Influence of Nutritional Status on Oncologic and Operative Outcome in Patients Operated for Retroperitoneal Sarcoma

NCT ID: NCT05631379

Last Updated: 2024-10-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-12-02

Study Completion Date

2024-04-04

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a retrospective, observational study in consecutive patients operated on for primary RPS in the Institute of Oncology Ljubljana (Slovenia) between September 1999 and June 2020. This study aims to investigate the impact of preoperatively assessed body composition parameters on the perioperative outcomes of patients operated on for primary RPS. The impact of preoperative malnutrition, sarcopenia, sarcopenic obesity and myosteatosis to the oncologic and postoperative outcome in patients operated on for primary RPS will be examined. Additionally, the aim is to evaluate the prognostic role of preoperative immune and inflammatory markers (serum albumin level, C-reactive protein, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, platelet to lymphocyte ratio, high-sensitivity modified Glasgow prognostic score) and prognostic nutritional index in primary RPS patients undergoing surgery. Patient outcome will be evaluated in terms of overall survival (OS), local-recurrence free survival (LRFS), postoperative intrahospital length of stay, overall and major postoperative morbidity.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) are rare neoplasms of mesenchymal origin with estimated crude incidence of 0.3 cases per 100000 inhabitants per year. The most common histologic subtypes are well-differentiated and dedifferentiated liposarcoma and leiomyosarcoma, accounting for 42% and 26% of cases, respectively. RPS are optimally managed in multidisciplinary settings in specialized sarcoma centers. Surgical resection with an adequate margin of normal tissue is the cornerstone of curative therapy and en bloc surgical resection of localized tumors is the recommended surgical approach. This "extended" surgical approach (including resection of adjacent organs), is optimal for reducing local recurrence and improving overall survival.

Cancer patients undergoing surgical treatment face number of challenges which negatively impact their nutritional status. Patients are usually in catabolic state, which together with ongoing proteolysis and lipolysis as well as decreased protein synthesis contribute to development of cancer - associated cachexia. Most important nutritional disorders in these patients are malnutrition, sarcopenia, cancer cachexia. On the other side, often under-recognized, sarcopenic obesity is gaining attention in clinical and research settings.

The association of malnutrition and poor postoperative outcome has been demonstrated in patients with various cancer locations. Malnourished patients reportedly have longer length of postoperative stay (LOS), higher rates of 30-day mortality, infection rate, sepsis, reoperation, increased number of cardiopulmonary complications. Diagnostic process of malnutrition has been a topic of debate considering inconsistency in diagnostic methodology and criteria. Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) addressed this problem and recommended a new diagnostic scheme for malnutrition, in form of consensus report incorporating previous finding and recommendations from world leading clinical nutrition societies. To our knowledge, no study validated GLIM criteria in patients with primary RPS.

Sarcopenia is clinical syndrome characterized by generalized skeletal muscle mass loss, loss of strength and function (performance). Sarcopenia has been associated with lower survival rate and proved to be an independent predictor of survival in patients with breast cancer, pancreatic adenocarcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, and melanoma. There is a lack of studies investigating the impact of sarcopenia on survival and postoperative outcome in patients with soft-tissue sarcoma (STS), including retroperitoneal sarcoma. Similarly to malnutrition diagnosis, there is an evident inconsistency and confusion in diagnostic criteria and tools used to define and characterize sarcopenia in clinical practice and research. However, recently the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP2) published updated findings in form of Revised European Consensus. The Working Group proposed new recommendation, among which are those related to establishing specific cut-off points for body composition (primarily skeletal muscle quantity and quality) measures that identify and characterize sarcopenia.

Sarcopenic obesity (SO) is co-existence of sarcopenia and excess adiposity. Recent expert consensus of The European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) and the European Association for the Study of Obesity (EASO) will be followed for definition and diagnostic criteria for SO.

Myosteatosis is ectopic adipose tissue infiltration in skeletal muscle. Intermuscular adipose tissue can be quantified using CT scans by low muscle radiodensity. CT-derived myosteatosis contributes to impaired glucose metabolism, including insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and inflammation. Additionally, it may increase the risk for dyslipidemia. Myosteatosis may predict oncologic and postoperative outcome in primary RPS patients.

Patients with primary RPS are in a great risk for malnutrition, sarcopenia and cachexia for the number of reasons: requirement for demanding abdominal surgery in their management, catabolic tumor effects, long period before diagnosis of RPS and tumor size (approximately 15 cm). Due to their rarity, it is still unclear how preoperative nutritional status and body composition impact outcome of patients with primary RPS.

