RHA®4 for Midface Volume Deficiency

NCT ID: NCT05133739

Last Updated: 2025-03-18

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

201 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-10-29

Study Completion Date

2024-01-29

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a prospective, randomized, controlled, blinded evaluator, multicenter, between subjects clinical study to identify whether RHA4 is non-inferior to a comparator device for treatment of midface volume deficiency 8 weeks after the last treatment (initial or touch-up).

At Screening, the treating investigator (TI) and the Blinded Live Evaluator (BLE) will evaluate independently the subject's midface using the validated 5-grade Teoxane Midface Volume Deficit Scale (TMVDS) for eligibility of the subject for the study. The BLE will establish a pretreatment score for assessment of effectiveness.

If the assessments of the TI and the BLE are the same or differ exactly by 1 point of the scale, the difference will be considered acceptable. The TI and the BLE need to agree that the subject meets the eligibility criterion (TMVDS grade 2 to 3). If the subject is eligible, the BLE's assessment will be used for the Baseline of the primary endpoint.

Eligible subjects will be enrolled and randomly assigned in a 3:1 ratio at Screening to receive RHA4 or comparator product.

The TI will administer the fillers, and if necessary, subjects will receive a touch-up treatment with the same product that they received on Visit 1, 4 weeks after the initial treatment to optimize the results. If the touch-up treatment is administered, the subject will be asked to come to the site for an additional visit 4 weeks after the touch-up injection.

Subjects will be followed for 52 weeks after their last treatment (initial treatment or touch-up), at which point, they will be offered re-treatment with RHA® 4, regardless of their original treatment, provided that the TI deems the treatment to be appropriate and the subject agrees. Reasons for not administering the re-treatment will be documented.

The subject will then be followed for an additional 12 weeks before exiting the study. If the subject or the TI declines re-treatment, this visit (52 weeks after the last treatment) will be considered the study Exit visit.

For subjects with re-treatment, the Exit visit will be 12 weeks after the re-treatment.

The TI will conduct safety and effectiveness evaluations at each study visit, which will occur: at 4 weeks after the initial and touch-up treatment, 8, 24, and 52 weeks after the last treatment, and after re treatment or until all treatment-related ongoing adverse events (AEs) have resolved or resolved with sequelae as per TI judgment or if follow-up is no longer possible.

A follow-up telephone call for safety will be performed 3 days after each treatment.

Subjects will report their common treatment responses (CTRs) in a subject diary for 30 days after each injection. The diary will also include a list of selected AEs potentially associated with injection of dermal fillers for subjects to report if applicable. All efforts should be made by the TI to schedule the applicable visits to allow completion of the CTR diary.

A BLE will conduct assessments of effectiveness during the study, including assessment of the primary endpoint 8 weeks after the last treatment.

The BLE will be blinded to allocation to groups (RHA4 group or comparator product group).

Furthermore, to ensure that they remain blinded and unbiased when making their assessments throughout the study, the BLE, TI, and subjects will not be allowed to refer to each other's effectiveness assessments. All subjects will be instructed to not discuss their study treatment, AEs, or CTRs with the BLE.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cheek Augmentation Correction of Age-related Midface Contour Deficiencies

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
Blinded-Live Evaluator

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

RHA®4

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

injection of RHA®4 in Midface

Intervention Type DEVICE

RHA® 4 is a sterile, biodegradable, biocompatible, viscoelastic, clear, colorless, homogenized gel implant. It consists of cross-linked hyaluronic acid produced by fermentation of Streptococcus equi bacteria, formulated to a concentration of 23 mg/mL and 0.3% w/w lidocaine in a physiologic buffer.

Up to 3.0 mL injected per cheek (subcutaneous and/or supraperiosteal layer). Touch-up treatment provided at 4 weeks (up to 3.0 mL per cheek).

Comparator Device

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

injection of Comparator Product in Midface

Intervention Type DEVICE

Comparator product is sterile, biodegradable, colorless gel of hyaluronic acid generated by Streptococcus species of bacteria, chemically crosslinked with BDDE.

Up to 3.0 mL injected per cheek (subcutaneous and/or supraperiosteal layer). Touch-up treatment provided at 4 weeks (up to 3.0 mL per cheek).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

injection of RHA®4 in Midface

RHA® 4 is a sterile, biodegradable, biocompatible, viscoelastic, clear, colorless, homogenized gel implant. It consists of cross-linked hyaluronic acid produced by fermentation of Streptococcus equi bacteria, formulated to a concentration of 23 mg/mL and 0.3% w/w lidocaine in a physiologic buffer.

Up to 3.0 mL injected per cheek (subcutaneous and/or supraperiosteal layer). Touch-up treatment provided at 4 weeks (up to 3.0 mL per cheek).

Intervention Type DEVICE

injection of Comparator Product in Midface

Comparator product is sterile, biodegradable, colorless gel of hyaluronic acid generated by Streptococcus species of bacteria, chemically crosslinked with BDDE.

Up to 3.0 mL injected per cheek (subcutaneous and/or supraperiosteal layer). Touch-up treatment provided at 4 weeks (up to 3.0 mL per cheek).

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Outpatient, male or female of any race, 22 years of age or older
* Female subjects of childbearing potential must have a negative UPT and practice a reliable method of contraception throughout the study.
* Seeking treatment of midface volume deficiency (realistic and achievable as per TI opinion)
* Having midface volume loss of grades 2 to 3 on the TMVDS (ranging from 0 = absent to 4 = very severe). The BLE and TI must independently assess and agree that this criterion is met; however, concordance of fullness is not required. If the assessments of the TI and the BLE are the same or differ by exactly 1 point on the scale, this difference is considered acceptable. If the assessments differ by 2 points or more on the scale, the subject will not be eligible.
* Having cheeks of the same TMVDS grade on the left and right side of the face (i.e., approximate bilateral symmetry)
* Willing to abstain from facial aesthetic procedures/therapies that could interfere with study evaluations
* Able to follow study instructions and complete all required visits.
* Sign the IRB-approved ICF, Photographic Release Form and the Authorization for Use and release of Health and Research Study Information (HIPAA) form prior to any study- related procedures being performed.

Exclusion Criteria

* Known hypersensitivity or previous allergic reaction to any component of the study devices.
* Known sensitivity to local anesthetics of the amide type, history of multiple severe allergies, or history of anaphylactic shock.
* History of active chronic debilitating systemic disease that, in the opinion of the investigator, would make the subject a poor candidate in the study.
* History of connective tissue disease.
* Clinically significant alcohol or drug abuse, or history of poor cooperation or unreliability.
* Exposure to any other investigational drug/device within 90 days of entering the study or planning to participate in another investigation during the course of the study.
Minimum Eligible Age

22 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Teoxane SA

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

United States, Massachusetts

Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

TEO-RHA-2004

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.