Advanced TecHnologies For SuccEssful AblatioN of AF in Clinical Practice
NCT ID: NCT05617456
Last Updated: 2022-11-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
4100 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-01-01
2029-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The purpose of this study is to prospectively evaluate during time a large population of patients with an indication for ablation of AF, collecting data on procedural success in the acute and medium- to long-term follow-up. The primary objective of the study is the determination of up to 20 clinical and procedural parameters predicting the recurrence-free at the medium-long term follow-up in consecutive patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation through a standard of care pathway. The success of the ablation is defined in terms of percentage of patients free from any clinical atrial arrhythmia at a 12-month follow-up from the procedure.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Predictive Factors for Successful Outcome After Pulmonary Veins Ablation to Treat Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
NCT02614521
Prospective Cohort Study of the Risk of Recurrent Atrial Fibrillation After Radiofrequency Ablation
NCT05638841
Current Clinical Practice in the Management of Atrial Fibrillation in Greece: the MANAGE-AF Study
NCT01317602
The Influence of Genetic Predisposition on Outcome After Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation.
NCT04753541
Catheter Ablation of All Inducible AT Post AF Ablation
NCT03343860
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
AF catheter ablation is a well-established treatment for the prevention of AF recurrences. While several ablation strategies have been claimed to be effective, the standard approach to the treatment of paroxysmal AF (PAF) and non-longstanding persistent AF is pulmonary vein isolation (PVI).
Worldwide catheter ablation is increasingly being performed in AF patients. The clinical approach to catheter ablation today reflects a range in operator training and workflow preferences for different types of AF ablation procedures. More structured characterization and treatment have been proposed in order to better individualize AF treatments to reflect the highly individualized AF disease state. In important ways, however, the procedure remains relatively unchanged and is constrained by a somewhat limited set of diagnostic and therapeutic modalities. These constraints are further compounded by incoherence in an understanding of clinically meaningful endpoints for intervention and particularly catheter ablation. New technologies present EPs with greater choice and the potential for greater understanding, and it is of paramount importance to identify which patient will benefit most from a specific ablation technology and approach.
To date, several predictors of recurrence have been identified in various studies. Increasing age is a prominent AF risk factor, but increasing burden of other comorbidities including hypertension, diabetes mellitus, heart failure (HF), coronary artery disease (CAD), chronic kidney disease (CKD), obesity, and obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) have been demonstrated to be also important; modifiable risk factors are potent contributors to AF development and progression. However, not one of these clinical parameters is able to predict arrhythmia recurrences at a high level of evidence and the only clinical parameter that demonstrated a potential link to AF recurrence was AF type. A possible explanation of these results is that the studies on AF ablation are extremely heterogeneous regarding patient selection, patient characteristics, follow-up, variation in most of the clinical variables and procedural features. This variability claims for a structured data collection that possibly overcomes intrinsic limitation of a conventional, retrospective data collection in a multicenter, standard of care fashion. Identifying upfront individuals at higher risk of developing AF in the community could facilitate targeting of preventive interventions and screening programs for early AF detection, for example in high-risk subgroups such as post-stroke patients.
In addition, although ablative treatment has been extensively evaluated in specific patient subgroups and in controlled clinical trials, information derived from clinical practice, and in particular regarding long-term outcome, is generally few and fragmented, also lacking a large cohort of prospective and multicenter study that can confirm the results of scientific research in the "real world". To date, in fact, in clinical practice registries, a limited amount of information is available about indications, acute and long-term results and complications. It is therefore of the utmost importance to evaluate the actual management of patients undergoing ablation, so as to be able to assess the trends in the therapeutic approach and potentially identify critical issues that may be subject to improvement.
The primary objective of the study is the determination of a series of clinical and procedural parameters predicting the recurrence-free at the medium-long term follow-up in consecutive patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation through a standard of care pathway. The success of the ablation is defined in terms of percentage of patients free from any clinical atrial arrhythmia at a 12-month follow-up from the procedure.
