Gene Expression Study Between Two Dermal Injectables Hydroxylapatite Semi-permanent Filler

NCT ID: NCT05620043

Last Updated: 2024-03-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

21 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-09-28

Study Completion Date

2023-11-06

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To compare gene expression stimulated by a semi-permanent filler and a biostimulator via punch biopsy

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a randomized, single-center, comparative study to evaluate gene expression after treatment with a semi-permanent filler or a biostimulator.

This study is designed to enroll and randomize approximately 20 subjects in a 1:1 ratio of treatment to PLLA or CaHA. All randomized subjects are to have contour deficiency at the nasolabial folds.

Eligible subjects randomized to receive punch biopsy followed by treatment injection by the Treating Investigator at baseline. The method of injection was at the discretion of the Treating Investigator. A sufficient amount of product is injected to achieve optimal correction of the nasolabial folds, in the opinion of the Treating Investigator. PLLA group receives a second treatment at week 4 while CaHA group receives an optional touch-up if needed.

All subjects have final follow-up visit for a second punch biopsy on the other side of the nasolabial fold.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Gene Expression

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Randomized, single-center, comparative study
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Poly L-Lactic Acid (PLLA)

Lyophilized PLLA with sodium carboxymethylcellulose, non-pyrogenic mannitol. Treatment needs to be reconstituted prior to injection, following product instruction.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Sculptra

Intervention Type DEVICE

Biostimulator

Calcium Hydroxylapatite (CaHA)

Opaque, sterile, non-pyrogenic, semi-solid, cohesive implant whose component is synthetic CaHA suspended in a gel carrier of glycerin, sodium carboxymethylcellulose, 0.3% lidocaine hydrochloride, and sterile water. Treatment injection follows product instruction.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Radiesse Plus

Intervention Type DEVICE

Semi-permanent filler

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Sculptra

Biostimulator

Intervention Type DEVICE

Radiesse Plus

Semi-permanent filler

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Subject with a minimum of shallow nasolabial fold (NLF) contour deficiencies as assessed via the wrinkle assessment scale
* Subject with identical WAS scores on both NLFs
* Ability of giving consent for participation in the study
* Agreement to have skin biopsies on NLFs

Exclusion Criteria

* Significant NLF asymmetry, or different WAS score on each NLF
* Pregnant, planning pregnancy during the course of the study or breastfeeding
* History of allergy or hypersensitivity to any ingredient of the treatment products
* History of allergy or hypersensitivity to anesthetics or lidocaine
Minimum Eligible Age

22 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Galderma R&D

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jill S Waibel, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Miami Dermatology & Laser Institute

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Miami Dermatology & Laser Institute

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Waibel J, Ziegler M, Nguyen TQ, Le JHTD, Qureshi A, Widgerow A, Meckfessel M. Comparative Bulk RNA-Seq Analysis of Poly-l-Lactic Acid Versus Calcium Hydroxylapatite Reveals a Novel, Adipocyte-Mediated Regenerative Mechanism of Action Unique to PLLA. Dermatol Surg. 2024 Nov 1;50(11S):S166-S171. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000004425.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39480040 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

GLI.04.US.SL.020

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.