results and refers patients for genetic counseling only when genetic test results are abnormal. By eliminating the pre- and post-test counseling visits with a genetics provider, the MGT model has the potential to provide scalable access to genetic services.
Mainstream Genetic Testing Model
Mainstream Genetic Testing Model of Cancer Genetics Service Delivery
SOC (Standard of Care) Model
The enhanced standard of care model (SOC+) is the current referral model of cancer genetic services delivery with an enhancement to include screening for and resources to address health literacy. This model begins with a health care provider's recognition, identification and then referral of a patient to a genetic counselor where genetic testing takes place if appropriate. This model is time- and resource- intensive and may not be scalable.
Enhanced Standard of Care Model
Enhanced Standard of Care Model of Cancer Genetic Service Delivery
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Mainstream Genetic Testing Model
Mainstream Genetic Testing Model of Cancer Genetics Service Delivery
Enhanced Standard of Care Model
Enhanced Standard of Care Model of Cancer Genetic Service Delivery
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. English speaking
3. Identified as eligible for cancer genetic testing for a hereditary breast or colon cancer syndrome (e.g., BRCA, Lynch or familial polyposis syndrome) as defined by NCCN criteria45-46
4. Screened positive and agreed to have study staff contact them in the future to participate in virtual/telephone interviews about their experiences with cancer genetics services.
5. Patient receiving care from one of the 4 Federally Qualified Health Center clinics enrolled in the clinical trial
2. Did not screen positive on HCRA and/ or did not agree to have study staff contact them in the future to participate in virtual/telephone interviews about their experiences with cancer genetics services.
3. Not a patient receiving care from the one of the clinics enrolled in the clincial trial
Aim 2
1. Provider or staff member at one of the 4 clinics participating in the clinical trial
2. English speaking
25 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Illinois at Chicago
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Pamela Ganschow
Principal Investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Illinois Cancer Center
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2022-1151
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.