Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
1 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-10-01
2024-12-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Barley Protein and CVD
NCT00334308
Meta-analyses of the Effect of Legumes on Blood Pressure
NCT02600338
Soybean Based Diets and CVD Risk Factors
NCT00175097
Effect of High-carbohydrate or High-monounsaturated Fat on Blood Pressure: Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
NCT02626325
The SWITCH (Substitution of High With Low Ultra-processed Soy Protein Foods In a Guideline-based Diet inTervention for Cardiometabolic Health) Trial
NCT06907862
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
OBJECTIVES: To conduct a systematic review of the effect of soy protein by food source on systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure in individuals with and without hypertension and assess the certainty of the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system.
DESIGN: The systematic review and meta-analyses will be conducted according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and reported according to the Preferred Reporting items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA).
DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase, and The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Clinical Trials; CENTRAL) will be searched using appropriate search terms supplemented by manual searches of references of included studies.
STUDY SELECTION: Randomized controlled trials of ≥3-weeks assessing the effect of soy protein food sources compared with a suitable non-soy-containing control group on blood pressure will be included.
DATA EXTRACTION: Two or more investigators will independently extract relevant data. Authors will be contacted for additional information and any missing data will be computed/imputed using standard formulae.
RISK OF BIAS: Two or more investigators will independently assess risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. All disagreements will be resolved by consensus.
OUTCOMES: The primary outcomes will be SBP and DBP.
DATA SYNTHESIS: Data will be pooled using the Generic Inverse Variance method for each outcome. Random effects models will be used even in the absence of statistically significant between-study heterogeneity, as they yield more conservative summary effect estimates in the presence of residual heterogeneity. Fixed-effects models will only be used where there is \<5 included studies. Paired analyses will be applied for crossover design trials. Heterogeneity will be assessed (Cochran Q statistic) and quantified (I2 statistic). Sources of heterogeneity will be explored (if there are \>=10 trial comparisons) by sensitivity analyses and a priori subgroup analyses (dose, soy protein food source, comparator, follow-up, baseline levels, design, age, health status, funding and risk of bias). Meta-regression analyses will assess the significance of categorical and continuous subgroups analyses. Publication bias will be assessed (if there are \>=10 trial comparisons) by inspection of funnel plots and the Egger and Begg tests. Adjustment for evidence of funnel plot asymmetry or small study effects will be conducted by the Duval and Tweedie trim-and-fill method.
GRADE ASSESSMENT. To assess the certainty of the evidence, the investigators will use the GRADE system, an evidence-based grading system adopted by \>100 organizations (http://www.gradeworkinggroup.org/). It grades the evidence as high, moderate, low or very low quality based on the study design and a series of downgrades (risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness, publication bias) and upgrades (large magnitude of the effect, dose-response gradient, and attenuation by confounding). The investigators will follow the GRADE handbook (https://gdt.gradepro.org/app/handbook/handbook.html) and use the GRADEpro GDT (gradepro.org) software.
SIGNIFICANCE: The proposed evidence synthesis will assess the role of different food sources of soy protein for blood pressure management, increasing the evidence-base for health claims and guidelines development and improving health outcomes, by educating healthcare providers and patients, stimulating industry innovation, and guiding future research design.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
OTHER
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Soy protein
Soy foods or isolated soy protein
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Soy intervention
* Non-soy comparator
* Intervention duration \>3 weeks
* Data for \>1 Outcome
Exclusion Criteria
* Non-Human Studies
* Lack of Suitable Comparator (i.e. soy-containing, equally matched doses)
* Multimodal interventions
* RCTs with participants \< 18 years of age
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Toronto
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
John Sievenpiper
Associate Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
John L. Sievenpiper, MD,PhD,FRCPC
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Toronto
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Clinical Nutrition and Risk Factor Modification Centre, St. Michael's Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CIHR - Soy and BP
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.