Secondary objectives of the study are: percentage of patients free from any clinical atrial arrhythmias, evaluation of acute procedural success, correlation between acute success and medium- long-term success, evaluation of the proportion of patients who will be asymptomatic during follow-up, patient reported outcomes, rate of clinical atrial fibrillation recurrence during follow up, rate of occurrence of other arrhythmias during follow-up, association between occurrence of atrial arrhythmias and therapy adoption and patient' selection, association between ECG characteristics before / after ablation and its variations and patients' outcome, estimation of costs associated with the use of health care resources, rate of the adverse events associated with the primary ablation procedure and overall procedure time.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
AF ablation
Patients with standard indications to AF ablation
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients who are willing and capable of providing informed consent, participating in all testing at an approved clinical investigational center.
* Patients whose age is 18 years or above, and of legal age to give informed consent specific to state and national law.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients who are unwilling or unable to sign an authorization to use and disclose health information or an Informed Consent.
* Patients unavailable or not willing to complete follow up visits and examination for the duration of the study at the center.
* Life expectancy ≤ 12 months per physician judgment.
* Unrecovered/unresolved Adverse Events from any previous invasive procedure;
* Women of childbearing potential who are, or plan to become, pregnant during the time of the study (method of assessment upon physician's discretion)
* Left atrial thrombus in pre-procedure imaging within 4 weeks of the ablation procedure.
* AF secondary to electrolyte imbalance, thyroid disease or reversible non- cardiac cause
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Giulio Zucchelli
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Giulio Zucchelli
Principal Investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana
Pisa, , Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Moltrasio M, Iacopino S, Solimene F, Bianchi S, Schiavone M, Themistoclakis S, Rossillo A, Bertini M, Zirolia D, Volpicelli M, Zingarini G, Dello Russo A, Malacrida M, Zucchelli G, Tondo C. Termination of atrial arrhythmia and restoration of sinus rhythm during pulsed field ablation with a pentaspline catheter in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2025 Jul 1;27(7):euaf144. doi: 10.1093/europace/euaf144.
Dello Russo A, Tondo C, Bianchi S, Schillaci V, Iacopino S, Casella M, Rossillo A, Maggio R, Themistoclakis S, Bertini M, Russo M, Volpicelli M, Viola G, Rordorf R, Schiavone M, Valeri Y, Colella J, Rossi P, Tundo F, Zingarini G, De Simone A, Bianchini L, Di Vilio A, Compagnucci P, Malacrida M, Zucchelli G, Solimene F. Does Age Impact Safety and Efficacy During Pulse-Field Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation? J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 May 6;14(9):e037959. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.037959. Epub 2025 Apr 23.
Bisignani A, Solimene F, Iacopino S, Polselli M, Dello Russo A, Tondo C, Rossillo A, Themistoclakis S, Maggio R, Russo M, Volpicelli M, Schillaci V, Schiavone M, Colella J, Casella M, Malacrida M, Zucchelli G, Bianchi S. Insight Into Early Recurrences After Pulsed-Field Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: Results From a Multicenter Experience. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2025 Jun;36(6):1323-1332. doi: 10.1111/jce.16670. Epub 2025 Apr 7.
Bisignani A, Schiavone M, Solimene F, Dello Russo A, Filannino P, Magnocavallo M, Tondo C, Schillaci V, Casella M, Petretta A, Rossi P, Fassini G, Rossillo A, Maggio R, Themistoclakis S, Pandozi C, Polselli M, Tundo F, Arestia A, Compagnucci P, Valente Perrone A, Malacrida M, Iacopino S, Bianchi S. National workflow experience with pulsed field ablation for atrial fibrillation: learning curve, efficiency, and safety. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2024 Dec;67(9):2127-2136. doi: 10.1007/s10840-024-01835-6. Epub 2024 May 30.
Iacopino S, Colella J, Dini D, Mantovani L, Sorrenti PF, Malacrida M, Filannino P. Sedation strategies for pulsed-field ablation of atrial fibrillation: focus on deep sedation with intravenous ketamine in spontaneous respiration. Europace. 2023 Aug 2;25(9):euad230. doi: 10.1093/europace/euad230.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
20977
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.