STUDY DESIGN DATA COLLECTION Patient's histories including the anaesthetician's preoperative reports, surgeon's operative reports, hospital records, and follow-up data will be collected. Paper and electronic data archive of Institute of Oncology Ljubljana Patient Data Information System will be used.

The following preoperative clinical data will be acquired: age, sex, preoperative weight, height, significant weight loss, appetite loss and weakness. CT reports will be also acquired for analysis as well as histopathological diagnosis (subtype), stage, grade and tumor size.

The preoperative laboratory data, including absolute counts of leukocytes, neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes and platelets, CRP, and albumin levels will be assessed. Data will be deidentified and whenever possible all measures to conceal patient identifiers and maintain patient confidentiality will be taken.

STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS The data will be presented using appropriate summary statistics: mean, median, standard deviation for continuous variables and percentages and frequencies for categorical variables. Kaplan-Meier method will be used for survival curves analysis and differences between survival rates compared using the log-rank test. The independent prognostic variables for survival (OS and LRFS) will be identified using Cox proportional hazard model (hazard ratio, 95% confidence interval, p value).

ETHICS The study was approved by Slovenian National Medical Ethics Committee, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana Review Board and Institute of Oncology Ljubljana Ethical Committee. The need to obtain informed consent from participants was waived.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Body Composition Malnutrition Sarcopenia Sarcopenic Obesity Myosteatosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

All patients meeting inclusion criteria

All patients meeting inclusion criteria

GLIM malnutrition criteria

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

GLIM criteria (Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition) will be applied to assess malnutrition

Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI)

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Prognostic Nutritional Index is diagnostic test based on serum albumin level and total lymphocyte count

The high-sensitivity modified Glasgow prognostic score

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

The high-sensitivity modified Glasgow prognostic score (Hs-mGPS) is an inflammation-based score consisted of C-reactive protein level and serum albumin

Subgroup of patients with available preoperative CT/MRI scans

Subgroup of patients with available preoperative CT/MRI scans will be detected and body composition measurements will be assessed min order to detect nutrition-related syndromes

Measurement of body composition with computed tomography (CT)

Intervention Type OTHER

The cross section of the third lumbar vertebrae in the CT scan images of the patients will be analyzed for assessment of body composition parameters including skeletal muscle area (SMA), muscle radiation attenuation (MRA), visceral adipose tissue (VAT), subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT)

GLIM malnutrition criteria

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

GLIM criteria (Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition) will be applied to assess malnutrition

EWGSOP2 sarcopenia criteria

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

EWGSOP2 criteria (Writing Group for the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People 2) will be followed to determine the diagnosis of sarcopenia

ESPEN-EASO criteria for sarcopenic obesity

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

The European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) and the European Association for the Study of Obesity (EASO) consensus criteria from 2018 will be applied to assess sarcopenic obesity

Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI)

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Prognostic Nutritional Index is diagnostic test based on serum albumin level and total lymphocyte count

The high-sensitivity modified Glasgow prognostic score

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

The high-sensitivity modified Glasgow prognostic score (Hs-mGPS) is an inflammation-based score consisted of C-reactive protein level and serum albumin

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Measurement of body composition with computed tomography (CT)

The cross section of the third lumbar vertebrae in the CT scan images of the patients will be analyzed for assessment of body composition parameters including skeletal muscle area (SMA), muscle radiation attenuation (MRA), visceral adipose tissue (VAT), subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT)

Intervention Type OTHER

GLIM malnutrition criteria

GLIM criteria (Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition) will be applied to assess malnutrition

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

EWGSOP2 sarcopenia criteria

EWGSOP2 criteria (Writing Group for the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People 2) will be followed to determine the diagnosis of sarcopenia

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

ESPEN-EASO criteria for sarcopenic obesity

The European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) and the European Association for the Study of Obesity (EASO) consensus criteria from 2018 will be applied to assess sarcopenic obesity

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI)

Prognostic Nutritional Index is diagnostic test based on serum albumin level and total lymphocyte count

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

The high-sensitivity modified Glasgow prognostic score

The high-sensitivity modified Glasgow prognostic score (Hs-mGPS) is an inflammation-based score consisted of C-reactive protein level and serum albumin

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients aged above 18 years old
* Patients with primary localized RPS or pelvic sarcoma operated at Surgical Department of Institute of Oncology in Ljubljana

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GISTs) and Retroperitoneal desmoid-type fibromatosis (DF)
* Patients with visceral sarcomas (arising from visceral organ i.e., gastrointestinal, and genitourinary tracts sarcoma)
* Patients with benign retroperitoneal / pelvic tumors
* Patients with residual RPS operated at another hospital
* Patients with present recurrent, secondary, and metastatic RPS
* Unable to access patients' data
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Institute of Oncology Ljubljana

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Manuel Ramanović, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Institute of Oncology Ljubljana

Ljubljana, , Slovenia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Slovenia

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Previtali P, Fiore M, Colombo J, Arendar I, Fumagalli L, Pizzocri M, Colombo C, Rampello NN, Mariani L, Gronchi A, Codazzi D. Malnutrition and Perioperative Nutritional Support in Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Patients: Results from a Prospective Study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Jun;27(6):2025-2032. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-08121-0. Epub 2019 Dec 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31848820 (View on PubMed)

Stiller CA, Trama A, Serraino D, Rossi S, Navarro C, Chirlaque MD, Casali PG; RARECARE Working Group. Descriptive epidemiology of sarcomas in Europe: report from the RARECARE project. Eur J Cancer. 2013 Feb;49(3):684-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.09.011. Epub 2012 Oct 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23079473 (View on PubMed)

Arends J, Baracos V, Bertz H, Bozzetti F, Calder PC, Deutz NEP, Erickson N, Laviano A, Lisanti MP, Lobo DN, McMillan DC, Muscaritoli M, Ockenga J, Pirlich M, Strasser F, de van der Schueren M, Van Gossum A, Vaupel P, Weimann A. ESPEN expert group recommendations for action against cancer-related malnutrition. Clin Nutr. 2017 Oct;36(5):1187-1196. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2017.06.017. Epub 2017 Jun 23.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28689670 (View on PubMed)

Cederholm T, Jensen GL, Correia MITD, Gonzalez MC, Fukushima R, Higashiguchi T, Baptista G, Barazzoni R, Blaauw R, Coats A, Crivelli A, Evans DC, Gramlich L, Fuchs-Tarlovsky V, Keller H, Llido L, Malone A, Mogensen KM, Morley JE, Muscaritoli M, Nyulasi I, Pirlich M, Pisprasert V, de van der Schueren MAE, Siltharm S, Singer P, Tappenden K, Velasco N, Waitzberg D, Yamwong P, Yu J, Van Gossum A, Compher C; GLIM Core Leadership Committee; GLIM Working Group. GLIM criteria for the diagnosis of malnutrition - A consensus report from the global clinical nutrition community. Clin Nutr. 2019 Feb;38(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2018.08.002. Epub 2018 Sep 3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30181091 (View on PubMed)

Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Bahat G, Bauer J, Boirie Y, Bruyere O, Cederholm T, Cooper C, Landi F, Rolland Y, Sayer AA, Schneider SM, Sieber CC, Topinkova E, Vandewoude M, Visser M, Zamboni M; Writing Group for the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People 2 (EWGSOP2), and the Extended Group for EWGSOP2. Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing. 2019 Jan 1;48(1):16-31. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afy169.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30312372 (View on PubMed)

Donini LM, Busetto L, Bischoff SC, Cederholm T, Ballesteros-Pomar MD, Batsis JA, Bauer JM, Boirie Y, Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Dicker D, Frara S, Fruhbeck G, Genton L, Gepner Y, Giustina A, Gonzalez MC, Han HS, Heymsfield SB, Higashiguchi T, Laviano A, Lenzi A, Nyulasi I, Parrinello E, Poggiogalle E, Prado CM, Salvador J, Rolland Y, Santini F, Serlie MJ, Shi H, Sieber CC, Siervo M, Vettor R, Villareal DT, Volkert D, Yu J, Zamboni M, Barazzoni R. Definition and Diagnostic Criteria for Sarcopenic Obesity: ESPEN and EASO Consensus Statement. Obes Facts. 2022;15(3):321-335. doi: 10.1159/000521241. Epub 2022 Feb 23.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35196654 (View on PubMed)

Hou T, Guo T, Nie R, Hong D, Zhou Z, Zhang X, Liang Y. The prognostic role of the preoperative systemic immune-inflammation index and high-sensitivity modified Glasgow prognostic score in patients after radical operation for soft tissue sarcoma. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020 Aug;46(8):1496-1502. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.05.026. Epub 2020 Jun 11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32576479 (View on PubMed)

Yang Z, Zhang B, Hou L, Xie Y, Cao X. Pre-operative prognostic nutritional index predicts the outcomes for triple-negative breast cancer. Tumour Biol. 2014 Dec;35(12):12165-71. doi: 10.1007/s13277-014-2524-6. Epub 2014 Aug 30.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25172099 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ERID-KSOPKR-0081/2020

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.